Main Page: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 181: | Line 181: | ||
===14) Material dimension=== | ===14) Material dimension=== | ||
Cosmos • Dunyā • Material realm • Material world • Multiverse • Natural World • Olam HaZeh • Physical world • Sensible dimension • Sensible realm • Sensible world • Universe | |||
The material order is a stable, mathematically tractable layer within graded being. Its regularities are intelligible and publicly checkable; they instantiate the very demand of PSR in the contingent domain. Treating it as illusory in the pejorative sense would make empirical knowledge impossible; treating it as ultimate would contradict the explanatory ascent already established. | |||
===15) B-theory of time=== | |||
The dependence structure described above favours time as an order of states rather than an ontological “flow” in the foundation. On the B-theory, events are tenselessly ordered (earlier-than/later-than). Change is real as difference across the order, not as a metaphysical becoming at the ultimate level. This preserves causality and explanation while avoiding reifying “passage” as a primitive. | |||
===16) Compatibilism=== | |||
Divine Decree • Divine Predestination • Illusion of Libertarian Free Will • Predestination • Qadar • Soft determinism | |||
Libertarian “could-have-done-otherwise” at the moment of action, ungrounded by reasons, is incoherent under PSR. Yet rational agency remains: we act from reasons that express our form, character, and understanding. This reasons-responsive (compatibilist) agency preserves responsibility while avoiding metaphysical indeterminacy that would reintroduce brute facts. | |||
Divine predestination (qadar) is understood through the principle of necessitarianism: all events unfold according to the immutable nexus of causation grounded in divine omniscience. God’s knowledge is not temporal foreknowledge but the eternal self-knowledge of Being — every event, possibility, and contingency already contained within the necessary structure of existence. Human freedom, within this view, is not libertarian but compatibilist: freedom is the self-expression of necessity at the human level, as articulated by Spinoza and echoed by Sadra’s doctrine of substantial motion (ḥaraka jawhariyya). To affirm qadar is to recognise that reality could not have been otherwise — its totality is the rational unfolding of divine simplicity through graded manifestation. | |||
=== | ===17) [[Consciousness]]=== | ||
Consciousness is the indubitable datum: all inquiry is conducted within it. Within a graded ontology, consciousness is not an inert by-product but an intensity of actuality through which being is self-revealing in finite centres. Denying consciousness to make room for a purely extrinsic materialism undermines the very conditions of knowing. | Consciousness is the indubitable datum: all inquiry is conducted within it. Within a graded ontology, consciousness is not an inert by-product but an intensity of actuality through which being is self-revealing in finite centres. Denying consciousness to make room for a purely extrinsic materialism undermines the very conditions of knowing. | ||
=== | ===18) Analytic Idealism=== | ||
Meta-Consciousness • Dissociation, Reassociation | |||
Unity and gradation motivate a model in which a meta-conscious field grounds many finite streams. Individual minds are dissociations—bounded, rule-governed perspectives within the field. Exceptional states (deep sleep, near-death, mystical union) exemplify reassociation, i.e., loosening or widening of the bounds. This is not a licence for speculation; it is a way to render mind-world relations intelligible under the prior ontology. | Unity and gradation motivate a model in which a meta-conscious field grounds many finite streams. Individual minds are dissociations—bounded, rule-governed perspectives within the field. Exceptional states (deep sleep, near-death, mystical union) exemplify reassociation, i.e., loosening or widening of the bounds. This is not a licence for speculation; it is a way to render mind-world relations intelligible under the prior ontology. | ||
=== | ===19) Perdurantism=== | ||
If finite minds are dissociations within a wider field, there is no a priori reason to assert that the onset of one’s conscious stream coincides with biological birth. “Prelife” names the rational openness—consistent with the priors—to pre-embodied conditions of perspective without committing to any particular folklore. | If finite minds are dissociations within a wider field, there is no a priori reason to assert that the onset of one’s conscious stream coincides with biological birth. “Prelife” names the rational openness—consistent with the priors—to pre-embodied conditions of perspective without committing to any particular folklore. | ||
| Line 213: | Line 215: | ||
Given the B-series, the felt flow of time is a feature of consciousness—our way of accessing successive states—rather than a fundamental becoming. This clarifies memory, anticipation, and temporal phenomenology without elevating them to ontological primitives. | Given the B-series, the felt flow of time is a feature of consciousness—our way of accessing successive states—rather than a fundamental becoming. This clarifies memory, anticipation, and temporal phenomenology without elevating them to ontological primitives. | ||
=== | ===20) Physical empiricism=== | ||
Empirical method • Scientific method | |||
Because contingent facts can only be discriminated by observation, test, and replication, science is reason’s mandated method for the natural world: model, predict, measure, attempt to falsify, update. This is not an optional cultural choice; it is the epistemic application of PSR and contingency to nature. Where controlled experiment is impossible (e.g., cosmology), methodological surrogates (consilience, retrodiction, robustness checks) carry the same rational aim. | |||
===21) Recognition of potential=== | |||
===22) Primacy of intellect=== | |||
===23) Actualising personal potential=== | |||
'Ibādah • Islām • Servitude • Submission • Worship | |||
=== | ===24) Actualisation of potential=== | ||
Anubhava • Enlightenment • Henosis • Ilhām • Nirvana • Nubuwwah • Perfect knowledge acquisition • Prophethood • Samadhi • Revelation • Wahī | |||
===25) Actualising regional potential=== | |||
=== | Messengership • Risālah | ||
===26) Actualising global potential / [[Maximisation of Personal & Global Wellbeing (Constrained)]]==== | |||
If value is not to be brute, it must answer to intelligible reasons. The minimal cross-cultural denominator is sentient wellbeing: gradients of suffering and flourishing, plus the capabilities that realise rational goods (knowledge, friendship, beauty, virtue). Metrics must be public, evidence-based, and revisable. | If value is not to be brute, it must answer to intelligible reasons. The minimal cross-cultural denominator is sentient wellbeing: gradients of suffering and flourishing, plus the capabilities that realise rational goods (knowledge, friendship, beauty, virtue). Metrics must be public, evidence-based, and revisable. | ||
| Line 246: | Line 245: | ||
Given universal concern and PSR, ethics aims at maximising net wellbeing over appropriate horizons, constrained by justice, rights, trust, and long-run stability. Deontic rules function as structural safeguards that, justified by experience and game-theoretic insight, protect aggregate flourishing from short-sighted optimising. | Given universal concern and PSR, ethics aims at maximising net wellbeing over appropriate horizons, constrained by justice, rights, trust, and long-run stability. Deontic rules function as structural safeguards that, justified by experience and game-theoretic insight, protect aggregate flourishing from short-sighted optimising. | ||
=== | ===26) Gradation of Intellect=== | ||
Pedagogy, Society, and Rule | Pedagogy, Society, and Rule | ||
| Line 256: | Line 255: | ||
Because capacities and responsibilities differ, functions stratify in any complex society: research, judgment, instruction, execution. Properly construed, hierarchy is ordered service to the common good, not domination. | Because capacities and responsibilities differ, functions stratify in any complex society: research, judgment, instruction, execution. Properly construed, hierarchy is ordered service to the common good, not domination. | ||
Divine Scriptures | |||
The “Books of God” (kutub Allāh) are interpreted as moments of revelation — epistemic apprehensions of divine truth by human consciousness. Revelation, in this view, is not linguistic dictation but intellectual illumination: the human mind’s reception of eternal truths refracted through its historical, linguistic, and psychological contingencies. Each scripture — Torah, Psalms, Gospel, and Qur’an — represents a theophany (tajallī) of the same divine logos expressed in the idiom of a particular community and epoch. Universal revelations express perennial metaphysical truths; particular ones address contextual, socio-moral arrangements. Thus, the diversity of scriptures is the necessary pluralisation of the One Truth within time and language. | The “Books of God” (kutub Allāh) are interpreted as moments of revelation — epistemic apprehensions of divine truth by human consciousness. Revelation, in this view, is not linguistic dictation but intellectual illumination: the human mind’s reception of eternal truths refracted through its historical, linguistic, and psychological contingencies. Each scripture — Torah, Psalms, Gospel, and Qur’an — represents a theophany (tajallī) of the same divine logos expressed in the idiom of a particular community and epoch. Universal revelations express perennial metaphysical truths; particular ones address contextual, socio-moral arrangements. Thus, the diversity of scriptures is the necessary pluralisation of the One Truth within time and language. | ||
===27) Noocracy=== | |||
Imāmah • Perfect manhood • Philosopher kingship • Technocracy | |||
The ideal governor unites wisdom (ends) and techne (means), is accountable to demonstrable truth, and orders institutions to the common good. Historical forms vary (council, imamate, constitutional technocracy), but the rational principle is stable: competence guided by virtue under intelligible law. | |||
The | Imamate signifies the perpetuation of divine guidance through intellectual continuity rather than genealogical descent. The imām is the bearer of ʿaql mustafād—the fully actualised intellect that mediates between transcendent truth and communal life. In rationalist terms, the Imamate represents the principle of intellectual succession: the necessity that wisdom, once disclosed, be continuously embodied in minds capable of sustaining and interpreting it. | ||
=== | ===28) [[Philosopher King]]=== | ||
Demigod • High-Conscious Individual • High-Integration Individual • Hujjah • Imām • Infallible • Insān al-Kāmil • Insān ‘alā Khuluqin ‘Adhīm • Integrate • Ma'sūm • Messenger • Meta-Conscious Agent • Nabī • New Man • Perfect human • Perfect rational animal • Philosopher king • Prophet • Rasūl • Transhuman • Übermensch | Demigod • High-Conscious Individual • High-Integration Individual • Hujjah • Imām • Infallible • Insān al-Kāmil • Insān ‘alā Khuluqin ‘Adhīm • Integrate • Ma'sūm • Messenger • Meta-Conscious Agent • Nabī • New Man • Perfect human • Perfect rational animal • Philosopher king • Prophet • Rasūl • Transhuman • Übermensch | ||
Prophethood (nubuwwa) denotes the emergence of consciousnesses capable of receiving and articulating revelatory truths. Prophets are loci of intensified noetic awareness through whom divine wisdom becomes existentially and socially operative. | Prophethood (nubuwwa) denotes the emergence of consciousnesses capable of receiving and articulating revelatory truths. Prophets are loci of intensified noetic awareness through whom divine wisdom becomes existentially and socially operative. | ||
Muhammad is affirmed as the Seal of Prophethood (khātam al-nabiyyīn) with respect to the specific historical-cultural dispensation of late antiquity — i.e., the terminal synthesis of the Abrahamic prophetic cycle within the Arabian milieu. However, the rationalist view recognises the logical possibility of analogous prophetic functions in other spatio-temporal contexts; Mani, the Buddha, or Socrates, for instance, may be regarded as prior or parallel manifestations of the same revelatory continuum. Prophethood thus designates not an exclusive office but a metaphysical function within the evolution of consciousness — each prophet serving as a node through which universal wisdom (ḥikma) becomes historically embodied. | Muhammad is affirmed as the Seal of Prophethood (khātam al-nabiyyīn) with respect to the specific historical-cultural dispensation of late antiquity — i.e., the terminal synthesis of the Abrahamic prophetic cycle within the Arabian milieu. However, the rationalist view recognises the logical possibility of analogous prophetic functions in other spatio-temporal contexts; Mani, the Buddha, or Socrates, for instance, may be regarded as prior or parallel manifestations of the same revelatory continuum. Prophethood thus designates not an exclusive office but a metaphysical function within the evolution of consciousness — each prophet serving as a node through which universal wisdom (ḥikma) becomes historically embodied. | ||
====Nubuwwa (Prophethood)==== | ====Nubuwwa (Prophethood)==== | ||
Prophets are higher modes of consciousness through which divine intellect becomes articulated in human history. Their distinction lies not in supernatural interruption but in perfected receptivity to truth. Prophetic communication is the linguistic and cultural crystallisation of universal wisdom within a particular civilisational horizon. | Prophets are higher modes of consciousness through which divine intellect becomes articulated in human history. Their distinction lies not in supernatural interruption but in perfected receptivity to truth. Prophetic communication is the linguistic and cultural crystallisation of universal wisdom within a particular civilisational horizon. | ||