Main Page: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
{{WikiHikmah sidebar}} | {{WikiHikmah sidebar}} | ||
Hikmah Islam is characterised by an epistemic-led method. Rather than treating doctrine as a closed collection of inherited propositions, it arranges its positions as rational entailments: claims that are intended to follow from prior commitments concerning consciousness, intelligibility, truth, intellect, value, revelation, authority, and human development. | |||
Contemporary developments in philosophy, science, psychology, artificial intelligence, cosmology, and historical criticism are treated as continuing sites of refinement rather than threats to the tradition. | |||
A distinctive feature of Hikmah Islam is its use of rational entailments and comparative clusters. It attempts to organise religious, philosophical, ethical, political, and civilisational claims as a connected sequence from first principles of consciousness, intelligibility, and truth to the final aims of wisdom, noocracy, divine-likeness, and future sentient flourishing. It also interprets many religious, philosophical, mythic, and cultural terms as symbolic or historically clothed expressions of deeper rational forms. In this sense, Hikmah Islam is Islamic in root, mystical and philosophical in method, civilisational in scope, and oriented toward the future protection and perfection of humanity and sentient life, especially in the face of technological and artificial-intelligence-related risks. | |||
[[File:Hikmah_Scholars_Courtyard.png|center|900px]] | |||
== Principles and aims == | |||
=== Sovereignty of Intellect === | |||
Hikmatis present their movement as a contemporary articulation of an ancient wisdom-oriented project in which religious, philosophical, ethical, historical, and political claims are organised as a connected sequence from first principles to practical order. Grounded in the primacy of the intellect, Hikmah Islam treats reason as the criterion by which authority, identity, symbolism, inherited doctrine, and social order are to be assessed. It therefore defines itself as a principle-led, transcendent, data-driven, argument-based, evidence-based, adaptive, and ethically purposive project in motion rather than a static system of veneration or dogma. | Hikmatis present their movement as a contemporary articulation of an ancient wisdom-oriented project in which religious, philosophical, ethical, historical, and political claims are organised as a connected sequence from first principles to practical order. Grounded in the primacy of the intellect, Hikmah Islam treats reason as the criterion by which authority, identity, symbolism, inherited doctrine, and social order are to be assessed. It therefore defines itself as a principle-led, transcendent, data-driven, argument-based, evidence-based, adaptive, and ethically purposive project in motion rather than a static system of veneration or dogma. | ||
| Line 14: | Line 25: | ||
At the level of the self, this means the rule of intellect over appetite, ego, fear, fantasy, impulse, and inherited error through purification, self-mastery, education, initiation, discipline, and inner transformation. At the level of society, it means the ordering of civilisation by wisdom rather than by force, wealth, tribe, race, clerical formalism, mass appetite, or unexamined dogma. Hikmah Islam therefore treats religion, narrative, myth, law, ritual, education, political authority, esoteric discipline, and institutional formation as historically variable instruments by which different societies may be guided toward higher consciousness and moral-intellectual development. | At the level of the self, this means the rule of intellect over appetite, ego, fear, fantasy, impulse, and inherited error through purification, self-mastery, education, initiation, discipline, and inner transformation. At the level of society, it means the ordering of civilisation by wisdom rather than by force, wealth, tribe, race, clerical formalism, mass appetite, or unexamined dogma. Hikmah Islam therefore treats religion, narrative, myth, law, ritual, education, political authority, esoteric discipline, and institutional formation as historically variable instruments by which different societies may be guided toward higher consciousness and moral-intellectual development. | ||
=== Divinisation and noocracy === | |||
Its stated aim, as a form of guardianship of humanity, is not merely the preservation of human life or identity, but the universal cultivation of divine-like human perfection and the progressive actualisation of divine-like qualities such as wisdom, knowledge, justice, mercy, truth, consciousness, self-mastery, creative responsibility, and just civilisational order. | Its stated aim, as a form of guardianship of humanity, is not merely the preservation of human life or identity, but the universal cultivation of divine-like human perfection and the progressive actualisation of divine-like qualities such as wisdom, knowledge, justice, mercy, truth, consciousness, self-mastery, creative responsibility, and just civilisational order. | ||
| Line 19: | Line 32: | ||
Divinisation of humanity is understood not as literal identity with God, but in a sense similar to that advocated and practised by Jesus, Muhammad, and Khomeini: the ethical and mystical embodiment of divine-like human perfection. Within this account, Muhammad and Khomeini are additionally treated as figures through whom prophetic wisdom, revelation, law, community, and civilisational order were historically established or revived, with Khomeini in particular understood as the modern reviver of philosopher-based political leadership reconnecting spiritual authority, legal reasoning, political sovereignty, and the governance of society by religious-intellectual guardianship. | Divinisation of humanity is understood not as literal identity with God, but in a sense similar to that advocated and practised by Jesus, Muhammad, and Khomeini: the ethical and mystical embodiment of divine-like human perfection. Within this account, Muhammad and Khomeini are additionally treated as figures through whom prophetic wisdom, revelation, law, community, and civilisational order were historically established or revived, with Khomeini in particular understood as the modern reviver of philosopher-based political leadership reconnecting spiritual authority, legal reasoning, political sovereignty, and the governance of society by religious-intellectual guardianship. | ||
The overarching orientation may therefore be described as noocratic in character: the view that both the individual life and the just ordering of society should be guided by the highest development and correct exercise of the intellect. Its political expression is noocracy: the ordering of personal and collective life by intellect, wisdom, and the highest development of consciousness. In this sense, the intellect is treated as the commander of the human being and, by extension, the rightful principle of leadership in social and political life with the aim of maximising global wellbeing. | The overarching orientation may therefore be described as noocratic in character: the view that both the individual life and the just ordering of society should be guided by the highest development and correct exercise of the intellect. Its political expression is noocracy: the ordering of personal and collective life by intellect, wisdom, and the highest development of consciousness. In this sense, the intellect is treated as the commander of the human being and, by extension, the rightful principle of leadership in social and political life with the aim of maximising global wellbeing. | ||
=== Metaphysics and comparative interpretation === | |||
The movement's current metaphysical framework is developed under [[Hikmati Metaphysics]], an evolving and rationally revisable account of existence, consciousness, intellect, time, causation, mathematical objects, value, and the structure of reality. Hikmati Metaphysics is not treated as a closed creed, but as the present best formulation of Hikmah Islam's metaphysical commitments, subject to refinement or replacement by stronger arguments, clearer models, and deeper correspondence with reality. | The movement's current metaphysical framework is developed under [[Hikmati Metaphysics]], an evolving and rationally revisable account of existence, consciousness, intellect, time, causation, mathematical objects, value, and the structure of reality. Hikmati Metaphysics is not treated as a closed creed, but as the present best formulation of Hikmah Islam's metaphysical commitments, subject to refinement or replacement by stronger arguments, clearer models, and deeper correspondence with reality. | ||
The framework interprets many religious, philosophical, mythic, and cultural terms as symbolic or culturally mediated expressions of more abstract rational forms. These are organised into what the framework calls ''Hikmah comparative clusters''. Such clusters do not imply that terms from different traditions are historically identical, doctrinally interchangeable, or used in the same way by their original communities. Rather, they indicate concepts that Hikmah Islam interprets as converging upon, approximating, or partially expressing a shared underlying rational entailment when abstracted from their particular symbolic, confessional, and cultural forms. | The framework interprets many religious, philosophical, mythic, and cultural terms as symbolic or culturally mediated expressions of more abstract rational forms. These are organised into what the framework calls ''Hikmah comparative clusters''. Such clusters do not imply that terms from different traditions are historically identical, doctrinally interchangeable, or used in the same way by their original communities. Rather, they indicate concepts that Hikmah Islam interprets as converging upon, approximating, or partially expressing a shared underlying rational entailment when abstracted from their particular symbolic, confessional, and cultural forms. | ||
==Name and identity== | ==Name and identity== | ||