Main Page: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
ONE LINER | |||
'''Hikmah Islam''', ''(Arabic: الحكماء, romanised: Al-Hukamāh, lit. 'The Wise Ones' or 'The Sages'; or أهل الحكمة, romanised: Ahl al-Hikmah, lit. 'The People of Wisdom')'' commonly known as '''Rationalist Islam,''' is the rational-empirical branch of the Islamic school of philosophers and mystics. | '''Hikmah Islam''', ''(Arabic: الحكماء, romanised: Al-Hukamāh, lit. 'The Wise Ones' or 'The Sages'; or أهل الحكمة, romanised: Ahl al-Hikmah, lit. 'The People of Wisdom')'' commonly known as '''Rationalist Islam,''' is the rational-empirical branch of the Islamic school of philosophers and mystics. | ||
Hikmah Islam is a mystical, philosophical, and noetic-civilisational movement, tracing its wisdom-oriented conceptual ancestry origins | |||
consciousness, rational entailment, and the perfection of the human being. It presents itself as a contemporary articulation of an ancient wisdom-oriented project in which religious, philosophical, ethical, historical, and political claims are organised as a connected sequence from first principles to practical order. | |||
centred on the rule of intellect (''ʿaql''), the cultivation of wisdom (''ḥikmah''), and the perfection of the human being. Its ultimate aim is the global wellbeing, protection, and divinisation of humanity and other sentient beings, understood not as literal identity with God, but as the progressive actualisation of divine-like qualities such as wisdom, justice, mercy, truth, consciousness, self-mastery, and creative responsibility. | |||
HISTORY | |||
Hikmah Islam is the continuation — and internal reformulation — of the wider ancient Near Eastern and Mediterranean wisdom tradition, drawing a conceptual lineage from classical philosophy (Plato, Aristotle, Plotinus), late antique sapiential currents (including the Jesus movement’s emphasis on inner transformation and social justice), through Muḥammad’s proclamations, the teachings of his family and their inner circle companions, Islamic Golden Age philosophy ''(Arabic: فلسفة, romanised: falsafa)'' and mysticism ''(Arabic: عرفان, romanised: ʿirfān),'' and extending into modern philosophy of mind and science. | Hikmah Islam is the continuation — and internal reformulation — of the wider ancient Near Eastern and Mediterranean wisdom tradition, drawing a conceptual lineage from classical philosophy (Plato, Aristotle, Plotinus), late antique sapiential currents (including the Jesus movement’s emphasis on inner transformation and social justice), through Muḥammad’s proclamations, the teachings of his family and their inner circle companions, Islamic Golden Age philosophy ''(Arabic: فلسفة, romanised: falsafa)'' and mysticism ''(Arabic: عرفان, romanised: ʿirfān),'' and extending into modern philosophy of mind and science. | ||
Hikmah Islam presents itself as a developmental and universalising wisdom tradition. It traces its conceptual ancestry through ancient wisdom traditions, Greek philosophy, prophetic religion, Islamic revelation, Shiʿi ideas of guidance and authority, Islamic philosophy (''falsafah''), mysticism (''ʿirfān''), modern philosophy, political theory, and future inquiry. Its political expression is noocracy: the ordering of personal and collective life by intellect, wisdom, and the highest development of consciousness. | |||
Hikmah Islam traces a wisdom-oriented lineage through ancient philosophy and prophetic religion. Plato's philosopher-king is interpreted as an early philosophical articulation of rule by wisdom; Jesus is interpreted as an ethical and mystical embodiment of divine-like human perfection; and Muhammad is interpreted as the figure through whom prophetic wisdom, revelation, law, community, and civilisational order were historically established. The later development of Islamic philosophy, mysticism, and theology — from the Islamic Golden Age through figures such as Ibn Sīnā, Suhrawardī, Ibn ʿArabī, and Mullā Ṣadrā — is treated as a refinement of the metaphysical, psychological, and mystical dimensions of this project. | |||
Hikmah Islam also interprets modern political and intellectual history through the question of whether wisdom can be embodied institutionally. In this context, Ruhollah Khomeini is understood within the framework as a modern reviver of noocratic and wilāyah-based political order: the attempt to reconnect spiritual authority, legal reasoning, political sovereignty, and the governance of society by religious-intellectual leadership. Contemporary developments in philosophy, science, psychology, artificial intelligence, cosmology, and historical criticism are treated as continuing sites of refinement rather than threats to the tradition. | |||
{{WikiHikmah sidebar}} | {{WikiHikmah sidebar}} | ||
| Line 21: | Line 42: | ||
Hikmah Islam is characterised by an epistemic-led method. Rather than treating doctrine as a closed collection of inherited propositions, it arranges its positions as rational entailments: claims that are intended to follow from prior commitments concerning consciousness, intelligibility, truth, intellect, value, revelation, authority, and human development. Its stated aim is not merely the preservation of human life or identity, but the cultivation of divine-like human perfection through knowledge, virtue, self-mastery, consciousness, and just civilisational order. | Hikmah Islam is characterised by an epistemic-led method. Rather than treating doctrine as a closed collection of inherited propositions, it arranges its positions as rational entailments: claims that are intended to follow from prior commitments concerning consciousness, intelligibility, truth, intellect, value, revelation, authority, and human development. Its stated aim is not merely the preservation of human life or identity, but the cultivation of divine-like human perfection through knowledge, virtue, self-mastery, consciousness, and just civilisational order. | ||
| Line 27: | Line 48: | ||
The framework interprets many religious, philosophical, mythic, and cultural terms as symbolic or culturally mediated expressions of more abstract rational forms. These are organised into what the framework calls ''Hikmah comparative clusters''. Such clusters do not imply that terms from different traditions are historically identical, doctrinally interchangeable, or used in the same way by their original communities. Rather, they indicate concepts that Hikmah Islam interprets as converging upon, approximating, or partially expressing a shared underlying rational entailment when abstracted from their particular symbolic, confessional, and cultural forms. | The framework interprets many religious, philosophical, mythic, and cultural terms as symbolic or culturally mediated expressions of more abstract rational forms. These are organised into what the framework calls ''Hikmah comparative clusters''. Such clusters do not imply that terms from different traditions are historically identical, doctrinally interchangeable, or used in the same way by their original communities. Rather, they indicate concepts that Hikmah Islam interprets as converging upon, approximating, or partially expressing a shared underlying rational entailment when abstracted from their particular symbolic, confessional, and cultural forms. | ||
| Line 33: | Line 53: | ||
The framework presents the intellect as the governing principle of both personal and civilisational life. At the level of the self, this means the rule of intellect over appetite, ego, fear, fantasy, impulse, and inherited error through purification, self-mastery, education, initiation, discipline, and inner transformation. At the level of society, it means the ordering of civilisation by wisdom rather than by force, wealth, tribe, race, clerical formalism, mass appetite, or unexamined dogma. Hikmah Islam therefore treats religion, philosophy, myth, law, ritual, education, political authority, esoteric discipline, and institutional formation as historically variable instruments by which different societies may be guided toward higher consciousness and moral-intellectual development. | The framework presents the intellect as the governing principle of both personal and civilisational life. At the level of the self, this means the rule of intellect over appetite, ego, fear, fantasy, impulse, and inherited error through purification, self-mastery, education, initiation, discipline, and inner transformation. At the level of society, it means the ordering of civilisation by wisdom rather than by force, wealth, tribe, race, clerical formalism, mass appetite, or unexamined dogma. Hikmah Islam therefore treats religion, philosophy, myth, law, ritual, education, political authority, esoteric discipline, and institutional formation as historically variable instruments by which different societies may be guided toward higher consciousness and moral-intellectual development. | ||
A distinctive feature of Hikmah Islam is its use of rational entailments and comparative clusters. It attempts to organise religious, philosophical, ethical, political, and civilisational claims as a connected sequence from first principles of consciousness, intelligibility, and truth to the final aims of wisdom, noocracy, divine-likeness, and future sentient flourishing. It also interprets many religious, philosophical, mythic, and cultural terms as symbolic or historically clothed expressions of deeper rational forms. In this sense, Hikmah Islam is Islamic in root, mystical and philosophical in method, civilisational in scope, and oriented toward the future protection and perfection of humanity and sentient life, especially in the face of technological and artificial-intelligence-related risks. | A distinctive feature of Hikmah Islam is its use of rational entailments and comparative clusters. It attempts to organise religious, philosophical, ethical, political, and civilisational claims as a connected sequence from first principles of consciousness, intelligibility, and truth to the final aims of wisdom, noocracy, divine-likeness, and future sentient flourishing. It also interprets many religious, philosophical, mythic, and cultural terms as symbolic or historically clothed expressions of deeper rational forms. In this sense, Hikmah Islam is Islamic in root, mystical and philosophical in method, civilisational in scope, and oriented toward the future protection and perfection of humanity and sentient life, especially in the face of technological and artificial-intelligence-related risks. | ||