Main Page: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (60 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 146: | Line 146: | ||
Rationalist Muslims identify themselves as Khomeinists because they regard Rūḥollāh Khomeini as the figure who inaugurated the Revival Era through revolution, resistance, and the reanimation of the Muhammadan movement under modern conditions. This designation is strengthened by the fact that many adherents are near-contemporaries of that era and therefore understand it not merely as distant history, but as a living civilisational turning point. They venerate Khomeini for his emphasis on Muslim unity, his refusal to allow minor jurisprudential, and even certain doctrinal, differences to eclipse larger geopolitical and moral struggles, and his attempt to restore religion to the plane of historical agency. They also esteem his philosophy, mysticism, poetry, politics, geopolitical vision, anti-imperialism, his opposition to ethnosupremacy including Zionism, his unwavering dedication to the oppressed including Palestinians, Black people, and victims of Western hegemony, as well as his charisma, bidomainal genius, willingness to override rigid jurisprudential dogmatism, and for his commitment to the many modern challenges of anti-imperialist resistance economy. Rationalist Muslims often repeat a maxim when discussing the idea of the Philosopher King: Plato conceived it, Jesus tried it, Muḥammad achieved it, Khomeini revived it. | Rationalist Muslims identify themselves as Khomeinists because they regard Rūḥollāh Khomeini as the figure who inaugurated the Revival Era through revolution, resistance, and the reanimation of the Muhammadan movement under modern conditions. This designation is strengthened by the fact that many adherents are near-contemporaries of that era and therefore understand it not merely as distant history, but as a living civilisational turning point. They venerate Khomeini for his emphasis on Muslim unity, his refusal to allow minor jurisprudential, and even certain doctrinal, differences to eclipse larger geopolitical and moral struggles, and his attempt to restore religion to the plane of historical agency. They also esteem his philosophy, mysticism, poetry, politics, geopolitical vision, anti-imperialism, his opposition to ethnosupremacy including Zionism, his unwavering dedication to the oppressed including Palestinians, Black people, and victims of Western hegemony, as well as his charisma, bidomainal genius, willingness to override rigid jurisprudential dogmatism, and for his commitment to the many modern challenges of anti-imperialist resistance economy. Rationalist Muslims often repeat a maxim when discussing the idea of the Philosopher King: Plato conceived it, Jesus tried it, Muḥammad achieved it, Khomeini revived it. | ||
== | == Dialectical ladder == | ||
The method is named after Plato's ''dialektikē'' (διαλεκτική), or dialectic, and his search for an ''archē'' (ἀρχή), a first principle. Its opening is a Hikmati development rather than a quotation of Plato: the immediate datum of phenomenal consciousness, understood through the ancestral Platonic term ''psychē'' (ψυχή). From there it distinguishes logical conditions, epistemic commitments, proposed metaphysical conclusions, ethical commitments, practices of cultivation, social obligations, and institutional consequences. | The method is named after Plato's ''dialektikē'' (διαλεκτική), or dialectic, and his search for an ''archē'' (ἀρχή), a first principle. Its opening is a Hikmati development rather than a quotation of Plato: the immediate datum of phenomenal consciousness, understood through the ancestral Platonic term ''psychē'' (ψυχή). From there it distinguishes logical conditions, epistemic commitments, proposed metaphysical conclusions, ethical commitments, practices of cultivation, social obligations, and institutional consequences. | ||
| Line 156: | Line 156: | ||
'''Comparative qualification:''' Terms in the comparative lists are affinities or interpretive analogues, not assertions of historical identity. Duplicate or unusual terms appearing in the existing lists have deliberately been retained. | '''Comparative qualification:''' Terms in the comparative lists are affinities or interpretive analogues, not assertions of historical identity. Duplicate or unusual terms appearing in the existing lists have deliberately been retained. | ||
== | === 1. Psychē (Soul) === | ||
''Al-Nafs (النفس) • Ātman (आत्मन्) • Psychē (ψυχή)'' | |||
''“...one power, whether we should call it soul or something else, by which we perceive through these as instruments the objects of perception.”'' | |||
<br />- Plato, Theaetetus, 184d<br> | |||
<br />''“For it is through our souls that we are what we are, not through our bodies.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Kindī, Risāla fī al-Ḥīla li-Dafʿ al-Aḥzān (On Dispelling Sadness), § XIV.1 | |||
==== Phenomenal consciousness ==== | |||
Phenomenal consciousness is the subjective qualitative character of experience, including the felt character of perception, emotion and sensation. In plain language, what it feels like to see colour, experience pain or be aware at all. This is the opening datum, not a conclusion derived from earlier beliefs: even questioning experience occurs within experience. | |||
Since contemplation begins from the undeniable presence of experience, phenomenal consciousness is the first datum from which the architecture proceeds. the subjective, first-person "what it is like" experience of being alive, encompassing feelings, sensations, and perceptions like seeing color or feeling pain. | |||
Since contemplation begins from the undeniable presence of experience, phenomenal consciousness is the first datum from which the architecture proceeds. the subjective, first-person "what it is like" experience of being alive, encompassing feelings, sensations, and perceptions like seeing color or feeling pain | |||
''' | === 2. Gnōthi seauton (Know yourself) === | ||
''Ātma-jñāna (आत्मज्ञान) • Gnōthi seauton (γνῶθι σεαυτόν) • Maʿrifat al-nafs (معرفة النفس)'' | |||
''' | ''“And if the soul too, my dear Alcibiades, is to know herself, she must surely look at a soul.”'' | ||
<br />- [Plato], Alcibiades I, 133b<br> | |||
<br />''“He will not hesitate to affirm himself to exist.”'' | |||
<br />- Ibn Sīnā, Kitāb al-Shifāʾ, al-Nafs, I.1 | |||
==== Reflexive self-awareness ==== | |||
Reflexive self-awareness is conscious awareness directed at one's own ongoing mental activity, without necessarily presupposing a substantial or enduring ego. In plain language, noticing that one is aware, thinking or experiencing. Once experience is present, attention can turn toward experiencing itself; noticing this does not by itself establish a permanent, immaterial or substantial self. | |||
Acknowledgement of present experience permits, at minimum, awareness that experience is present; whether this establishes an enduring self is left open. | |||
''' | === 3. Heteron (The Other) === | ||
''Al-Ghayriyya (الغيرية) • Heteron (ἕτερον)'' | |||
< | ''“And other is always relative to other, is it not?”'' | ||
<br />- Plato, Sophist, 255d<br> | |||
<br />''“You know that what is affirmed is different from what is not affirmed.”'' | |||
<br />- Ibn Sīnā, Kitāb al-Shifāʾ, al-Nafs, I.1 | |||
==== Experiential differentiation ==== | |||
Experiences exhibit discernible differences, such as pain and colour. Therefore, inquiry already presupposes distinguishability. Difference in experience does not yet establish independent external substances. | |||
Experiential differentiation is the phenomenal discriminability of two or more experienced qualities, contents or episodes. In plain language, a sensation of red can be experienced as different from a sound or pain. Experience includes distinguishable qualities and contents; recognising their differences does not alone establish the existence of independently real external substances. | |||
=== 4. Tauton (Sameness) === | |||
''Al-Huwiyya (الهوية) • Tauton (ταὐτόν)'' | |||
< | ''“Each of them is, then, other than the remaining two, but the same as itself.”'' | ||
<br />- Plato, Sophist, 254e<br> | |||
<br />''“You know that what is affirmed is different from what is not affirmed.”'' | |||
<br />- Ibn Sīnā, Kitāb al-Shifāʾ, al-Nafs, I.1 | |||
''' | ==== Law of identity ==== | ||
Every being is identical with itself, and every proposition is what it is rather than something else. A thing cannot be treated as determinate unless it possesses some identity by virtue of which it is distinguishable from what it is not. Likewise, a proposition cannot be meaningful unless it has a stable content rather than collapsing into indeterminacy. | |||
The Law of Identity is therefore the most basic condition of intelligibility: without it, thought loses its object, language loses reference, and reasoning loses all determinate content. | |||
To recognise any distinguishable content as that content requires treating it as self-identical (A = A). This is a logical condition of coherent reference, not a derived empirical discovery. | |||
Law of identity is the classical logical principle that each entity is identical with itself and each determinate proposition retains its content. In plain language, a thing is itself, not something else, in the respect being discussed. Recognising something as a determinate experiential content presupposes treating it as that very content. Identity is therefore a condition of coherent recognition, not an observed physical law. | |||
=== 5. Peras (Limit) === | |||
''al-taʿayyun (التعيّن) • Peras (πέρας)'' | |||
''“...we must always assume that there is in every case one idea of everything and must look for it...”'' | |||
<br />- Plato, Philebus, 16d<br> | |||
<br />''“You know that what is affirmed is different from what is not affirmed.”'' | |||
<br />- Ibn Sīnā, Kitāb al-Shifāʾ, al-Nafs, I.1 | |||
==== Determinacy of content ==== | |||
The use of identity in discourse requires sufficiently determinate subject and predicate senses; otherwise a purported contradiction or entailment may be mere equivocation. | |||
Determinacy of content is the specification of a sufficiently definite meaning, boundary or identity to make a claim assessable. In plain language, we must know what a claim refers to before testing it. The use of identity in discourse requires sufficiently determinate subject and predicate senses; otherwise a purported contradiction or entailment may be mere equivocation. | |||
=== 6. Tauton tanantia (The same thing and opposites) === | |||
''ʿadam al-tanāquḍ (عدم التناقض) • Tauton tanantia (ταὐτὸν τἀναντία)'' | |||
''“It is obvious that the same thing will never do or suffer opposites in the same respect...”'' | |||
<br />- Plato, Republic, 436b–c<br> | |||
<br />''“You know that what is affirmed is different from what is not affirmed.”'' | |||
<br />- Ibn Sīnā, Kitāb al-Shifāʾ, al-Nafs, I.1 | |||
==== Law of non-contradiction ==== | |||
No entity or proposition can both possess and not possess the same attribute in the same respect at the same time. To deny this is not to embrace profundity, but to dissolve the distinction between affirmation and negation altogether. If contradiction were admissible at the level of principle, then no claim could be meaningfully excluded, no conclusion could be preferred to its negation, and reasoned judgement would become impossible. | |||
The Law of Non-Contradiction therefore safeguards coherence by preserving the difference between what is the case and what is not. | |||
Dialectical transition: Plato argues that the same thing cannot perform or undergo opposites simultaneously in the same respect (Republic 436b–c). The modern law of contradiction must distinguish strict contradictories from mere contraries; identity alone does not formally prove it. | |||
Law of non-contradiction is the classical prohibition on a proposition being both true and false in the same sense, time and respect. In plain language, the very same claim cannot be both affirmed and denied under identical conditions. Plato argues that the same thing cannot perform or undergo opposites simultaneously in the same respect (Republic 436b–c). The modern law of contradiction must distinguish strict contradictories from mere contraries; identity alone does not formally prove it. | |||
=== 7. On / mē on (Being and non-being) === | |||
''On / mē on (ὄν / μὴ ὄν) • qānūn al-thālith al-marfūʿ (قانون الثالث المرفوع)'' | |||
''“...not of something that is the opposite of being, but only of something different.”'' | |||
<br />- Plato, Sophist, 257b<br> | |||
<br />''“You know that what is affirmed is different from what is not affirmed.”'' | |||
<br />- Ibn Sīnā, Kitāb al-Shifāʾ, al-Nafs, I.1 | |||
==== Law of excluded middle ==== | |||
For any fully determinate proposition P under classical two-valued semantics, P or not-P. This does not follow from identity or non-contradiction alone in every logic; the classical semantic assumption must be declared. | |||
Law of excluded middle is the classical principle that every determinate proposition is either true or its negation is true. In plain language, for an ordinary definite claim, either it holds or it does not. For any fully determinate proposition P under classical two-valued semantics, P or not-P. This does not follow from identity or non-contradiction alone in every logic; the classical semantic assumption must be declared. | |||
=== 8. Alētheia (Truth) === | |||
''al-ḥaqq / al-ṣidq (الحق / الصدق) • Alētheia (ἀλήθεια) • Satya (सत्य)'' | |||
''“Theaetetus is sitting.”'' | |||
<br />- Plato, Sophist, 263a–b<br> | |||
<br />''“The aim of the philosopher is, as regards his knowledge, to attain the truth.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Kindī, Fī al-Falsafa al-Ūlā (On First Philosophy), I | |||
==== Alethic realism ==== | |||
Since phenomenal consciousness distinguishes between appearance, assertion, denial, error, and correction, the distinction between truth and falsehood is derived. asserting that the truth of beliefs, statements, or propositions is objective and determined by whether the world actually is as that statement claims, rather than depending on human minds. | |||
Dialectical transition: That appearance and judgement can diverge supplies a reason to distinguish what seems true from what is true. Mind-independent truth requires a further realist premise about correctness, not simply the existence of experience. | |||
Alethic realism is the thesis that truth is a property of claims determined by how things are, rather than by mere preference or endorsement. In plain language, believing or wanting something does not by itself make it true. That appearance and judgement can diverge supplies a reason to distinguish what seems true from what is true. Mind-independent truth requires a further realist premise about correctness, not simply the existence of experience. | |||
=== 9. Knowledge ''Epistēmē'' === | |||
''al-ʿilm (العلم) • Epistēmē (ἐπιστήμη)'' | |||
''“...true opinion along with an account is knowledge...”'' | |||
<br />- Plato, Theaetetus, 201d<br> | |||
<br />''“The aim of the philosopher is, as regards his knowledge, to attain the truth.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Kindī, Fī al-Falsafa al-Ūlā (On First Philosophy), I | |||
==== Epistemic realism ==== | |||
Since truth and falsehood are real distinctions, it is possible to know truth or at least approach it, hence Epistemic realism. | |||
Dialectical transition: If judgements can answer to truth, inquiry can aim at warranted true belief. The stronger claim that reliable knowledge is possible is supported by successful cognition, not deduced from the existence of truth alone. | |||
Epistemic realism is the commitment that knowledge of reality is possible, though particular claims may remain fallible. In plain language, people can genuinely learn things about the world. If judgements can answer to truth, inquiry can aim at warranted true belief. The stronger claim that reliable knowledge is possible is supported by successful cognition, not deduced from the existence of truth alone. | |||
=== 10. Dynamis / epistēmē (Capacity and knowledge) === | |||
''Buddhi (बुद्धि) • Dynamis / epistēmē (δύναμις / ἐπιστήμη) • quwwat al-idrāk / al-ʿaql (قوة الإدراك / العقل) • Discernment • Higher Mind • Light of Intelligence • Ratio Rationality Reason • Logos • Noetic Faculty • Nous • Understanding'' | |||
''“...one power, whether we should call it soul or something else, by which we perceive through these as instruments the objects of perception.”'' | |||
<br />- Plato, Theaetetus, 184d<br> | |||
<br />''“The aim of the philosopher is, as regards his knowledge, to attain the truth.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Kindī, Fī al-Falsafa al-Ūlā (On First Philosophy), I | |||
==== Epistemic capacity ==== | |||
Since it is possible to know truth or at least approach it, the human being must possess a capacity by which knowledge, judgement, and discernment are possible, hence Epistemic capacity. | |||
Dialectical transition: Successful episodes of knowing manifest capacities of perception, inference and correction. This is a modest inference to an exercised ability rather than to an infallible faculty. | |||
Epistemic capacity is the capacity to form, assess, retain and correct beliefs on the basis of perception and reasoning. In plain language, our ability to notice, learn, judge and revise. Successful episodes of knowing manifest capacities of perception, inference and correction. This is a modest inference to an exercised ability rather than to an infallible faculty. | |||
== 11. Logistikon, thymoeides, epithymētikon (Reasoning, spirit and appetite) == | |||
''al-quwā al-mudrika wa-l-ghaḍabiyya wa-l-shahwāniyya (القوى المدركة والغضبية والشهوانية) • Logistikon, thymoeides, epithymētikon (λογιστικόν, θυμοειδές, ἐπιθυμητικόν) • Hierarchy of faculties • Trilogy of mind • Tripartite soul'' | |||
''“...learn with one part of ourselves, feel anger with another, and with yet a third desire...”'' | |||
<br />- Plato, Republic, 436a–b<br> | |||
<br />''“The heart is like a bright mirror.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Ghazālī, Kīmiyā-yi Saʿādat (The Alchemy of Happiness), on the heart | |||
=== Cognitive–affective–conative triad === | |||
Since the human being must possess a capacity by which knowledge, judgement, and discernment are possible (Epistemic capacity), and since this capacity and other capacities, such as feeling and intention, are not identical (Law of identity), the human being is essentially composed of cognition (thinking), affect (feeling), and conation (doing), hence the Cognitive–affective–conative triad. | |||
Dialectical transition: Knowing, feeling and striving can be distinguished analytically, though real mental processes overlap; this modern tripartition should not be equated point-for-point with Plato’s three-part soul. | |||
Cognitive–affective–conative triad is a heuristic differentiation of cognitive, affective and conative psychological functions. In plain language, thinking, feeling and wanting are distinguishable aspects of mental life. Knowing, feeling and striving can be distinguished analytically, though real mental processes overlap; this modern tripartition should not be equated point-for-point with Plato’s three-part soul. | |||
== 12. Nous kai noēsis (Intellect and intellection) == | |||
''al-ʿaql / al-idrāk al-ʿaqlī (العقل / الإدراك العقلي) • Buddhi (बुद्धि) • Nous / noēsis (νοῦς / νόησις)'' | |||
''“...being well advised is, in itself, knowledge of some sort...”'' | |||
<br />- Plato, Republic, 428b<br> | |||
<br />''“The aim of the philosopher is, as regards his knowledge, to attain the truth.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Kindī, Fī al-Falsafa al-Ūlā (On First Philosophy), I | |||
=== Noetic discernment === | |||
Since the human being is essentially composed of the Cognitive–affective–conative triad, and since it must possess a capacity by which knowledge, judgement, and discernment are possible (Epistemic capacity), that capacity is the intellect, hence Noetic discernment. | |||
Among cognitive powers, intellect is the function that assesses reasons, identifies contradictions and integrates understanding. Its existence does not yet establish that its verdicts are always correct. | |||
Noetic discernment is rational apprehension and appraisal of intelligible relations, arguments and explanatory structures. In plain language, understanding reasons and recognising what follows from them. Among cognitive powers, intellect is the function that assesses reasons, identifies contradictions and integrates understanding. Its existence does not yet establish that its verdicts are always correct. | |||
== 13. Alētheian stergein (Love of truth) == | |||
''Alētheian stergein (ἀλήθειαν στέργειν) • ikhlāṣ / ṣidq / amāna (إخلاص / صدق / أمانة)'' | |||
''“...the hatred of it and the love of truth.”'' | |||
<br />- Plato, Republic, 485c<br> | |||
<br />''“The aim of the philosopher is, as regards his knowledge, to attain the truth.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Kindī, Fī al-Falsafa al-Ūlā (On First Philosophy), I | |||
=== Epistemic integrity === | |||
Preference for truth over comfort | |||
This disposition is the willingness to subordinate psychological ease, inherited familiarity, social approval, and personal convenience to what one has best reason to judge true. It entails a principled resistance to self-deception, motivated reasoning, sentimental attachment to falsehood, and the refusal to revise one’s position when evidence or argument requires it. Without such a preference, reason becomes merely instrumental: a tool for decorating prior loyalties rather than correcting them. | |||
Preference for truth over comfort is therefore the first moral discipline of the intellect, and the condition of all genuine intellectual integrity. Epistemic responsibility The obligation to proportion belief, action, and authority to truth, evidence, reasoning, and the limits of knowledge. Intellectual honesty; sincerity; ikhlāṣ; trustworthiness; verification; discipline; humility; evidence; accountability. | |||
Dialectical transition: A truth-seeking project cannot function without a willingness to revise treasured beliefs. This is a chosen conative commitment, not a theorem forced by logic alone. | |||
Epistemic integrity is a disposition to pursue and communicate truth while resisting bias, self-deception and unwarranted confidence. In plain language, preferring what is justified over what is comforting. A truth-seeking project cannot function without a willingness to revise treasured beliefs. This is a chosen conative commitment, not a theorem forced by logic alone. | |||
== 14. Dialektikē (Dialectic) == | |||
''al-jadal al-burhānī / al-burhān (الجدل البرهاني / البرهان) • Dialektikē (διαλεκτική)'' | |||
''“...to enable it to rise to that which requires no assumption and is the starting-point of all...”'' | |||
<br />- Plato, Republic, 511b<br> | |||
<br />''“The aim of the philosopher is, as regards his knowledge, to attain the truth.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Kindī, Fī al-Falsafa al-Ūlā (On First Philosophy), I | |||
=== Dialectic and rational entailment === | |||
Because claims must be connected by explicit reasons, inquiry tests hypotheses, seeks first principles and traces consequences. A historically Platonic label names the architecture without assuming that every intended step is deductively proven. | |||
Dialectic and rational entailment is a method of rational inquiry through defining concepts, testing alternatives and assessing arguments and consequences. In plain language, working through questions carefully rather than asserting answers. Because claims must be connected by explicit reasons, inquiry tests hypotheses, seeks first principles and traces consequences. A historically Platonic label names the architecture without assuming that every intended step is deductively proven. | |||
== 15. Logos (Reason) == | |||
''al-naẓar al-ʿaqlī (النظر العقلي) • Logos (λόγος)'' | |||
''“So I thought I must have recourse to conceptions and examine in them the truth of realities.”'' | |||
<br />- Plato, Phaedo, 99e<br> | |||
<br />''“The aim of the philosopher is, as regards his knowledge, to attain the truth.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Kindī, Fī al-Falsafa al-Ūlā (On First Philosophy), I | |||
=== Epistemological rationalism === | |||
Since intellect is the truth-discerning capacity (Noetic discernment), reason is treated as the primary method of judgement, correction, and justification, hence Epistemological rationalism. | |||
Dialectical transition: Reason supplies standards of consistency and inference; observation and testimony supply many premises. Primacy means rational adjudication, not replacing empirical evidence with speculation. | |||
Epistemological rationalism is the epistemological priority of argument and rational justification in judging claims, while permitting observation as evidence. In plain language, using reasoning to make sense of evidence. Reason supplies standards of consistency and inference; observation and testimony supply many premises. Primacy means rational adjudication, not replacing empirical evidence with speculation. | |||
== 16. Zētēsis (Inquiry) == | |||
''ijtihād / tawāḍuʿ maʿrifī (اجتهاد / تواضع معرفي) • Zētēsis (ζήτησις)'' | |||
''“...we shall be less inclined to think we know what we do not know at all...”'' | |||
<br />- Plato, Theaetetus, 187c<br> | |||
<br />''“...the one who suspects his faith in them and questions what he gathers from them...”'' | |||
<br />- Ibn al-Haytham, al-Shukūk ʿalā Baṭlamyūs (Doubts Concerning Ptolemy), introduction | |||
=== Epistemic fallibilism === | |||
Finite cognition can err even when it genuinely knows some truths; a method committed to truth must therefore distinguish justified confidence from infallibility and remain revisable. | |||
Epistemic fallibilism is the doctrine that human beliefs and justification remain open to correction even when well supported. In plain language, being willing to change one's mind when shown better reasons. Finite cognition can err even when it genuinely knows some truths; a method committed to truth must therefore distinguish justified confidence from infallibility and remain revisable. | |||
== 17. Diairesis (Division) == | |||
''Diairesis (διαίρεσις) • taqsīm al-ʿulūm (تقسيم العلوم)'' | |||
''“...a lover of these processes of division and bringing together, as aids to speech and thought...”'' | |||
<br />- Plato, Phaedrus, 266b<br> | |||
<br />''“...the one who suspects his faith in them and questions what he gathers from them...”'' | |||
<br />- Ibn al-Haytham, al-Shukūk ʿalā Baṭlamyūs (Doubts Concerning Ptolemy), introduction | |||
=== Methodological domain differentiation === | |||
Different objects call for different tests: argument for necessary claims, experiment for natural regularities, and source criticism for past human events. This modern method partition is compatible with Platonic differentiation but was not Plato’s own complete system. | |||
Methodological domain differentiation is the allocation of inquiry to different evidential and inferential methods appropriate to their subject matter. In plain language, use logic for logic, experiments for nature and source criticism for history. Different objects call for different tests: argument for necessary claims, experiment for natural regularities, and source criticism for past human events. This modern method partition is compatible with Platonic differentiation but was not Plato’s own complete system. | |||
== 18. Logos kai ousia (Reason and being) == | |||
''Logos / ousia (λόγος / οὐσία) • maʿqūliyyat al-wujūd (معقولية الوجود)'' | |||
''“...everything which becomes must of necessity become owing to some Cause...”'' | |||
<br />- Plato, Timaeus, 28a<br> | |||
<br />''“The aim of the philosopher is, as regards his knowledge, to attain the truth.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Kindī, Fī al-Falsafa al-Ūlā (On First Philosophy), I | |||
=== Metaphysical rationalism === | |||
Since intellect can know reality (Epistemological rationalism), reality itself is derived as intelligible rather than ultimately chaotic, arbitrary, or opaque to reason, hence Metaphysical rationalism. | |||
Dialectical transition: The success of intelligible inquiry supports confidence in knowable structure; perfect intelligibility or the absence of brute facts requires a stronger explanatory premise. | |||
Metaphysical rationalism is the metaphysical commitment that reality has intelligible structure susceptible, in principle, to rational explanation. In plain language, the world is not assumed to be fundamentally beyond explanation. The success of intelligible inquiry supports confidence in knowable structure; perfect intelligibility or the absence of brute facts requires a stronger explanatory premise. | |||
== 19. Aitia kai logos (Cause and explanation) == | |||
''Aitia / logos (αἰτία / λόγος) • al-ʿilla / al-taʿlīl (العلة / التعليل) • Hetu (हेतु) • Explanation • cause • ground • reason why • sufficient reason • causal order • intelligible ground • account • ʿillah'' | |||
''“...a cause is one thing, and the thing without which the cause could never be a cause is quite another thing.”'' | |||
<br />- Plato, Phaedo, 99b<br> | |||
<br />''“We do not find the truth we are seeking without finding a cause.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Kindī, Fī al-Falsafa al-Ūlā (On First Philosophy), I | |||
=== Principle of sufficient reason === | |||
Every real state of affairs has some reason or ground. | |||
Whatever is real is, in principle, intelligible: it has some reason, ground, or explanation for why it is rather than is not, even if that ground is intrinsic rather than external, simple rather than composite, or presently unknown to us. This minimal form of the Principle of Sufficient Reason does not assume that every explanation is easy, exhaustive, or immediately accessible. It asserts only that reality is not brute chaos. | |||
To affirm intelligibility is to affirm that existence is not finally resistant to reason, even where human understanding remains partial, provisional, or domain-limited. | |||
The demand that reality, events, beliefs, and claims be accountable to explanation rather than accepted as brute assertion. Explanation; cause; ground; reason why; sufficient reason; causal order; intelligible ground; account; ʿillah. | |||
Take as an explicit metaphysical commitment the minimal claim that every dependent fact has an adequate ground. Plato’s search for aitiai anticipates explanatory inquiry, not the complete modern PSR. | |||
Principle of sufficient reason is a grounding principle requiring an adequate explanation of dependent facts rather than allowing dependence to remain wholly brute. In plain language, ask what makes dependent things the case. Take as an explicit metaphysical commitment the minimal claim that every dependent fact has an adequate ground. Plato’s search for aitiai anticipates explanatory inquiry, not the complete modern PSR. | |||
== 20. Heteron (Otherness) == | |||
''al-imtiyāz / al-tamāyuz (الامتياز / التمايز) • Heteron (ἕτερον)'' | |||
''“And other is always relative to other, is it not?”'' | |||
<br />- Plato, Sophist, 255d<br> | |||
<br />''“You know that what is affirmed is different from what is not affirmed.”'' | |||
<br />- Ibn Sīnā, Kitāb al-Shifāʾ, al-Nafs, I.1 | |||
=== Principle of difference === | |||
ince every real fact requires a sufficient reason (Principle of sufficient reason), any real distinction must be grounded in something that makes the distinguished realities different. Two realities cannot be numerically distinct while possessing no differentiating feature, relation, limit, origin, structure, position, state, or mode of existence whatsoever. | |||
The Principle of difference therefore states: | |||
Every real difference requires a real difference-maker. For any realities x and y, if x is really distinct from y, there must be some real respect in which x differs from y and which grounds their non-identity. If no such differentiating ground exists, x and y are not really distinct. | |||
The principle distinguishes a real distinction from a merely conceptual distinction. The intellect may understand or describe one reality through several concepts without thereby multiplying that reality. For example, referring to something as both a cause and an existent does not by itself establish the existence of two separate things. Genuine plurality requires a real basis of individuation. | |||
The Principle of difference therefore excludes brute or groundless plurality. It also supports Ontological parsimony and later entails that an absolutely necessary reality cannot contain genuinely distinct components, properties, states, or internal divisions unless there is some ground differentiating them. Any such differentiating ground would introduce limitation, composition, or dependence and would therefore be incompatible with Necessary simplicity and Absolute necessary simplicity. | |||
Dialectical transition: Once differences can be identified, the stronger claim that every numerical difference has a real ontological difference-maker requires an additional grounding premise. It is stronger than the mere law of identity and faces objections from cases of allegedly indiscernible particulars; it cannot be derived from the PSR without argument. | |||
Principle of difference is a strong metaphysical thesis that numerical distinctions require an adequate real basis of differentiation. In plain language, genuinely different things must differ somehow, if this further principle is adopted. Once differences can be identified, the stronger claim that every numerical difference has a real ontological difference-maker requires an additional grounding premise. It is stronger than the mere law of identity and faces objections from cases of allegedly indiscernible particulars; it cannot be derived from the PSR without argument. | |||
== 21. Genesis kai methexis (Becoming and participation) == | |||
''al-imkān wa-l-iftiqār (الإمكان والافتقار) • Genesis / methexis (γένεσις / μέθεξις)'' | |||
''“What is that which is Existent always and has no Becoming?”'' | |||
<br />- Plato, Timaeus, 27d–28a<br> | |||
<br />''“We do not find the truth we are seeking without finding a cause.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Kindī, Fī al-Falsafa al-Ūlā (On First Philosophy), I | |||
=== Contingency and dependent existence === | |||
Some things exist but could, in principle, not have existed. | |||
There exist beings whose non-existence involves no contradiction, and whose actuality therefore does not arise from necessity contained wholly within themselves. Such beings are contingent: they are, but need not have been. Recognition of contingency is indispensable because it prevents the mind from mistaking mere actuality for necessity. It marks the distinction between what simply happens to exist and what must exist by virtue of its own nature. | |||
Once that distinction is recognised, the demand for explanation deepens: contingent beings cannot be their own ultimate sufficient reason. | |||
Objects whose existence depends on conditions provide instances of dependent existence. The precise modal claim that they could not have existed requires argument beyond observation. | |||
Contingency and dependent existence is the distinction between a necessary entity or fact and one that depends on conditions and might not have obtained. In plain language, some things exist only because other conditions obtain. Objects whose existence depends on conditions provide instances of dependent existence. The precise modal claim that they could not have existed requires argument beyond observation. | |||
== 22. Archē kai anhypotheton (First principle and the unhypothetical) == | |||
''Archē / anhypotheton (ἀρχή / ἀνυπόθετον) • manʿ al-dawr wa-l-tasalsul (منع الدور والتسلسل)'' | |||
''“...to enable it to rise to that which requires no assumption and is the starting-point of all...”'' | |||
<br />- Plato, Republic, 511b<br> | |||
<br />''“We do not find the truth we are seeking without finding a cause.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Kindī, Fī al-Falsafa al-Ūlā (On First Philosophy), I | |||
=== Non-circular grounding and rejection of vicious infinite regress === | |||
Explanation cannot be self-grounding in a viciously circular sense, nor can it be deferred without end through an infinite chain of merely derivative dependence. A circle explains nothing if each member depends for its intelligibility on the others while none possesses self-sufficiency; likewise, an endless regress of dependent explanations never arrives at an actual ground. | |||
For explanation to succeed, a chain of dependence must terminate in that which is not merely borrowed, conditioned, or derivative, but self-sufficient. Without such termination, explanation is only postponed, not achieved. | |||
A circular chain in which every member borrows its grounding fails to explain itself. Whether every infinite dependence chain is vicious requires a separate well-foundedness principle. | |||
Non-circular grounding and rejection of vicious infinite regress is the denial of viciously circular explanation and, under a further well-foundedness assumption, endlessly ungrounded derivative chains. In plain language, a series of borrowed explanations cannot by itself explain why anything is grounded. A circular chain in which every member borrows its grounding fails to explain itself. Whether every infinite dependence chain is vicious requires a separate well-foundedness principle. | |||
== 23. Archē (First principle) == | |||
''al-mabādiʾ al-ūlā (المبادئ الأولى) • Archē (ἀρχή)'' | |||
''“...to enable it to rise to that which requires no assumption and is the starting-point of all...”'' | |||
<br />- Plato, Republic, 511b<br> | |||
<br />''“The aim of the philosopher is, as regards his knowledge, to attain the truth.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Kindī, Fī al-Falsafa al-Ūlā (On First Philosophy), I | |||
=== Foundationalism === | |||
Since explanation cannot regress indefinitely without grounding (Principle of sufficient reason), inquiry is directed toward first principles, hence Foundationalism. | |||
Dialectical transition: The demand not to rely entirely on unsupported premises motivates searching for foundational commitments; whether all justification must terminate is itself a debated epistemological choice. | |||
Foundationalism is an epistemological approach locating ultimate justification in basic claims or principles not justified by an endless chain. In plain language, reasoning seeks starting points that do not merely borrow support forever. The demand not to rely entirely on unsupported premises motivates searching for foundational commitments; whether all justification must terminate is itself a debated epistemological choice. | |||
== 24. Haploun (Simple) == | |||
''Haploun (ἁπλοῦν) • iqtiṣād fī al-furūḍ (اقتصاد في الفروض)'' | |||
''“...a cause is one thing, and the thing without which the cause could never be a cause is quite another thing.”'' | |||
<br />- Plato, Phaedo, 99b<br> | |||
<br />''“The aim of the philosopher is, as regards his knowledge, to attain the truth.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Kindī, Fī al-Falsafa al-Ūlā (On First Philosophy), I | |||
=== Epistemic parsimony === | |||
Since inquiry seeks grounded explanation (Principle of sufficient reason and Foundationalism), assumptions should not be multiplied beyond necessity, hence Epistemic parsimony. | |||
Dialectical transition: When explanations fit the same evidence equally well, preferring the one with fewer unsupported assumptions is a defeasible research rule rather than a logical axiom. | |||
Epistemic parsimony is the methodological preference for fewer unsupported assumptions when rival explanations otherwise perform comparably. In plain language, do not add complications that explain nothing. When explanations fit the same evidence equally well, preferring the one with fewer unsupported assumptions is a defeasible research rule rather than a logical axiom. | |||
== 25. Hikanon (Sufficient) == | |||
''Hikanon (ἱκανόν) • kifāyat al-taʿlīl (كفاية التعليل)'' | |||
''“...a cause is one thing, and the thing without which the cause could never be a cause is quite another thing.”'' | |||
<br />- Plato, Phaedo, 99b<br> | |||
<br />''“The aim of the philosopher is, as regards his knowledge, to attain the truth.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Kindī, Fī al-Falsafa al-Ūlā (On First Philosophy), I | |||
=== Principle of explanatory adequacy === | |||
A proposed ultimate ground must explain—rather than merely rename—the dependent features it is invoked to ground. The explanatory burden is especially important for consciousness; the ground need not simply instantiate every property of its consequences. | |||
Principle of explanatory adequacy is the demand that an explanation actually account for the features it purports to explain. In plain language, giving a mystery a new name is not solving it. A proposed ultimate ground must explain—rather than merely rename—the dependent features it is invoked to ground. The explanatory burden is especially important for consciousness; the ground need not simply instantiate every property of its consequences. | |||
== 26. Hen kai haploun (One and simple) == | |||
''al-basāṭa / waḥdat al-aṣl (البساطة / وحدة الأصل) • Hen / haploun (ἕν / ἁπλοῦν)'' | |||
''“...the original unit is one and many and infinite...”'' | |||
<br />- Plato, Philebus, 16d<br> | |||
<br />''“The aim of the philosopher is, as regards his knowledge, to attain the truth.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Kindī, Fī al-Falsafa al-Ūlā (On First Philosophy), I | |||
=== Ontological parsimony === | |||
Since unnecessary assumptions should be avoided (Epistemic parsimony), ultimate entities, substances, and principles should not be multiplied beyond necessity, hence Ontological parsimony. | |||
Dialectical transition: The preference for an explanatorily unified ontology is a defeasible constraint; it does not entail that only one substance exists without further premises. | |||
Ontological parsimony is the ontological preference for positing no more kinds of fundamental entities than explanatory adequacy requires. In plain language, avoid unnecessary fundamental things. The preference for an explanatorily unified ontology is a defeasible constraint; it does not entail that only one substance exists without further premises. | |||
== 27. Proteron kai aitia (Priority and cause) == | |||
''al-taqaddum al-wujūdī (التقدم الوجودي) • Proteron / aitia (πρότερον / αἰτία)'' | |||
''“...it is beyond being, exceeding it in dignity and power.”'' | |||
<br />- Plato, Republic, 509b<br> | |||
<br />''“The aim of the philosopher is, as regards his knowledge, to attain the truth.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Kindī, Fī al-Falsafa al-Ūlā (On First Philosophy), I | |||
=== Ontological priority === | |||
Since some realities explain others more basically than they are explained by them (Epistemic parsimony and Ontological parsimony), reality is ordered according to what is fundamental and what is derivative, hence Ontological priority. | |||
Dialectical transition: When A explains B without the reverse dependence, A is prior in grounding, not necessarily earlier in time. | |||
Ontological priority is the asymmetric dependence relation by which something is more fundamental than what it grounds. In plain language, what explains another thing may be prior without being earlier in time. When A explains B without the reverse dependence, A is prior in grounding, not necessarily earlier in time. | |||
== 28. Psychē kai nous (Soul and intellect) == | |||
''al-nafs / al-shuʿūr (النفس / الشعور) • Psychē / nous (ψυχή / νοῦς)'' | |||
''“...one power, whether we should call it soul or something else, by which we perceive through these as instruments the objects of perception.”'' | |||
<br />- Plato, Theaetetus, 184d<br> | |||
<br />''“He will not hesitate to affirm himself to exist.”'' | |||
<br />- Ibn Sīnā, Kitāb al-Shifāʾ, al-Nafs, I.1 | |||
=== Non-reductive consciousness === | |||
Since consciousness is the condition under which all objects, methods, and explanations appear (Phenomenal consciousness), and since ultimate entities, substances, and principles should not be multiplied beyond necessity (Ontological parsimony), consciousness cannot be treated merely as one ordinary object among others, hence Non-reductive consciousness. | |||
No third-person description by itself establishes why subjective character occurs; the explanatory gap motivates but does not prove non-reduction. | |||
Non-reductive consciousness is the thesis that phenomenal consciousness cannot be exhaustively identified with a purely third-person functional or physical account. In plain language, describing a mechanism does not automatically explain why experience feels like anything. No third-person description by itself establishes why subjective character occurs; the explanatory gap motivates but does not prove non-reduction. | |||
== 29. Psychē kai noēton (Soul and the intelligible) == | |||
''aṣālat al-idrāk / aṣālat al-shuʿūr (أصالة الإدراك / أصالة الشعور) • Psychē / noēton (ψυχή / νοητόν)'' | |||
''“...one power, whether we should call it soul or something else, by which we perceive through these as instruments the objects of perception.”'' | |||
<br />- Plato, Theaetetus, 184d<br> | |||
<br />''“He will not hesitate to affirm himself to exist.”'' | |||
<br />- Ibn Sīnā, Kitāb al-Shifāʾ, al-Nafs, I.1 | |||
=== Priority of consciousness === | |||
Since consciousness is the first datum and the condition of intelligibility (Phenomenal consciousness), consciousness is treated as prior in explanation to what appears within it, hence the Priority of consciousness. | |||
Dialectical transition: Epistemic priority is immediate; ontological priority is a proposed stronger conclusion requiring an anti-physicalist or explanatory argument. | |||
Priority of consciousness is the proposed ontological or explanatory primacy of consciousness, distinguished from its uncontroversial priority as a datum of inquiry. In plain language, experience is where investigation begins, but that alone does not prove all reality is mental. Epistemic priority is immediate; ontological priority is a proposed stronger conclusion requiring an anti-physicalist or explanatory argument. | |||
== 30. Ousia kai psychē (Being and soul) == | |||
''Ousia / psychē (οὐσία / ψυχή) • waḥdat al-ḥuḍūr wa-l-wujūd (وحدة الحضور والوجود)'' | |||
''“...intelligence could not be present in anything which was devoid of soul.”'' | |||
<br />- Plato, Timaeus, 30b<br> | |||
<br />''“He will not hesitate to affirm himself to exist.”'' | |||
<br />- Ibn Sīnā, Kitāb al-Shifāʾ, al-Nafs, I.1 | |||
=== Consciousness–existence non-separability === | |||
Under the proposed model, consciousness is not an accidental property added to an independently intelligible substrate but existence disclosed from within. The identification must be supported independently rather than defined into truth. | |||
Consciousness–existence non-separability is the metaphysical proposal that being and conscious disclosure are inseparable aspects of ultimate reality. In plain language, on this model, existence is not finally something standing outside all awareness. Under the proposed model, consciousness is not an accidental property added to an independently intelligible substrate but existence disclosed from within. The identification must be supported independently rather than defined into truth. | |||
== 31 Intelligible and soul ''Noēton / psychē'' == | |||
''al-mithāliyya al-taḥlīliyya (المثالية التحليلية) • Noēton / psychē (νοητόν / ψυχή)'' | |||
''“...intelligence could not be present in anything which was devoid of soul.”'' | |||
<br />- Plato, Timaeus, 30b<br> | |||
<br />''“He will not hesitate to affirm himself to exist.”'' | |||
<br />- Ibn Sīnā, Kitāb al-Shifāʾ, al-Nafs, I.1 | |||
=== Analytic idealism === | |||
'''Analytic idealism''' is an idealist metaphysics treating the physical domain as grounded in or constituted by consciousness rather than an independent unconscious substrate. In plain language, matter is understood through consciousness rather than consciousness through matter alone. If consciousness suffices to ground the phenomena and an independent unconscious substance supplies no additional explanation, a consciousness-first ontology becomes parsimonious; this remains an inference to the best explanation, not a strict deduction. | |||
== 32 Ascent and intellection ''Anabasis / noēsis'' == | |||
''Anabasis / noēsis (ἀνάβασις / νόησις) • tashkīk al-shuʿūr (تشكيك الشعور)'' | |||
''“...the power and capacity of learning exists in the soul already...”'' | |||
<br />- Plato, Republic, 518c<br> | |||
<br />''“...truth does not oppose truth but accords with it and bears witness to it.”'' | |||
<br />- Ibn Rushd, Faṣl al-Maqāl (The Decisive Treatise), §10 | |||
=== Gradation of consciousness === | |||
'''Gradation of consciousness''' is a proposed ordering of conscious manifestation by degrees or modes of integration, clarity, agency or complexity. In plain language, consciousness can be more or less integrated, though no universal scale is yet proved. Observable variation in the capacities and structures of conscious states motivates distinctions of grade, but a single metaphysical scale is an additional interpretive claim. Tashkīk al-shuʿūr is a proposed contemporary adaptation, not an attested Platonic or Ṣadrian doctrine. | |||
== 33 Being and participation ''Ousia / methexis'' == | |||
''Ousia / methexis (οὐσία / μέθεξις) • tashkīk al-wujūd (تشكيك الوجود)'' | |||
''“What is that which is Existent always and has no Becoming?”'' | |||
<br />- Plato, Timaeus, 27d–28a<br> | |||
<br />''“...truth does not oppose truth but accords with it and bears witness to it.”'' | |||
<br />- Ibn Rushd, Faṣl al-Maqāl (The Decisive Treatise), §10 | |||
=== Gradation of existence === | |||
'''Gradation of existence''' is an ontology in which existence is understood as admitting derivative grades or intensities of reality. In plain language, being is proposed to occur in hierarchies of dependence or manifestation. Only if the consciousness–existence identity is independently established can grades of conscious being count as grades of existence. Mullā Ṣadrā is a later and more direct interlocutor than Plato. | |||
== 34 First principle and the unhypothetical ''Archē / anhypotheton'' == | |||
''Archē / anhypotheton (ἀρχή / ἀνυπόθετον) • wājib al-wujūd bi-dhātihi (واجب الوجود بذاته)'' | |||
''“...to enable it to rise to that which requires no assumption and is the starting-point of all...”'' | |||
<br />- Plato, Republic, 511b<br> | |||
<br />''“The True One exists necessarily.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Kindī, Fī al-Falsafa al-Ūlā (On First Philosophy), I | |||
=== Necessary existent and ultimate grounding === | |||
'''Necessary existent and ultimate grounding''' is a reality whose nonexistence is metaphysically impossible and on which dependent reality ultimately rests. In plain language, the proposed ultimate ground does not itself need an external explanation. Given dependent realities, a sufficiently strong grounding principle and non-vicious regress premise yield a proposed necessary ground. The characteristics of that ground require further arguments. | |||
== 35 The One and the Good ''To Hen / Agathon'' == | |||
''al-ḥayy al-qayyūm / wājib al-wujūd (الحي القيوم / واجب الوجود) • Brahman (ब्रह्मन्) • Dào (道) • To Hen / Agathon (τὸ ἕν / ἀγαθόν)'' | |||
''“...it is beyond being, exceeding it in dignity and power.”'' | |||
<br />- Plato, Republic, 509b<br> | |||
<br />''“The True One exists necessarily.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Kindī, Fī al-Falsafa al-Ūlā (On First Philosophy), I | |||
=== Meta-Consciousness === | |||
'''Meta-Consciousness''' is the Hikmati name for ultimate, unconditioned consciousness conceived as the absolute ground of derivative experience and existence. In plain language, the model calls the fundamental conscious ground Meta-Consciousness. If ultimate grounding must explain consciousness and no distinct unconscious basis is justified, the model identifies the unconditioned ground as Meta-Consciousness. Plato’s Good and Plotinus’s One should not be silently equated with phenomenal awareness. | |||
== 36 One and participation ''Hen / methexis'' == | |||
''Advaita (अद्वैत) • Hen / methexis (ἕν / μέθεξις) • waḥdat al-wujūd al-muqayyada (وحدة الوجود المقيّدة)'' | |||
''“...the original unit is one and many and infinite...”'' | |||
<br />- Plato, Philebus, 16d<br> | |||
<br />''“The True One exists necessarily.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Kindī, Fī al-Falsafa al-Ūlā (On First Philosophy), I | |||
=== Qualified ontological monism === | |||
'''Qualified ontological monism''' is the view that there is one fundamental reality while derivative differentiation remains meaningful. In plain language, many real expressions depend on one ultimate ground. A single fundamental conscious ground can underwrite genuine derivative plurality without reducing distinctions to sheer illusion. The particular Arabic heading here is a modern descriptive formation, not an established quotation from Ibn ʿArabī. | |||
== 37 Cause and first principle ''Aitia / archē'' == | |||
''Aitia / archē (αἰτία / ἀρχή) • al-qayyūmiyya / al-ʿilliyya al-ʿāmma (القيومية / العلية العامة)'' | |||
''“...a cause is one thing, and the thing without which the cause could never be a cause is quite another thing.”'' | |||
<br />- Plato, Phaedo, 99b<br> | |||
<br />''“We do not find the truth we are seeking without finding a cause.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Kindī, Fī al-Falsafa al-Ūlā (On First Philosophy), I | |||
=== Omnigrounding === | |||
'''Omnigrounding''' is the doctrine that a fundamental reality grounds every dependent existent or fact, without being represented as performing every possible action. In plain language, ultimate reality explains all dependent reality rather than acting like a superhuman agent. The ultimate is conceived as that on which all dependent reality ontologically relies, rather than as a humanlike agent performing every possible action. Omnigrounding does not assert the ability to perform logically incoherent tasks. | |||
== 38 Simple ''Haploun'' == | |||
''al-basāṭa al-ilāhiyya (البساطة الإلهية) • Haploun (ἁπλοῦν)'' | |||
''“What is that which is Existent always and has no Becoming?”'' | |||
<br />- Plato, Timaeus, 27d–28a<br> | |||
<br />''“The True One exists necessarily.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Kindī, Fī al-Falsafa al-Ūlā (On First Philosophy), I | |||
=== Necessary simplicity === | |||
'''Necessary simplicity''' is the thesis that ultimate necessary reality lacks metaphysical parts whose assembly or coordination would require explanation. In plain language, the ultimate ground cannot depend on pieces put together. A composite whose constituents explain its unity would be dependent in that respect; under a stringent ultimacy condition the ground must therefore be non-composite. Other views of composition must be evaluated. | |||
== 39 Simple and the One ''Haploun / to Hen'' == | |||
''al-basāṭa al-muṭlaqa (البساطة المطلقة) • Haploun / to Hen (ἁπλοῦν / τὸ ἕν)'' | |||
''“...it is beyond being, exceeding it in dignity and power.”'' | |||
<br />- Plato, Republic, 509b<br> | |||
<br />''“The True One exists necessarily.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Kindī, Fī al-Falsafa al-Ūlā (On First Philosophy), I | |||
=== Absolute necessary simplicity === | |||
'''Absolute necessary simplicity''' is the stronger doctrine that ultimate reality contains no real distinction between its intrinsic essence, being and act. In plain language, the ultimate would have no internal components or separable activities. The stronger identity of essence, existence and intrinsic act requires an account explaining why such distinctions cannot be real in the ultimate; the Principle of Difference and non-composition supply candidate premises. | |||
== 40 Necessity ''Anankē'' == | |||
''al-ījāb al-dhātī / al-ḍarūra (الإيجاب الذاتي / الضرورة) • Anankē (ἀνάγκη)'' | |||
''“...everything which becomes must of necessity become owing to some Cause...”'' | |||
<br />- Plato, Timaeus, 28a<br> | |||
<br />''“The True One exists necessarily.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Kindī, Fī al-Falsafa al-Ūlā (On First Philosophy), I | |||
=== Necessitarianism === | |||
'''Necessitarianism''' is the modal thesis that all reality, given its complete fundamental ground and laws, obtains necessarily. In plain language, on this account nothing about the complete order could ultimately have been otherwise. If the simple ground contains no real unrealised alternatives and its procession is intrinsic, its total grounding relation is proposed to be necessary. Divine simplicity alone does not settle every modal dispute. | |||
== 41 Eternity ''Aiōn'' == | |||
''Aiōn (αἰών) • al-lā-zamāniyya / al-dahr (اللازمانية / الدهر)'' | |||
''“...a moving image of eternity...”'' | |||
<br />- Plato, Timaeus, 37d<br> | |||
<br />''“The True One exists necessarily.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Kindī, Fī al-Falsafa al-Ūlā (On First Philosophy), I | |||
=== Atemporality === | |||
'''Atemporality''' is existence without temporal succession, passage or location at a particular time. In plain language, not having a before, an after or a changing present. A simple changeless ground can be conceived as outside temporal succession; necessitarianism alone does not entail timelessness without a further account of time and change. | |||
== 42 Image and model ''Eikōn / paradeigma'' == | |||
''Eikōn / paradeigma (εἰκών / παράδειγμα) • fayḍ / tajallī / ṣudūr (فيض / تجلّي / صدور)'' | |||
''“...intelligence could not be present in anything which was devoid of soul.”'' | |||
<br />- Plato, Timaeus, 30b<br> | |||
<br />''“We do not find the truth we are seeking without finding a cause.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Kindī, Fī al-Falsafa al-Ūlā (On First Philosophy), I | |||
=== Conscientiation ex conscientia === | |||
'''Conscientiation ex conscientia''' is the proposed grounding of finite conscious modes in a fundamental conscious reality. In plain language, consciousness gives rise to differentiated manifestations of consciousness, not independently existing matter. If ultimate reality is conscious and wholly grounding, derivative being is interpreted as grounded expression of consciousness, not manufacture from independent matter. The precise procession model still requires argument. | |||
== 43 One ''Hen'' == | |||
''Hen (ἕν) • qāʿidat al-wāḥid (قاعدة الواحد)'' | |||
''“...the original unit is one and many and infinite...”'' | |||
<br />- Plato, Philebus, 16d<br> | |||
<br />''“The True One exists necessarily.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Kindī, Fī al-Falsafa al-Ūlā (On First Philosophy), I | |||
=== Rule of one === | |||
'''Rule of one''' is the classical emanationist thesis that from an absolutely one cause, considered precisely as one, only one first effect proceeds immediately. In plain language, the first step from complete unity is held to be one, not many. The rule “from one qua one only one immediately proceeds” is distinctly developed in Islamic emanationist philosophy; to call it necessary one must exclude direct but differentiated grounding relations. | |||
== 44 Intellect ''Nous'' == | |||
''al-ʿaql al-awwal (العقل الأول) • Nous (νοῦς)'' | |||
''“...intelligence could not be present in anything which was devoid of soul.”'' | |||
<br />- Plato, Timaeus, 30b<br> | |||
<br />''“The True One exists necessarily.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Kindī, Fī al-Falsafa al-Ūlā (On First Philosophy), I | |||
=== First conscientiate === | |||
'''First conscientiate''' is the proposed first dependent intellect or conscious expression immediately grounded in the ultimate source. In plain language, the first non-ultimate expression of conscious being. Given the Rule of One and conscious grounding, the first dependent intelligible reality is described as first intellect; competing emanation models require comparison. | |||
== 45 Participation and mediation ''Methexis / meson'' == | |||
''al-ʿuqūl al-mufāriqa / al-malāʾika (العقول المفارقة / الملائكة) • Methexis / meson (μέθεξις / μέσον)'' | |||
''“...the original unit is one and many and infinite...”'' | |||
<br />- Plato, Philebus, 16d<br> | |||
<br />''“We do not find the truth we are seeking without finding a cause.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Kindī, Fī al-Falsafa al-Ūlā (On First Philosophy), I | |||
=== Intermediary conscientiates === | |||
'''Intermediary conscientiates''' is a hierarchical thesis positing intermediary grades of derived intellect or conscious manifestation. In plain language, intermediate levels connect the ultimate ground to diverse finite experiences. A hierarchy of derivative grounds is a coherent explanatory model, but the number and necessity of intermediaries cannot be established merely by naming differentiation. | |||
== 46 Cosmos and the sensible ''Kosmos / aisthēton'' == | |||
''al-ʿālam al-maḥsūs / al-dunyā (العالم المحسوس / الدنيا) • Kosmos / aisthēton (κόσμος / αἰσθητόν)'' | |||
''“What is that which is Existent always and has no Becoming?”'' | |||
<br />- Plato, Timaeus, 27d–28a<br> | |||
<br />''“He who acquires knowledge and acts up to it and teaches it to the people is noble to the angels of heaven and earth.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Ghazālī, Iḥyāʾ ʿUlūm al-Dīn (Revival of the Religious Sciences), Book I | |||
=== Observable universe === | |||
'''Observable universe''' is the empirically accessible domain of objects, events and regularities studied by natural science. In plain language, the world we observe and measure. Experience confronts observers with stable patterns of apparent material multiplicity. The world’s proposed grounding in consciousness need not interfere with empirical investigation of those patterns. | |||
== 47 Perception and experience ''Aisthēsis / empeiria'' == | |||
''Aisthēsis / empeiria (αἴσθησις / ἐμπειρία) • al-tajriba / al-mushāhada (التجربة / المشاهدة)'' | |||
''“...one power, whether we should call it soul or something else, by which we perceive through these as instruments the objects of perception.”'' | |||
<br />- Plato, Theaetetus, 184d<br> | |||
<br />''“...the one who suspects his faith in them and questions what he gathers from them...”'' | |||
<br />- Ibn al-Haytham, al-Shukūk ʿalā Baṭlamyūs (Doubts Concerning Ptolemy), introduction | |||
=== Physical empiricism === | |||
'''Physical empiricism''' is the epistemological policy that claims about observable nature should answer to sensory and instrument-mediated evidence. In plain language, look at the evidence for claims about the physical world. Claims about observable regularities must ultimately answer to systematic observation and experiment. Plato is a precursor in classifying kinds of cognition, not the founder of the modern experimental method. | |||
== 48 Inquiry and cause ''Zētēsis / aitia'' == | |||
''al-manhaj al-tajrībī (المنهج التجريبي) • Zētēsis / aitia (ζήτησις / αἰτία)'' | |||
''“...everything which becomes must of necessity become owing to some Cause...”'' | |||
<br />- Plato, Timaeus, 28a<br> | |||
<br />''“...the one who suspects his faith in them and questions what he gathers from them...”'' | |||
<br />- Ibn al-Haytham, al-Shukūk ʿalā Baṭlamyūs (Doubts Concerning Ptolemy), introduction | |||
=== Experimental scientific method === | |||
'''Experimental scientific method''' is systematic inquiry using controlled tests, predictions, measurement, replication and revision to evaluate empirical hypotheses. In plain language, test natural-world explanations rather than relying on assertion. When a causal natural-world claim makes testable predictions, controlled observation, experiment, replication and quantification are appropriate means of discrimination. | |||
== 49 Soul and body ''Psychē / sōma'' == | |||
''ʿilm al-aʿṣāb al-maʿrifī (علم الأعصاب المعرفي) • Psychē / sōma (ψυχή / σῶμα)'' | |||
''“...learn with one part of ourselves, feel anger with another, and with yet a third desire...”'' | |||
<br />- Plato, Republic, 436a–b<br> | |||
<br />''“...the one who suspects his faith in them and questions what he gathers from them...”'' | |||
<br />- Ibn al-Haytham, al-Shukūk ʿalā Baṭlamyūs (Doubts Concerning Ptolemy), introduction | |||
=== Cognitive neuroscience and embodied cognition === | |||
'''Cognitive neuroscience and embodied cognition''' is the interdisciplinary study of cognition as realised in brain, body and environment, without assuming that this exhausts phenomenology. In plain language, study how bodies and nervous systems enable thinking and experience. Because cognitive function varies with bodily and neural conditions, science should investigate mechanisms without presupposing that mechanisms exhaust phenomenal experience. | |||
== 50 Time and eternity ''Chronos / aiōn'' == | |||
''Chronos / aiōn (χρόνος / αἰών) • naẓariyyat al-zaman bilā ḥāḍir mumtāz (نظرية الزمان بلا حاضر ممتاز)'' | |||
''“...a moving image of eternity...”'' | |||
<br />- Plato, Timaeus, 37d<br> | |||
<br />''“He who acquires knowledge and acts up to it and teaches it to the people is noble to the angels of heaven and earth.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Ghazālī, Iḥyāʾ ʿUlūm al-Dīn (Revival of the Religious Sciences), Book I | |||
=== B-theory of time === | |||
'''B-theory of time''' is the tenseless account of time according to which earlier-than and later-than relations do not involve an objectively moving present. In plain language, time need not contain a universal now that moves. B-theory treats earlier/later relations as fundamental and denies an objective moving present. It is compatible with eternalism but not logically equivalent to it. | |||
== 51 Eternity and time ''Aiōn / chronos'' == | |||
''Aiōn / chronos (αἰών / χρόνος) • al-azaliyya / al-abadiyya (الأزلية / الأبدية)'' | |||
''“...a moving image of eternity...”'' | |||
<br />- Plato, Timaeus, 37d<br> | |||
<br />''“He who acquires knowledge and acts up to it and teaches it to the people is noble to the angels of heaven and earth.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Ghazālī, Iḥyāʾ ʿUlūm al-Dīn (Revival of the Religious Sciences), Book I | |||
=== Eternalism === | |||
'''Eternalism''' is the metaphysics of time in which past, present and future events are equally real. In plain language, every temporal location belongs to the real temporal structure. On a tenseless model, all temporal locations are equally real. Atemporality of the ultimate does not by itself prove eternalism about the derivative universe. | |||
== 52 Necessity and cause ''Anankē / aitia'' == | |||
''al-ḥatmiyya / al-jabr al-sababī (الحتمية / الجبر السببي) • Anankē / aitia (ἀνάγκη / αἰτία)'' | |||
''“The blame is his who chooses: God is blameless.”'' | |||
<br />- Plato, Republic, 617e<br> | |||
<br />''“He who acquires knowledge and acts up to it and teaches it to the people is noble to the angels of heaven and earth.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Ghazālī, Iḥyāʾ ʿUlūm al-Dīn (Revival of the Religious Sciences), Book I | |||
=== Determinism === | |||
'''Determinism''' is the thesis that the state of a system together with the laws or complete determining conditions fixes its outcomes. In plain language, given exactly the same total conditions, events cannot turn out differently. A block-universe ontology does not by itself establish deterministic laws. The claim that every event is fixed by its grounding and antecedent conditions needs its own causal premise. | |||
== 53 Reason and wish ''Logistikon / boulēsis'' == | |||
''al-ikhtiyār al-muwāfiq li-l-ḥatmiyya (الاختيار الموافق للحتمية) • Logistikon / boulēsis (λογιστικόν / βούλησις)'' | |||
''“The blame is his who chooses: God is blameless.”'' | |||
<br />- Plato, Republic, 617e<br> | |||
<br />''“He who acquires knowledge and acts up to it and teaches it to the people is noble to the angels of heaven and earth.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Ghazālī, Iḥyāʾ ʿUlūm al-Dīn (Revival of the Religious Sciences), Book I | |||
=== Compatibilism === | |||
'''Compatibilism''' is the view that free or responsible agency can be compatible with causal determinism when actions issue from suitable reasons-responsive capacities. In plain language, determined choices can still be our considered choices. Agency may be defined in terms of reasons-responsive deliberation rather than uncaused choice. This reconciliation requires a substantive definition of responsibility. | |||
== 54 Time and motion ''Chronos / kinēsis'' == | |||
''al-imtidād al-zamānī (الامتداد الزماني) • Chronos / kinēsis (χρόνος / κίνησις)'' | |||
''“...a moving image of eternity...”'' | |||
<br />- Plato, Timaeus, 37d<br> | |||
<br />''“He who acquires knowledge and acts up to it and teaches it to the people is noble to the angels of heaven and earth.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Ghazālī, Iḥyāʾ ʿUlūm al-Dīn (Revival of the Religious Sciences), Book I | |||
=== Perdurantism === | |||
'''Perdurantism''' is the four-dimensional view that enduring objects persist by having distinct temporal parts. In plain language, a person extends across time rather than being only a moving present instant. Four-dimensional persistence is one account compatible with B-theory, not a compulsory consequence of it; endurantist eternalism is also possible. | |||
== 55 Pleasure and pain ''Hēdonē / lypē'' == | |||
''al-ladhdha wa-l-alam (اللذة والألم) • Hēdonē / lypē (ἡδονή / λύπη)'' | |||
''“...these inward affections of ours, like sinews or cords, drag us along...”'' | |||
<br />- Plato, Laws, 644e<br> | |||
<br />''“...every human being is by his very nature in need of many things which he cannot provide all by himself.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Fārābī, Mabādiʾ Ārāʾ Ahl al-Madīna al-Fāḍila (The Perfect State), V.15.1 | |||
=== Phenomenal valence === | |||
'''Phenomenal valence''' is the positive or negative felt character of experience, including pleasure, pain and affective tone. In plain language, experiences can feel good, bad or neither. Conscious experience includes pleasure, suffering and other positively or negatively toned states. This gives ethics a candidate subject matter but does not by itself settle what ought to be valued. | |||
== 56 The Good ''Agathon'' == | |||
''Agathon (ἀγαθόν) • al-khayr al-mawḍūʿī (الخير الموضوعي)'' | |||
< | ''“...it is beyond being, exceeding it in dignity and power.”'' | ||
<br />- Plato, Republic, 509b<br> | |||
<br />''“...every human being is by his very nature in need of many things which he cannot provide all by himself.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Fārābī, Mabādiʾ Ārāʾ Ahl al-Madīna al-Fāḍila (The Perfect State), V.15.1 | |||
''' | === Axiological realism === | ||
'''Axiological realism''' is the metaethical thesis that evaluative truths obtain independently of mere individual preference. In plain language, some things could be genuinely good or bad, not just liked or disliked. The presence of felt differences suggests evaluative questions, but objective value demands a further normative argument. Neither perdurantism nor graded consciousness logically guarantees realism about value. | |||
== 57 Soul and living being ''Psychē / zōon'' == | |||
''al-iʿtibār al-akhlāqī li-kull dhī shuʿūr (الاعتبار الأخلاقي لكل ذي شعور) • Karuṇā (करुणा) • Psychē / zōon (ψυχή / ζῷον)'' | |||
< | ''“He was good, and the good can never have any jealousy of anything.”'' | ||
<br />- Plato, Timaeus, 29e<br> | |||
<br />''“...every human being is by his very nature in need of many things which he cannot provide all by himself.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Fārābī, Mabādiʾ Ārāʾ Ahl al-Madīna al-Fāḍila (The Perfect State), V.15.1 | |||
''' | === Sentient moral considerability === | ||
'''Sentient moral considerability''' is the principle that a being's welfare interests warrant moral consideration insofar as that being can experience benefit or harm. In plain language, a creature capable of suffering matters morally. If suffering and flourishing matter for their subjects, membership in a particular species is insufficient by itself to exclude comparable experiences from concern; proportionality must still be morally defended. | |||
''' | == 58 Virtue and end ''Aretē / telos'' == | ||
''al-kamāl al-akhlāqī / al-faḍīla (الكمال الأخلاقي / الفضيلة) • Aretē / telos (ἀρετή / τέλος)'' | |||
''“...the power and capacity of learning exists in the soul already...”'' | |||
<br />- Plato, Republic, 518c<br> | |||
<br />''“...every human being is by his very nature in need of many things which he cannot provide all by himself.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Fārābī, Mabādiʾ Ārāʾ Ahl al-Madīna al-Fāḍila (The Perfect State), V.15.1 | |||
=== Perfectionist moral naturalism === | |||
'''Perfectionist moral naturalism''' is an ethical theory grounding human excellence partly in developing constitutive capacities and forms of flourishing. In plain language, a good life cultivates what makes conscious agents flourish. Taking capacities and flourishing as morally relevant supports a perfectionist interpretation of the good; whether value reduces to natural properties is a further metaethical thesis. | |||
== 59 Cause and action ''Aitia / praxis'' == | |||
''Aitia / praxis (αἰτία / πρᾶξις) • al-sababiyya al-akhlāqiyya (السببية الأخلاقية)'' | |||
''“...a cause is one thing, and the thing without which the cause could never be a cause is quite another thing.”'' | |||
<br />- Plato, Phaedo, 99b<br> | |||
<br />''“...every human being is by his very nature in need of many things which he cannot provide all by himself.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Fārābī, Mabādiʾ Ārāʾ Ahl al-Madīna al-Fāḍila (The Perfect State), V.15.1 | |||
=== Moral causality === | |||
'''Moral causality''' is the thesis that moral decisions must take account of how actions and practices causally affect lives. In plain language, consequences for beings matter in ethical judgment. Actions affect real lives through causal pathways; ethical guidance should therefore consider consequences without presuming that consequences exhaust every moral consideration. | |||
== 60 Flourishing and the common good ''Eudaimonia / to koinon agathon'' == | |||
''al-maṣlaḥa al-ʿāmma / al-khayr al-ʿāmm (المصلحة العامة / الخير العام) • Eudaimonia / to koinon agathon (εὐδαιμονία / τὸ κοινὸν ἀγαθόν) • Sarvodaya (सर्वोदय)'' | |||
''“...the law is not concerned with making any one class in the state do exceptionally well...”'' | |||
<br />- Plato, Republic, 519e<br> | |||
<br />''“...every human being is by his very nature in need of many things which he cannot provide all by himself.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Fārābī, Mabādiʾ Ārāʾ Ahl al-Madīna al-Fāḍila (The Perfect State), V.15.1 | |||
=== Universal wellbeing === | |||
'''Universal wellbeing''' is the impartial ethical aim of improving sustainable welfare across all morally considerable beings. In plain language, seek a better life for everyone affected, not just an in-group. This expressly adopts the conative goal of impartially expanding sustainable wellbeing; it is not forced merely by detecting sentience. Plato’s common good provides a civic precursor, here universalised. | |||
== 61 Human virtue ''Anthrōpinē aretē'' == | |||
''Anthrōpinē aretē (ἀνθρωπίνη ἀρετή) • kamāl al-insān (كمال الإنسان)'' | |||
''“...to become like God is to become righteous and holy and wise.”'' | |||
<br />- Plato, Theaetetus, 176b<br> | |||
<br />''“To be a truly perfect philosopher one has to possess both the theoretical sciences and the faculty for exploiting them for the benefit of all others according to their capacity.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Fārābī, Taḥṣīl al-Saʿāda (The Attainment of Happiness), §54 | |||
=== Human nature perfectionism === | |||
'''Human nature perfectionism''' is an ethical anthropology in which human flourishing consists partly in developing rational, moral and practical capacities. In plain language, becoming an excellent human being is a project of growth. Because humans exercise reason, emotion and agency to differing degrees, character and ability can be cultivated; perfectibility is an aspirational ideal, not a claim of literal infallibility. | |||
== 62 Association and friendship ''Koinōnia / philia'' == | |||
''al-insān al-ijtimāʿī / al-ukhuwwa (الإنسان الاجتماعي / الأخوة) • Koinōnia / philia (κοινωνία / φιλία)'' | |||
''“...the law is not concerned with making any one class in the state do exceptionally well...”'' | |||
<br />- Plato, Republic, 519e<br> | |||
<br />''“...every human being is by his very nature in need of many things which he cannot provide all by himself.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Fārābī, Mabādiʾ Ārāʾ Ahl al-Madīna al-Fāḍila (The Perfect State), V.15.1 | |||
=== Relational personhood === | |||
'''Relational personhood''' is the view that personhood and agency are formed partly through interpersonal recognition, learning and social participation. In plain language, people become who they are through relationships as well as individual capacities. Human development depends on language, education, care and institutions, supporting a relational dimension of agency; the leap to one global moral community also invokes impartial concern. | |||
== 63 Action and will ''Praxis / boulēsis'' == | |||
''al-fiʿl al-akhlāqī / al-ʿamal al-ṣāliḥ (الفعل الأخلاقي / العمل الصالح) • Praxis / boulēsis (πρᾶξις / βούλησις)'' | |||
''“...the life which is unexamined is not worth living.”'' | |||
<br />- Plato, Apology, 38a<br> | |||
<br />''“To be a truly perfect philosopher one has to possess both the theoretical sciences and the faculty for exploiting them for the benefit of all others according to their capacity.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Fārābī, Taḥṣīl al-Saʿāda (The Attainment of Happiness), §54 | |||
=== Ethical agency === | |||
'''Ethical agency''' is the capacity and commitment to translate evaluative judgment into intentional action accountable to reasons. In plain language, act on what you have good reason to think is right. A commitment to flourishing becomes practically serious through action, but agents need proportionality, knowledge, and respect for others rather than mere zeal. | |||
== 64 Courage and endurance ''Andreia / karteria'' == | |||
''al-īthār / al-taḍḥiya (الإيثار / التضحية) • Andreia / karteria (ἀνδρεία / καρτερία)'' | |||
''“...I shall obey the god rather than you...”'' | |||
<br />- Plato, Apology, 29d<br> | |||
<br />''“...every human being is by his very nature in need of many things which he cannot provide all by himself.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Fārābī, Mabādiʾ Ārāʾ Ahl al-Madīna al-Fāḍila (The Perfect State), V.15.1 | |||
=== Principled self-sacrifice === | |||
'''Principled self-sacrifice''' is a virtue of accepting proportionate personal costs for justified goods rather than invariably prioritising comfort. In plain language, being willing to bear hardship to protect something important. The pursuit of truth or protection of others may demand accepting proportionate personal costs; the conative virtue is courage and persistence, not an unlimited duty to suffer. | |||
== 65 Justice and community ''Dikaiosynē / koinōnia'' == | |||
''al-zakāt / al-ʿadāla al-tawzīʿiyya (الزكاة / العدالة التوزيعية) • Dikaiosynē / koinōnia (δικαιοσύνη / κοινωνία)'' | |||
''“...the law is not concerned with making any one class in the state do exceptionally well...”'' | |||
<br />- Plato, Republic, 519e<br> | |||
<br />''“...every human being is by his very nature in need of many things which he cannot provide all by himself.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Fārābī, Mabādiʾ Ārāʾ Ahl al-Madīna al-Fāḍila (The Perfect State), V.15.1 | |||
=== Redistributive obligation === | |||
'''Redistributive obligation''' is a political-ethical duty to address avoidable deprivation through appropriate sharing or distribution of resources. In plain language, help ensure people have what they reasonably need to flourish. Where preventable deprivation blocks flourishing, redistribution is one possible and often important remedy; its scale and institutions require empirical evaluation. | |||
== 66 Almsgiving and beneficence ''Eleēmosynē / euergetesia'' == | |||
''Eleēmosynē / euergetesia (ἐλεημοσύνη / εὐεργεσία) • ṣadaqa / zakāt (صدقة / زكاة)'' | |||
''“...in no case is it just to harm anyone.”'' | |||
<br />- Plato, Republic, 335e<br> | |||
<br />''“...every human being is by his very nature in need of many things which he cannot provide all by himself.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Fārābī, Mabādiʾ Ārāʾ Ahl al-Madīna al-Fāḍila (The Perfect State), V.15.1 | |||
=== Charity === | |||
'''Charity''' is voluntary or institutional provision of direct assistance to people experiencing need or deprivation. In plain language, giving effective help to someone who needs it. Immediate assistance can relieve urgent suffering, though the choice of recipients and means should remain informed by evidence. | |||
== 67 Love of humanity ''Philanthrōpia'' == | |||
''al-iḥsān / al-birr (الإحسان / البر) • Philanthrōpia (φιλανθρωπία)'' | |||
''“He was good, and the good can never have any jealousy of anything.”'' | |||
<br />- Plato, Timaeus, 29e<br> | |||
<br />''“...every human being is by his very nature in need of many things which he cannot provide all by himself.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Fārābī, Mabādiʾ Ārāʾ Ahl al-Madīna al-Fāḍila (The Perfect State), V.15.1 | |||
=== Philanthropy === | |||
'''Philanthropy''' is organised concern and resource allocation for long-term social benefit beyond immediate relief. In plain language, improving lives through sustained generosity and effective institutions. Long-run wellbeing requires not only relief but coordinated investments in institutions, knowledge and social capability. | |||
== 68 Reason, spirit and appetite ''Logistikon / thymoeides / epithymētikon'' == | |||
''al-ʿaql / al-ghaḍab / al-shahwa / al-irāda (العقل / الغضب / الشهوة / الإرادة) • Logistikon / thymoeides / epithymētikon (λογιστικόν / θυμοειδές / ἐπιθυμητικόν)'' | |||
''“...learn with one part of ourselves, feel anger with another, and with yet a third desire...”'' | |||
<br />- Plato, Republic, 436a–b<br> | |||
<br />''“The heart is like a bright mirror.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Ghazālī, Kīmiyā-yi Saʿādat (The Alchemy of Happiness), on the heart | |||
=== Cognitive–affective–conative differentiation === | |||
'''Cognitive–affective–conative differentiation''' is the applied psychological differentiation of information processing, emotional evaluation and motivation. In plain language, learning to identify what one thinks, feels and wants. The earlier triad described distinguishable faculties; this later applied stage identifies which of them can be cultivated and governed in practice. | |||
== 69 Reason and intellect ''Logistikon / nous'' == | |||
''al-quwwa al-ʿāqila (القوة العاقلة) • Logistikon / nous (λογιστικόν / νοῦς)'' | |||
''“...being well advised is, in itself, knowledge of some sort...”'' | |||
<br />- Plato, Republic, 428b<br> | |||
<br />''“To be a truly perfect philosopher one has to possess both the theoretical sciences and the faculty for exploiting them for the benefit of all others according to their capacity.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Fārābī, Taḥṣīl al-Saʿāda (The Attainment of Happiness), §54 | |||
=== Intellective capacity === | |||
'''Intellective capacity''' is the capacity to weigh reasons, make distinctions and integrate thought with considered judgment. In plain language, using the intellect to understand and decide. Here epistemic capacity becomes a practical faculty able to evaluate what ought to be done, while recognising its vulnerability to ignorance and bias. | |||
== 70 Rule of reason ''To logistikon archein'' == | |||
''ḥākimiyyat al-ʿaql (حاكمية العقل) • To logistikon archein (τὸ λογιστικὸν ἄρχειν)'' | |||
''“...these inward affections of ours, like sinews or cords, drag us along...”'' | |||
<br />- Plato, Laws, 644e<br> | |||
<br />''“The heart is like a bright mirror.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Ghazālī, Kīmiyā-yi Saʿādat (The Alchemy of Happiness), on the heart | |||
=== Personal Sovereignty of Intellect === | |||
'''Personal Sovereignty of Intellect''' is a norm of reflective governance of individual desire and action by well-informed, corrigible reason. In plain language, let informed judgment guide impulses and habits. If ethically responsible action requires good judgement, reflective intellect should govern competing impulses while remaining open to emotion as evidence and to corrective feedback. | |||
== 71 Obedience and following God ''Peithesthai / akolouthein theōi'' == | |||
''al-inqiyād li-l-ḥaqq / al-islām (الانقياد للحق / الإسلام) • Peithesthai / akolouthein theōi (πείθεσθαι / ἀκολουθεῖν θεῷ)'' | |||
''“...I shall obey the god rather than you...”'' | |||
<br />- Plato, Apology, 29d<br> | |||
<br />''“The heart is like a bright mirror.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Ghazālī, Kīmiyā-yi Saʿādat (The Alchemy of Happiness), on the heart | |||
=== Islam as noetic alignment with ultimate reality === | |||
'''Islam as noetic alignment with ultimate reality''' is a Hikmati interpretation of submission as willing intellectual and ethical alignment with what is ultimately true and good. In plain language, live in accordance with the best-supported understanding of reality. When the rational agent regards truth and the Good as normatively authoritative, consistently living by that recognition requires willing alignment of judgement, desire and conduct. Hikmah Islam calls this an evolving philosophical interpretation of islām (submission); it does not claim that Plato used the Arabic word, or that classical Islamic definitions are exhausted by it. | |||
== 72 Temperance and harmony ''Sōphrosynē / symphōnia'' == | |||
''ḥukm al-nafs bi-l-ʿaql (حكم النفس بالعقل) • Sōphrosynē / symphōnia (σωφροσύνη / συμφωνία)'' | |||
''“...these inward affections of ours, like sinews or cords, drag us along...”'' | |||
<br />- Plato, Laws, 644e<br> | |||
<br />''“The heart is like a bright mirror.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Ghazālī, Kīmiyā-yi Saʿādat (The Alchemy of Happiness), on the heart | |||
=== Rational self-governance === | |||
'''Rational self-governance''' is a virtue of internal order in which rational deliberation coordinates desire, feeling and conduct. In plain language, making the different parts of oneself work together thoughtfully. A self is well ordered where deliberative understanding, feeling and desire cooperate rather than allowing one impulse to rule without scrutiny. | |||
== 73 Self-control ''Enkrateia'' == | |||
''ḍabṭ al-irāda / mujāhadat al-nafs (ضبط الإرادة / مجاهدة النفس) • Enkrateia (ἐγκράτεια)'' | |||
''“...these inward affections of ours, like sinews or cords, drag us along...”'' | |||
<br />- Plato, Laws, 644e<br> | |||
<br />''“Extra-special fasting means fasting of the heart from unworthy concerns and worldly thoughts.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Ghazālī, Iḥyāʾ ʿUlūm al-Dīn (Revival of the Religious Sciences), Book VI (On the Mysteries of Fasting) | |||
=== Volitional self-regulation === | |||
'''Volitional self-regulation''' is the executive capacity to regulate attention, impulse and action according to reflective commitments. In plain language, following through on considered decisions even when tempted otherwise. Judgement that never affects intention cannot govern conduct; self-regulation aligns habit, attention and action with reflective commitments. | |||
== 74 Temperance ''Sōphrosynē'' == | |||
''al-ʿiffa / al-iʿtidāl (العفة / الاعتدال) • Sōphrosynē (σωφροσύνη)'' | |||
''“...these inward affections of ours, like sinews or cords, drag us along...”'' | |||
<br />- Plato, Laws, 644e<br> | |||
<br />''“Extra-special fasting means fasting of the heart from unworthy concerns and worldly thoughts.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Ghazālī, Iḥyāʾ ʿUlūm al-Dīn (Revival of the Religious Sciences), Book VI (On the Mysteries of Fasting) | |||
=== Temperance === | |||
'''Temperance''' is the virtue of moderating appetite and pleasure in accordance with sound practical judgment. In plain language, enjoying things without being ruled by them. Temperance moderates rather than abolishes appetite and protects the ability to act in accordance with sound judgment. | |||
== 75 Education ''Paideia'' == | |||
''Paideia (παιδεία) • tazkiyat al-nafs / tarbiyat al-nafs (تزكية النفس / تربية النفس)'' | |||
''“...the power and capacity of learning exists in the soul already...”'' | |||
<br />- Plato, Republic, 518c<br> | |||
<br />''“The heart is like a bright mirror.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Ghazālī, Kīmiyā-yi Saʿādat (The Alchemy of Happiness), on the heart | |||
=== Self-cultivation as conative commitment === | |||
'''Self-cultivation as conative commitment''' is an enduring motivational commitment to the intellectual, ethical and practical improvement of oneself. In plain language, genuinely wanting to become wiser and better. The will to develop is a chosen motivational primitive; it makes the earlier epistemic and moral principles effective as a lived project. | |||
== 76 Education and turning ''Paideia / periagōgē'' == | |||
''Paideia / periagōgē (παιδεία / περιαγωγή) • riyāḍat al-nafs / tazkiya (رياضة النفس / تزكية)'' | |||
''“...the whole soul be turned from the world of becoming into that of being...”'' | |||
<br />- Plato, Republic, 518c<br> | |||
<br />''“The heart is like a bright mirror.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Ghazālī, Kīmiyā-yi Saʿādat (The Alchemy of Happiness), on the heart | |||
=== Self-cultivation as disciplined practice === | |||
'''Self-cultivation as disciplined practice''' is the sustained practical formation of capacities and character through learning, reflection and disciplined exercise. In plain language, making self-improvement a habit. Because capacities are plastic and habits trainable, education and practice should progressively reorient the whole person toward what she has good reason to value. | |||
== 77 Care and turning ''Epimeleia / periagōgē'' == | |||
''Epimeleia / periagōgē (ἐπιμέλεια / περιαγωγή) • murāqaba / dhikr / taqwā (مراقبة / ذكر / تقوى) • Sati (सति)'' | |||
''“...the life which is unexamined is not worth living.”'' | |||
<br />- Plato, Apology, 38a<br> | |||
<br />''“Extra-special fasting means fasting of the heart from unworthy concerns and worldly thoughts.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Ghazālī, Iḥyāʾ ʿUlūm al-Dīn (Revival of the Religious Sciences), Book VI (On the Mysteries of Fasting) | |||
=== Mindfulness === | |||
'''Mindfulness''' is intentional, non-reactive attention to present mental events, exercised with awareness and critical reflection. In plain language, noticing thoughts and feelings as they arise. Attention training creates awareness of mental events before they become unexamined habits. The fully developed term prosochē is especially prominent in later Stoicism rather than Plato. | |||
== 78 Recollection ''Anamnēsis'' == | |||
''Anamnēsis (ἀνάμνησις) • dhikr / tadhakkur (ذكر / تذكّر) • Smṛti (स्मृति)'' | |||
''“...the power and capacity of learning exists in the soul already...”'' | |||
<br />- Plato, Republic, 518c<br> | |||
<br />''“Extra-special fasting means fasting of the heart from unworthy concerns and worldly thoughts.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Ghazālī, Iḥyāʾ ʿUlūm al-Dīn (Revival of the Religious Sciences), Book VI (On the Mysteries of Fasting) | |||
=== Recollective practice === | |||
'''Recollective practice''' is a repeated practice of recalling governing truths, values or intentions to maintain ethical orientation. In plain language, deliberately remembering what matters. Repeated remembrance can restore attention to core truths and commitments; Plato’s recollection theory is a historical analogue rather than an identical spiritual practice. | |||
== 79 Prayer and sacrifice ''Euchē / thysia'' == | |||
''Euchē / thysia (εὐχή / θυσία) • ṣalāh / duʿāʾ (صلاة / دعاء)'' | |||
''“...I shall obey the god rather than you...”'' | |||
<br />- Plato, Apology, 29d<br> | |||
<br />''“The heart is like a bright mirror.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Ghazālī, Kīmiyā-yi Saʿādat (The Alchemy of Happiness), on the heart | |||
=== Ritualised daily prayer === | |||
'''Ritualised daily prayer''' is a structured repeated practice of religious address, contemplation or devotion performed at prescribed or chosen times. In plain language, giving prayer a regular place in daily life. Regular ritual can stabilise remembrance and community; the specifically Islamic form and its obligatoriness arise from a later religious history, not from deduction alone. | |||
== 80 Purification and training ''Katharsis / askēsis'' == | |||
''Katharsis / askēsis (κάθαρσις / ἄσκησις) • zuhd / riyāḍa (زهد / رياضة)'' | |||
''“...must escape from earth to the dwelling of the gods as quickly as we can...”'' | |||
<br />- Plato, Theaetetus, 176b<br> | |||
<br />''“It should be known that there are three grades of fasting: ordinary, special and extra-special.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Ghazālī, Iḥyāʾ ʿUlūm al-Dīn (Revival of the Religious Sciences), Book VI (On the Mysteries of Fasting) | |||
=== Ascetic discipline === | |||
'''Ascetic discipline''' is voluntary and proportionate restriction of appetite or comfort for ethical or contemplative cultivation. In plain language, sometimes doing without comforts to practise self-command. Deliberate and proportionate restraint can test whether desire or reflection is governing conduct; practices require health-sensitive limits. | |||
== 81 Self-control and abstention ''Enkrateia / apochē'' == | |||
''Enkrateia / apochē (ἐγκράτεια / ἀποχή) • ṣawm / ṣiyām (صوم / صيام)'' | |||
''“...these inward affections of ours, like sinews or cords, drag us along...”'' | |||
<br />- Plato, Laws, 644e<br> | |||
<br />''“It should be known that there are three grades of fasting: ordinary, special and extra-special.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Ghazālī, Iḥyāʾ ʿUlūm al-Dīn (Revival of the Religious Sciences), Book VI (On the Mysteries of Fasting) | |||
=== Fasting === | |||
'''Fasting''' is deliberate time-limited abstinence from food, drink or other consumption for religious or ethical purposes. In plain language, fasting to cultivate attentiveness and restraint when safe. Time-limited abstention can train self-command where medically and socially appropriate; no specific regimen follows purely from the metaphysical premises. | |||
== 82 Intellect and health ''Nous / hugieia'' == | |||
''ḥifẓ al-ʿaql (حفظ العقل) • Nous / hugieia (νοῦς / ὑγίεια)'' | |||
''“...learn with one part of ourselves, feel anger with another, and with yet a third desire...”'' | |||
<br />- Plato, Republic, 436a–b<br> | |||
<br />''“The heart is like a bright mirror.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Ghazālī, Kīmiyā-yi Saʿādat (The Alchemy of Happiness), on the heart | |||
=== Preservation of cognitive health === | |||
'''Preservation of cognitive health''' is protection of the biological, educational and social conditions enabling attention, reasoning and sound judgment. In plain language, protecting sleep, brain health and the ability to think clearly. Sleep, health, education and environmental conditions affect good judgment; safeguarding cognition is therefore an enabling duty under the sovereignty of intellect. | |||
== 83 Desire and intemperance ''Epithymia / akolasia'' == | |||
''Epithymia / akolasia (ἐπιθυμία / ἀκολασία) • qābiliyyat al-idmān / al-iʿtimād (قابلية الإدمان / الاعتماد)'' | |||
''“...these inward affections of ours, like sinews or cords, drag us along...”'' | |||
<br />- Plato, Laws, 644e<br> | |||
<br />''“The heart is like a bright mirror.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Ghazālī, Kīmiyā-yi Saʿādat (The Alchemy of Happiness), on the heart | |||
=== Addiction liability === | |||
'''Addiction liability''' is the propensity of repeated rewarding exposures to develop into compulsive patterns that disrupt self-regulation. In plain language, some activities or substances can become hard to stop despite harm. Habituation and dependency can compromise deliberative agency, calling for prevention, treatment, and proportionate safeguards informed by modern evidence. | |||
== 84 Temperance ''Sōphrosynē'' == | |||
''al-imtināʿ ʿan al-khamr (الامتناع عن الخمر) • Sōphrosynē (σωφροσύνη)'' | |||
''“...these inward affections of ours, like sinews or cords, drag us along...”'' | |||
<br />- Plato, Laws, 644e<br> | |||
<br />''“The heart is like a bright mirror.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Ghazālī, Kīmiyā-yi Saʿādat (The Alchemy of Happiness), on the heart | |||
=== Teetotalism === | |||
'''Teetotalism''' is a personal or collective commitment to abstain from alcoholic beverages as a preventive discipline. In plain language, choosing not to drink alcohol. Complete abstention can be chosen as a stable precaution for self-command, but neither Plato nor modern evidence makes it a categorical logical consequence for every person. | |||
== 85 Contemplation and purification ''Theōria / katharsis'' == | |||
''Fanāʾ (فناء) • ʿirfān / ʿibāda (عرفان / عبادة) • Theōria / katharsis (θεωρία / κάθαρσις)'' | |||
''“...must escape from earth to the dwelling of the gods as quickly as we can...”'' | |||
<br />- Plato, Theaetetus, 176b<br> | |||
<br />''“The heart is like a bright mirror.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Ghazālī, Kīmiyā-yi Saʿādat (The Alchemy of Happiness), on the heart | |||
=== Mysticism === | |||
'''Mysticism''' is a family of practices seeking experiential transformation or direct apprehension of ultimate reality. In plain language, cultivating inner awareness rather than merely arguing about ideas. Intellectual understanding can be integrated with disciplined first-person transformation, provided experiences remain answerable to reasons and reality. | |||
== 86 Intellection and truth ''Noēsis / alētheia'' == | |||
''kashf ṣādiq / waḥy / ilhām (كشف صادق / وحي / إلهام) • Noēsis / alētheia (νόησις / ἀλήθεια)'' | |||
''“...true opinion along with an account is knowledge...”'' | |||
<br />- Plato, Theaetetus, 201d<br> | |||
<br />''“The aim of the philosopher is, as regards his knowledge, to attain the truth.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Kindī, Fī al-Falsafa al-Ūlā (On First Philosophy), I | |||
=== Veridical cognition and noetic disclosure === | |||
'''Veridical cognition and noetic disclosure''' is the acquisition of true content through cognition or claimed disclosure, distinguished from an experience's mere vividness. In plain language, a powerful insight counts as knowledge only when it is actually right. Disclosure names an event of apprehension; only when its content survives appropriate testing does it count as veridical. This separates experience, reported revelation and justified knowledge. | |||
== 87 Wisdom ''Sophia'' == | |||
''ḥikmah (حكمة) • Prajñā (प्रज्ञा) • Sophia (σοφία)'' | |||
''“...being well advised is, in itself, knowledge of some sort...”'' | |||
<br />- Plato, Republic, 428b<br> | |||
<br />''“The aim of the philosopher is, as regards his knowledge, to attain the truth.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Kindī, Fī al-Falsafa al-Ūlā (On First Philosophy), I | |||
=== Wisdom === | |||
'''Wisdom''' is an integrated excellence of judgment combining knowledge, ethical insight and effective practical orientation. In plain language, knowing what matters and living accordingly. Sophia names the integration of understanding with a well-ordered life; Hikmah Islam develops it through the Arabic wisdom tradition without equating all historically different uses of ḥikmah. | |||
== 88 Becoming like God ''Homoiōsis theōi'' == | |||
''Homoiōsis theōi (ὁμοίωσις θεῷ) • taʾalluh / takhalluq bi-akhlāq Allāh (تألّه / تخلّق بأخلاق الله) • Theōsis (θέωσις)'' | |||
''“...to become like God is to become righteous and holy and wise.”'' | |||
<br />- Plato, Theaetetus, 176b<br> | |||
<br />''“The aim of the philosopher is, as regards his knowledge, to attain the truth.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Kindī, Fī al-Falsafa al-Ūlā (On First Philosophy), I | |||
=== Divine-likeness and perfected humanity === | |||
'''Divine-likeness and perfected humanity''' is an ideal of cultivating human justice, wisdom and moral excellence by analogy with divine perfection. In plain language, become as good and wise as humanly possible, not literally become God. The ethical ideal is progressively to resemble the highest intelligible good in justice, mercy and understanding, not literally to become the simple ultimate ground. | |||
== 89 Music and poetry ''Mousikē / poiēsis'' == | |||
''Mousikē / poiēsis (μουσική / ποίησις) • Saṅgīta (संगीत) • shiʿr / fann / samāʿ (شعر / فن / سماع)'' | |||
''“...rhythm and harmony find their way into the inward places of the soul.”'' | |||
<br />- Plato, Republic, 401d<br> | |||
<br />''“He who acquires knowledge and acts up to it and teaches it to the people is noble to the angels of heaven and earth.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Ghazālī, Iḥyāʾ ʿUlūm al-Dīn (Revival of the Religious Sciences), Book I | |||
=== Poetry, music and the arts === | |||
'''Poetry, music and the arts''' is creative practices shaping imagination, feeling, understanding and communal memory through artistic forms. In plain language, art and music can educate emotions and perception. Art and poetry can cultivate perception, emotion and imagination, provided the choice of forms remains open to moral and aesthetic criticism. Plato defends formative music yet restricts some poetic imitation: later Hikmati development should acknowledge this disagreement. | |||
== 90 Community and city ''Koinōnia / polis'' == | |||
''Koinōnia / polis (κοινωνία / πόλις) • Saṅgha (संघ) • umma / madīna / tamaddun (أمة / مدينة / تمدّن)'' | |||
''“...the law is not concerned with making any one class in the state do exceptionally well...”'' | |||
<br />- Plato, Republic, 519e<br> | |||
<br />''“To be a truly perfect philosopher one has to possess both the theoretical sciences and the faculty for exploiting them for the benefit of all others according to their capacity.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Fārābī, Taḥṣīl al-Saʿāda (The Attainment of Happiness), §54 | |||
=== Community and civilisation === | |||
'''Community and civilisation''' is a socially organised setting for shared life, learning, institutions and transmission of norms and knowledge. In plain language, people build lasting communities and civilisations together. Social cooperation, intergenerational learning and shared institutions are conditions of human flourishing; the polis is a Platonic ancestor of community as a formative structure. | |||
== 91 Capacity and nature ''Dynamis / physis'' == | |||
''Dynamis / physis (δύναμις / φύσις) • tafāwut al-ʿuqūl / tashkīk al-ʿaql (تفاوت العقول / تشكيك العقل)'' | |||
''“...learn with one part of ourselves, feel anger with another, and with yet a third desire...”'' | |||
<br />- Plato, Republic, 436a–b<br> | |||
<br />''“...every human being is by his very nature in need of many things which he cannot provide all by himself.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Fārābī, Mabādiʾ Ārāʾ Ahl al-Madīna al-Fāḍila (The Perfect State), V.15.1 | |||
=== Cognitive differentiation === | |||
'''Cognitive differentiation''' is variation among persons in cognitive ability, cultivated skill, expertise and reflective judgment. In plain language, people differ in what they know and how well they reason. Because abilities differ and can develop, roles and education should be responsive to demonstrated competence without equating cognitive ability with moral worth or political entitlement. | |||
== 92 Spirit, desire and wish ''Thymos / epithymia / boulēsis'' == | |||
''tafāwut al-irādāt / tashkīk al-irāda (تفاوت الإرادات / تشكيك الإرادة) • Thymos / epithymia / boulēsis (θυμός / ἐπιθυμία / βούλησις)'' | |||
''“...these inward affections of ours, like sinews or cords, drag us along...”'' | |||
<br />- Plato, Laws, 644e<br> | |||
<br />''“...every human being is by his very nature in need of many things which he cannot provide all by himself.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Fārābī, Mabādiʾ Ārāʾ Ahl al-Madīna al-Fāḍila (The Perfect State), V.15.1 | |||
=== Conative differentiation === | |||
'''Conative differentiation''' is variation among persons in motivation, perseverance, self-command and the practical pursuit of ends. In plain language, knowing what to do and being able to do it are different matters. Variation in motivation and self-command matters separately from knowledge, so institutions must cultivate both rather than assuming instruction alone changes behaviour. | |||
== 93 Association and moderation ''Koinōnia / sōphrosynē'' == | |||
''ḥākimiyyat al-ʿaql al-mujtamaʿiyya (حاكمية العقل المجتمعية) • Koinōnia / sōphrosynē (κοινωνία / σωφροσύνη)'' | |||
''“...the law is not concerned with making any one class in the state do exceptionally well...”'' | |||
<br />- Plato, Republic, 519e<br> | |||
<br />''“To be a truly perfect philosopher one has to possess both the theoretical sciences and the faculty for exploiting them for the benefit of all others according to their capacity.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Fārābī, Taḥṣīl al-Saʿāda (The Attainment of Happiness), §54 | |||
=== Communal Sovereignty of Intellect === | |||
'''Communal Sovereignty of Intellect''' is the norm that collective deliberation and shared practices should be guided by evidence, reasons and corrigible judgment. In plain language, groups should think together rather than follow panic, prejudice or impulse. If persons ought to reason well and social structures shape their options, communal norms should enable informed cooperative agency rather than amplify prejudice and impulse. | |||
== 94 Education and flourishing ''Paideia / eudaimonia'' == | |||
''al-tarbiyya al-ʿālamiyya / al-ṣalāḥ al-ʿāmm (التربية العالمية / الصلاح العام) • Paideia / eudaimonia (παιδεία / εὐδαιμονία)'' | |||
''“...the power and capacity of learning exists in the soul already...”'' | |||
<br />- Plato, Republic, 518c<br> | |||
<br />''“To be a truly perfect philosopher one has to possess both the theoretical sciences and the faculty for exploiting them for the benefit of all others according to their capacity.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Fārābī, Taḥṣīl al-Saʿāda (The Attainment of Happiness), §54 | |||
=== Global cultivation === | |||
'''Global cultivation''' is the universal expansion of opportunities for intellectual, ethical and practical development. In plain language, make education and conditions for growth available across the world. When wellbeing has universal scope, education, public health, arts and just institutions become global rather than exclusively local concerns. | |||
== 95 Education and character ''Paideia / ethos'' == | |||
''Paideia / ethos (παιδεία / ἦθος) • tarbiyat al-mujtamaʿ / tahdhīb al-akhlāq (تربية المجتمع / تهذيب الأخلاق)'' | |||
''“...the power and capacity of learning exists in the soul already...”'' | |||
<br />- Plato, Republic, 518c<br> | |||
<br />''“To be a truly perfect philosopher one has to possess both the theoretical sciences and the faculty for exploiting them for the benefit of all others according to their capacity.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Fārābī, Taḥṣīl al-Saʿāda (The Attainment of Happiness), §54 | |||
=== Social cultivation === | |||
'''Social cultivation''' is the deliberate cultivation of civic habits, character and capacities through education and social institutions. In plain language, shape social environments that help people act well. The environment creates incentives and norms affecting character; cultural and educational reform therefore have ethical significance, subject to rights and evidence. | |||
''' | == 96 Law and persuasion ''Nomos / peithō'' == | ||
''al-tashjīʿ wa-l-tanzīm (التشجيع والتنظيم) • Nomos / peithō (νόμος / πειθώ)'' | |||
'' | ''“...lawmaking belongs to the science of kingship...”'' | ||
<br />- Plato, Statesman, 294a<br> | |||
<br />''“...the voluntary intelligibles are embodied in laws.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Fārābī, Taḥṣīl al-Saʿāda (The Attainment of Happiness), §56 | |||
=== Need to encourage and regulate behaviour === | |||
'''Need to encourage and regulate behaviour''' is the use of justified incentives, norms and rules to coordinate behaviour toward social goods. In plain language, encourage beneficial conduct and restrain harmful conduct fairly. Information alone often fails to produce action; incentives, norms and rules may help when proportionate, non-discriminatory and correctable. The need for a response does not justify arbitrary coercion. | |||
== 97 Persuasion and rhetoric ''Peithō / rhētorikē'' == | |||
== | ''Peithō / rhētorikē (πειθώ / ῥητορική) • risāla / daʿwa (رسالة / دعوة)'' | ||
''' | ''“...rhetoric as a whole [is] a skill which leads the soul through words...”'' | ||
<br />- Plato, Phaedrus, 261a<br> | |||
<br />''“Religion sets forth their images by means of similitudes of them taken from corporeal principles.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Fārābī, Taḥṣīl al-Saʿāda (The Attainment of Happiness), §55 | |||
=== Norm entrepreneurship === | |||
'''Norm entrepreneurship''' is the deliberate development and communication of proposals for new shared standards of conduct. In plain language, persuade people to adopt better social norms. Advocacy, teaching and exemplarity can change what communities regard as admirable, acceptable and obligatory. Influence should remain accountable to truth and welfare. | |||
''' | == 98 Collection and division ''Synagōgē / diairesis'' == | ||
''al-jamʿ wa-l-taqsīm / taʾwīl (الجمع والتقسيم / تأويل) • Synagōgē / diairesis (συναγωγή / διαίρεσις)'' | |||
''' | ''“...a lover of these processes of division and bringing together, as aids to speech and thought...”'' | ||
<br />- Plato, Phaedrus, 266b<br> | |||
<br />''“Religion sets forth their images by means of similitudes of them taken from corporeal principles.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Fārābī, Taḥṣīl al-Saʿāda (The Attainment of Happiness), §55 | |||
=== Comparative abstraction === | |||
'''Comparative abstraction''' is a comparative method that identifies shared features while distinguishing irreducible differences among traditions or concepts. In plain language, compare ideas carefully without treating similar words as identical. Collection identifies meaningful similarities; division tests differences and prevents a loose comparison from becoming a claim of strict identity. | |||
== 99 Guidance of souls ''Psychagōgia'' == | |||
=== | ''mudārāt al-ʿuqūl / tawriya (مداراة العقول / تورية) • Psychagōgia (ψυχαγωγία)'' | ||
''' | ''“...rhetoric as a whole [is] a skill which leads the soul through words...”'' | ||
<br />- Plato, Phaedrus, 261a<br> | |||
<br />''“Religion sets forth their images by means of similitudes of them taken from corporeal principles.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Fārābī, Taḥṣīl al-Saʿāda (The Attainment of Happiness), §55 | |||
''' | === Intellectual accommodation === | ||
'''Intellectual accommodation''' is adapting the presentation of a true or well-supported insight to the audience's understanding without falsifying it. In plain language, explain hard ideas in ways people can grasp. A true explanation should use concepts accessible to its audience while avoiding distortion of critical facts or manipulative concealment. | |||
== 100 Opportune moment and guidance of souls ''Kairos / psychagōgia'' == | |||
''Kairos / psychagōgia (καιρός / ψυχαγωγία) • tadarruj al-bayān / taqiyya (تدرّج البيان / تقية)'' | |||
''“...rhetoric as a whole [is] a skill which leads the soul through words...”'' | |||
<br />- Plato, Phaedrus, 261a<br> | |||
<br />''“Religion sets forth their images by means of similitudes of them taken from corporeal principles.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Fārābī, Taḥṣīl al-Saʿāda (The Attainment of Happiness), §55 | |||
''' | === Staged disclosure === | ||
'''Staged disclosure''' is sequencing difficult disclosures or instruction according to context and readiness, subject to duties of honesty. In plain language, teach things in a sensible order rather than overwhelming or misleading people. Sequencing instruction according to readiness can improve comprehension; concealment of facts essential to informed decisions would need separate ethical justification. | |||
''' | == 101 Turning and opinion ''Periagōgē / doxa'' == | ||
''iʿādat al-taʾṭīr al-idrākī (إعادة التأطير الإدراكي) • Periagōgē / doxa (περιαγωγή / δόξα)'' | |||
''“...the whole soul be turned from the world of becoming into that of being...”'' | |||
<br />- Plato, Republic, 518c<br> | |||
<br />''“Religion sets forth their images by means of similitudes of them taken from corporeal principles.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Fārābī, Taḥṣīl al-Saʿāda (The Attainment of Happiness), §55 | |||
=== Cognitive reframing === | |||
== | '''Cognitive reframing''' is a deliberate change in the conceptual framing through which a situation is interpreted. In plain language, help someone see the same issue from a more useful angle. Explanatory framing changes how information is understood; legitimate reframing clarifies rather than fabricates evidence. | ||
''' | == 102 Form and collection ''Eidos / synagōgē'' == | ||
''Eidos / synagōgē (εἶδος / συναγωγή) • intizāʿ al-māhiyya / taʾwīl (انتزاع الماهية / تأويل)'' | |||
< | ''“...we must always assume that there is in every case one idea of everything and must look for it...”'' | ||
<br />- Plato, Philebus, 16d<br> | |||
<br />''“Religion sets forth their images by means of similitudes of them taken from corporeal principles.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Fārābī, Taḥṣīl al-Saʿāda (The Attainment of Happiness), §55 | |||
''' | === Essentialisation === | ||
'''Essentialisation''' is the interpretive process of distinguishing a concept's defining characteristics from incidental associations. In plain language, identify what makes a thing the kind of thing it is. The method proposes shared functional or conceptual cores across vocabularies, but each historical tradition must retain its own documented meanings. | |||
''' | == 103 Myth and reason ''Mythos / logos'' == | ||
''al-sardiyya al-kubrā / qiṣaṣ (السردية الكبرى / قصص) • Mythos / logos (μῦθος / λόγος)'' | |||
''“...we might invent one of those useful falsehoods...”'' | |||
<br />- Plato, Republic, 414b–c<br> | |||
<br />''“Religion sets forth their images by means of similitudes of them taken from corporeal principles.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Fārābī, Taḥṣīl al-Saʿāda (The Attainment of Happiness), §55 | |||
=== Metanarratives === | |||
=== | '''Metanarratives''' is overarching narratives that integrate events and values into a larger account of social or cosmic meaning. In plain language, the big stories through which groups understand themselves. Large narratives can coordinate identity and long-range action, but any factual historical claims within them must remain independently testable. | ||
''' | == 104 Image and model ''Eikōn / paradeigma'' == | ||
''Eikōn / paradeigma (εἰκών / παράδειγμα) • ramz / mithāl (رمز / مثال)'' | |||
'' | ''“...an elixir of memory and wisdom that I have discovered.”'' | ||
<br />- Plato, Phaedrus, 274e<br> | |||
<br />''“Religion sets forth their images by means of similitudes of them taken from corporeal principles.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Fārābī, Taḥṣīl al-Saʿāda (The Attainment of Happiness), §55 | |||
''' | === Motifs and imagery === | ||
'''Motifs and imagery''' is recurring symbolic representations or patterns that convey abstract meanings through images. In plain language, using memorable images to communicate ideas. Symbols aid retention and imagination but should not be mistaken for the literal structures they represent. | |||
''' | == 105 Myth and imitation ''Mythos / mimēsis'' == | ||
''Mythos / mimēsis (μῦθος / μίμησις) • taʾwīl al-asāṭīr / iʿādat al-tawẓīf (تأويل الأساطير / إعادة التوظيف)'' | |||
''“...we might invent one of those useful falsehoods...”'' | |||
<br />- Plato, Republic, 414b–c<br> | |||
<br />''“Religion sets forth their images by means of similitudes of them taken from corporeal principles.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Fārābī, Taḥṣīl al-Saʿāda (The Attainment of Happiness), §55 | |||
=== Mythic reappropriation === | |||
== | '''Mythic reappropriation''' is the reinterpretation or reuse of inherited mythic material to convey new philosophical or ethical meanings. In plain language, give old stories thoughtful new interpretations. Inherited stories may be reinterpreted as moral allegory, provided the distinction between historical evidence and new symbolism stays explicit. | ||
''' | == 106 Myth and poetry ''Mythos / poiēsis'' == | ||
''Mythos / poiēsis (μῦθος / ποίησις) • ṣiyāghat al-usṭūra / al-qaṣaṣ al-ramzī (صياغة الأسطورة / القصص الرمزي)'' | |||
''' | ''“...all good poets ... make their beautiful poems not by art, but because they are inspired and possessed.”'' | ||
<br />- Plato, Ion, 533e<br> | |||
<br />''“Religion sets forth their images by means of similitudes of them taken from corporeal principles.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Fārābī, Taḥṣīl al-Saʿāda (The Attainment of Happiness), §55 | |||
''' | === Mythopoeia === | ||
'''Mythopoeia''' is the creative construction of myth-like symbolic narratives expressing collective ideals or metaphysical themes. In plain language, making new stories that communicate a worldview. New narratives can express ideals through literary forms without presenting invented events as verified history. | |||
''' | == 107 Sacred and holy ''Hieros / hosios'' == | ||
''Hieros / hosios (ἱερός / ὅσιος) • taqdīs / taʿẓīm (تقديس / تعظيم)'' | |||
''“...must escape from earth to the dwelling of the gods as quickly as we can...”'' | |||
<br />- Plato, Theaetetus, 176b<br> | |||
<br />''“Finally, philosophy is prior to religion in time.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Fārābī, Taḥṣīl al-Saʿāda (The Attainment of Happiness), §55 | |||
=== Sacralisation === | |||
== | '''Sacralisation''' is the attribution of special reverence, sanctity or protected significance to persons, practices or symbols. In plain language, treating something as sacred and worthy of particular respect. Sacred status can deepen commitment but must not exempt any person, object or institution from moral evaluation and factual criticism. | ||
''' | == 108 Contemplation ''Theōria'' == | ||
''ḥajj / ziyāra (حج / زيارة) • Theōria (θεωρία) • Yātrā (यात्रा)'' | |||
''' | ''“...must escape from earth to the dwelling of the gods as quickly as we can...”'' | ||
<br />- Plato, Theaetetus, 176b<br> | |||
<br />''“Finally, philosophy is prior to religion in time.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Fārābī, Taḥṣīl al-Saʿāda (The Attainment of Happiness), §55 | |||
''' | === Pilgrimage === | ||
'''Pilgrimage''' is travel undertaken to a place for religious, contemplative or morally formative significance. In plain language, journeying to a meaningful place as a spiritual practice. Sacred travel can focus commitment, learning and communal memory; neither one site nor one itinerary follows from the philosophical premise alone. | |||
''' | == 109 Piety and constitution ''Eusebeia / politeia'' == | ||
''Dharma (धर्म) • dīn / islām (دين / إسلام) • Eusebeia / politeia (εὐσέβεια / πολιτεία)'' | |||
'' | ''“...I shall obey the god rather than you...”'' | ||
<br />- Plato, Apology, 29d<br> | |||
<br />''“Religion is opinions and actions, determined and restricted with stipulations and prescribed for a community by their first ruler”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Fārābī, Kitāb al-Milla (Book of Religion), §1 | |||
=== Religion as a wisdom-bearing institution === | |||
'''Religion as a wisdom-bearing institution''' is an organised tradition that combines shared doctrine, practice, symbolism and social institutions. In plain language, religion transmits a way of understanding and living. Religion can integrate meanings, institutions, practices and spiritual formation, but no single historic religion follows purely from the abstract possibility of such integration. | |||
== 110 Divine madness and truth ''Theia mania / alētheia'' == | |||
== | ''Theia mania / alētheia (θεία μανία / ἀλήθεια) • waḥy / tajallī / kashf (وحي / تجلّي / كشف)'' | ||
''' | ''“...all good poets ... make their beautiful poems not by art, but because they are inspired and possessed.”'' | ||
<br />- Plato, Ion, 533e<br> | |||
<br />''“Religion sets forth their images by means of similitudes of them taken from corporeal principles.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Fārābī, Taḥṣīl al-Saʿāda (The Attainment of Happiness), §55 | |||
''' | === Revelation as non-static disclosure and movement === | ||
'''Revelation as non-static disclosure and movement''' is a proposed understanding of revelation as disclosure or insight mediated by historical consciousness and requiring interpretation. In plain language, claims of revelation must still be understood and evaluated rather than frozen as unchangeable words. Revelation is interpreted as historically mediated disclosure and ethical transformation, not possession of a permanently exhaustive textual inventory. Whether a particular revelation occurred requires independent historical inquiry. | |||
''' | == 111 Divination and wisdom ''Mantikē / sophia'' == | ||
''Mantikē / sophia (μαντική / σοφία) • nubuwwa / nabī (نبوة / نبي)'' | |||
''' | ''“...being well advised is, in itself, knowledge of some sort...”'' | ||
<br />- Plato, Republic, 428b<br> | |||
<br />''“...the idea of Imam, Philosopher, Legislator is a single idea.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Fārābī, Taḥṣīl al-Saʿāda (The Attainment of Happiness), §56 | |||
''' | === Prophethood as moral-epistemic authority === | ||
'''Prophethood as moral-epistemic authority''' is the attribution of exceptional moral and cognitive authority to a person understood to convey insight or divine communication. In plain language, a prophet is treated as a guide to truth and right life. A prophet is interpreted functionally as a bearer of disclosed insight whose credibility depends on its truth and transformative ethical effects. This is a Hikmati reinterpretation, not Plato’s definition of a prophet. | |||
== 112 Persuasion and rhetoric ''Peithō / rhētorikē'' == | |||
''Peithō / rhētorikē (πειθώ / ῥητορική) • risāla / rasūl (رسالة / رسول)'' | |||
< | ''“...rhetoric as a whole [is] a skill which leads the soul through words...”'' | ||
<br />- Plato, Phaedrus, 261a<br> | |||
<br />''“Religion sets forth their images by means of similitudes of them taken from corporeal principles.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Fārābī, Taḥṣīl al-Saʿāda (The Attainment of Happiness), §55 | |||
''' | === Messengership as norm entrepreneurship === | ||
'''Messengership as norm entrepreneurship''' is a public role of conveying and organising a normatively consequential message to an audience. In plain language, a messenger seeks to change how people think and act. When genuine insight must change shared life, communication through teaching, symbolic expression and moral example becomes a distinct social function. | |||
''' | == 113 Model and guardian ''Paradeigma / phylax'' == | ||
''imāma / imām (إمامة / إمام) • Paradeigma / phylax (παράδειγμα / φύλαξ)'' | |||
''' | ''“Until, then, kings are philosophers, or philosophers are kings, cities will never cease from ill.”'' | ||
<br />- Plato, Republic, 473d–e<br> | |||
<br />''“...the idea of Imam, Philosopher, Legislator is a single idea.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Fārābī, Taḥṣīl al-Saʿāda (The Attainment of Happiness), §56 | |||
''' | === Imamate as normative exemplarity === | ||
'''Imamate as normative exemplarity''' is a role of exemplary guidance or guardianship through conduct, judgment and institutional care. In plain language, an imam is a model and guide, not merely a title. A recognised exemplar may preserve and embody guidance after its first disclosure; any exclusive succession claim needs additional historical and ethical premises. | |||
== 114 Writing and account ''Gramma / logos'' == | |||
''Gramma / logos (γράμμα / λόγος) • kitāb / qurʾān / tadwīn (كتاب / قرآن / تدوين)'' | |||
< | ''“...words which cannot defend themselves by argument and cannot teach the truth effectually.”'' | ||
<br />- Plato, Phaedrus, 275e<br> | |||
<br />''“...the voluntary intelligibles are embodied in laws.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Fārābī, Taḥṣīl al-Saʿāda (The Attainment of Happiness), §56 | |||
''' | === Scripture as textual crystallisation === | ||
'''Scripture as textual crystallisation''' is the conversion of oral, social or visionary traditions into authoritative written artefacts. In plain language, teachings become texts that people preserve and interpret. Oral teachings and revelatory claims can become texts, which aid preservation but are subject to transmission, variant interpretation, genre and historical context. | |||
''' | == 115 Refutation and inquiry ''Elenchos / historia'' == | ||
''al-naqd al-tārīkhī (النقد التاريخي) • Elenchos / historia (ἔλεγχος / ἱστορία)'' | |||
''' | ''“...the unexamined life is not worth living...”'' | ||
<br />- Plato, Apology, 38a<br> | |||
<br />''“...the one who suspects his faith in them and questions what he gathers from them...”'' | |||
<br />- Ibn al-Haytham, al-Shukūk ʿalā Baṭlamyūs (Doubts Concerning Ptolemy), introduction | |||
=== Historical-critical method === | |||
'''Historical-critical method''' is the historical method of evaluating claims by provenance, dating, context, comparison and criticism of sources. In plain language, investigate what probably happened by testing the evidence. Historical claims should be evaluated using chronology, source provenance, context, independent attestation and alternative hypotheses—not accepted solely because a community venerates them. | |||
== 116 Correctness of names ''Orthotēs onomatōn'' == | |||
''fiqh al-lugha / naqd al-nuṣūṣ (فقه اللغة / نقد النصوص) • Orthotēs onomatōn (ὀρθότης ὀνομάτων)'' | |||
''' | ''“...a lover of these processes of division and bringing together, as aids to speech and thought...”'' | ||
<br />- Plato, Phaedrus, 266b<br> | |||
<br />''“...one and the same word [is used] for a variety of subjects...”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Bīrūnī, Taḥqīq mā li-l-Hind (India), I, introduction | |||
''' | === Philology and textual criticism === | ||
'''Philology and textual criticism''' is the scholarly analysis of language, transmission and variant readings to determine the meaning and history of texts. In plain language, check words, manuscripts and contexts before deciding what a text says. Meaning depends on language, usage, textual variation and genre. The existence of a Platonic philosophy of naming does not amount to the modern discipline of textual criticism. | |||
== 117 Narrative and testimony ''Diēgēsis / martyria'' == | |||
''Diēgēsis / martyria (διήγησις / μαρτυρία) • naqd al-isnād wa-l-matn (نقد الإسناد والمتن)'' | |||
< | ''“Theaetetus is sitting.”'' | ||
<br />- Plato, Sophist, 263a–b<br> | |||
<br />''“Lastly, a man may tell a lie from ignorance, blindly following others who told him.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Bīrūnī, Taḥqīq mā li-l-Hind (India), introduction | |||
''' | === Isnād-cum-matn analysis === | ||
'''Isnād-cum-matn analysis''' is a contemporary historical technique jointly analysing chains of transmission and variation in report wording. In plain language, compare who transmitted a story with how its versions changed. Transmission-chain analysis and comparison of wording allow one to test the history of reports. Plato’s multigenerational Atlantis account is only a loose ancestor of the question of transmission. | |||
== 118 Opinion and custom ''Doxa / nomos'' == | |||
''arkān al-īmān / uṣūl al-dīn (أركان الإيمان / أصول الدين) • Doxa / nomos (δόξα / νόμος)'' | |||
''' | ''“...true opinion along with an account is knowledge...”'' | ||
<br />- Plato, Theaetetus, 201d<br> | |||
<br />''“Religion is opinions and actions, determined and restricted with stipulations and prescribed for a community by their first ruler”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Fārābī, Kitāb al-Milla (Book of Religion), §1 | |||
''' | === Religious beliefs === | ||
'''Religious beliefs''' is a community's descriptive set of accepted doctrinal propositions, distinguished from their independent warrant. In plain language, the beliefs a religious group holds. A community normally articulates some shared claims; which claims are required should remain proportional to what can actually be defended. | |||
== 119 Agreement and obedience ''Homologia / peithesthai'' == | |||
''Homologia / peithesthai (ὁμολογία / πείθεσθαι) • islām / shahāda (إسلام / شهادة)'' | |||
< | ''“...I shall obey the god rather than you...”'' | ||
<br />- Plato, Apology, 29d<br> | |||
<br />''“Religion is opinions and actions, determined and restricted with stipulations and prescribed for a community by their first ruler”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Fārābī, Kitāb al-Milla (Book of Religion), §1 | |||
''' | === Confessional identity and Islamic alignment === | ||
'''Confessional identity and Islamic alignment''' is the alignment of personal religious identification with a public confession or communal commitment. In plain language, stating and living one's religious allegiance. Islam here denotes belonging to, or self-identification with, the Islamic tradition in a revisable Hikmati sense. Its philosophical theme of willing submission to ultimate reality is addressed separately in the personal-practice sequence; neither sense is a Greek etymology. | |||
''' | == 120 Inquiry and dialectic ''Zētēsis / dialektikē'' == | ||
''taʿaddud al-madhāhib al-falsafiyya / ijtihād (تعدد المذاهب الفلسفية / اجتهاد) • Zētēsis / dialektikē (ζήτησις / διαλεκτική)'' | |||
''' | ''“...to enable it to rise to that which requires no assumption and is the starting-point of all...”'' | ||
<br />- Plato, Republic, 511b<br> | |||
<br />''“Finally, philosophy is prior to religion in time.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Fārābī, Taḥṣīl al-Saʿāda (The Attainment of Happiness), §55 | |||
''' | === Hikmati philosophical–mystical pluralism === | ||
'''Hikmati philosophical–mystical pluralism''' is the coexistence of multiple philosophical programmes within a shared tradition of reasoned dispute. In plain language, a wisdom tradition can contain disagreement without becoming incoherent. Adherence to the common rational method, ethical orientation, transformative cultivation and sovereignty of intellect need not imply uniform assent to each contested metaphysical model. Interpretations of the One, divine simplicity, waḥy, graded being and consciousness may compete within the Hikmati family; shared basic commitments and evidence-responsive dialogue, not a frozen creed, define the proposed unity. This is a modern policy of the movement, inspired by Platonic inquiry rather than asserted as Plato’s own pluralist doctrine. | |||
== 121 Name and account ''Onoma / logos'' == | |||
''Onoma / logos (ὄνομα / λόγος) • taʿaddud al-asmāʾ / al-taʿrīf al-siyāqī (تعدد الأسماء / التعريف السياقي)'' | |||
< | ''“...a lover of these processes of division and bringing together, as aids to speech and thought...”'' | ||
<br />- Plato, Phaedrus, 266b<br> | |||
<br />''“Religion is opinions and actions, determined and restricted with stipulations and prescribed for a community by their first ruler”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Fārābī, Kitāb al-Milla (Book of Religion), §1 | |||
''' | === Contextual and plural identity === | ||
'''Contextual and plural identity''' is the use of plural context-sensitive labels while fixing precise intended meanings in each discussion. In plain language, different names can describe overlapping positions without being identical. Different self-descriptions can signal different substantive affinities to different audiences; transparent explanation prevents strategic labels from becoming misleading claims of orthodox membership. | |||
== 122 Law and correct opinion ''Nomos / orthē doxa'' == | |||
''Nomos / orthē doxa (νόμος / ὀρθὴ δόξα) • taqnīn al-ʿaqāʾid / taqlīd (تقنين العقائد / تقليد)'' | |||
''' | ''“...lawmaking belongs to the science of kingship...”'' | ||
<br />- Plato, Statesman, 294a<br> | |||
<br />''“Religion is opinions and actions, determined and restricted with stipulations and prescribed for a community by their first ruler”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Fārābī, Kitāb al-Milla (Book of Religion), §1 | |||
''' | === Doctrinal stabilisation === | ||
'''Doctrinal stabilisation''' is the institutional selection and maintenance of relatively stable doctrinal formulations for teaching and organisation. In plain language, communities codify beliefs, though they may need later correction. Minimal shared formulations can aid teaching and coordination, but the commitment to correction prohibits treating a historically contingent formula as immune from evidence or debate. | |||
== 123 Royal craft ''Basilikē technē'' == | |||
''Basilikē technē (βασιλικὴ τέχνη) • ḥākimiyyat al-ʿaql al-siyāsiyya (حاكمية العقل السياسية)'' | |||
< | ''“...lawmaking belongs to the science of kingship...”'' | ||
<br />- Plato, Statesman, 294a<br> | |||
<br />''“To be a truly perfect philosopher one has to possess both the theoretical sciences and the faculty for exploiting them for the benefit of all others according to their capacity.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Fārābī, Taḥṣīl al-Saʿāda (The Attainment of Happiness), §54 | |||
''' | === Political Sovereignty of Intellect === | ||
'''Political Sovereignty of Intellect''' is the normative claim that political decisions should be constrained by rational understanding of public welfare. In plain language, governing requires knowledge and judgment, not merely strength or popularity. Political decisions affect welfare and need knowledge of causes and consequences; authority should therefore be answerable to the best available reasons and moral aims rather than arbitrary status. | |||
== 124. Philosophoi basileusōsin kai politeia (Philosopher-kings and constitution) == | |||
''ḥākimiyyat al-ʿaql / ḥukm al-ḥukamāʾ (حاكمية العقل / حكم الحكماء) • Philosophoi basileusōsin / politeia (φιλόσοφοι βασιλεύσωσιν / πολιτεία)'' | |||
''' | ''“Until, then, kings are philosophers, or philosophers are kings, cities will never cease from ill.”'' | ||
<br />- Plato, Republic, 473d–e<br> | |||
<br />''“To be a truly perfect philosopher one has to possess both the theoretical sciences and the faculty for exploiting them for the benefit of all others according to their capacity.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Fārābī, Taḥṣīl al-Saʿāda (The Attainment of Happiness), §54 | |||
''' | === Noocracy === | ||
'''Noocracy''' is plato's proposed political arrangement in which philosophical knowledge and public authority are combined. In plain language, those governing should deeply understand justice and the good. Noocracy designates the political institutionalisation of intellectual and ethical governance. The prior ethical and epistemic premises support the norm that authority should answer to wisdom; they do not by themselves establish a monopoly of office by a philosopher or the infallibility of any candidate. | |||
== 125 Intellect and the Good ''Nous / agathon'' == | |||
''ḥākimiyyat al-ʿaql al-ʿālamiyya (حاكمية العقل العالمية) • Nous / agathon (νοῦς / ἀγαθόν)'' | |||
< | ''“He was good, and the good can never have any jealousy of anything.”'' | ||
<br />- Plato, Timaeus, 29e<br> | |||
<br />''“To be a truly perfect philosopher one has to possess both the theoretical sciences and the faculty for exploiting them for the benefit of all others according to their capacity.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Fārābī, Taḥṣīl al-Saʿāda (The Attainment of Happiness), §54 | |||
''' | === Global Sovereignty of Intellect === | ||
'''Global Sovereignty of Intellect''' is the aspiration to apply truth-oriented political judgment across the global scope of collective affairs. In plain language, public reason should serve humanity rather than one nation alone. If intellect ought to guide political institutions, and moral consideration extends beyond state borders, the standard likewise extends to transnational institutions and global consequences. This establishes a worldwide norm, not a single world-state or constitutional design. | |||
''' | == 126 Accountability and refutation ''Euthyna / elenchos'' == | ||
''al-muḥāsaba wa-l-murājaʿa (المحاسبة والمراجعة) • Euthyna / elenchos (εὔθυνα / ἔλεγχος)'' | |||
''' | ''“...the unexamined life is not worth living...”'' | ||
<br />- Plato, Apology, 38a<br> | |||
<br />''“...the voluntary intelligibles are embodied in laws.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Fārābī, Taḥṣīl al-Saʿāda (The Attainment of Happiness), §56 | |||
''' | === Noocratic accountability and epistemic safeguards === | ||
'''Noocratic accountability and epistemic safeguards''' is institutional arrangements making expert or wisdom-claiming authorities contestable, reviewable and accountable. In plain language, even a very wise ruler must be checked and corrected. Because leaders are fallible, wisdom-based authority must remain corrigible through public reasons, independent scrutiny, review and mechanisms for replacing failed officeholders. Otherwise it collapses into self-declared superiority. | |||
== 127 Rule and knowledge ''Archē / epistēmē'' == | |||
''al-wilāya al-ʿaqliyya (الولاية العقلية) • Archē / epistēmē (ἀρχή / ἐπιστήμη)'' | |||
< | ''“Until, then, kings are philosophers, or philosophers are kings, cities will never cease from ill.”'' | ||
<br />- Plato, Republic, 473d–e<br> | |||
<br />''“To be a truly perfect philosopher one has to possess both the theoretical sciences and the faculty for exploiting them for the benefit of all others according to their capacity.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Fārābī, Taḥṣīl al-Saʿāda (The Attainment of Happiness), §54 | |||
''' | === Noocratic authority === | ||
'''Noocratic authority''' is the authority to govern justified by demonstrable competence, integrity and accountable service to the common good. In plain language, being fit to govern must be earned rather than merely proclaimed. Collective action sometimes requires authorised decisions, but legitimate authority must be publicly justified and subject to constraints rather than assumed to be personally infallible. | |||
''' | == 128 Leadership and guardians ''Hēgemonia / phylakes'' == | ||
''al-qiyāda al-ḥakīma (القيادة الحكيمة) • Hēgemonia / phylakes (ἡγεμονία / φύλακες)'' | |||
''' | ''“...lawmaking belongs to the science of kingship...”'' | ||
<br />- Plato, Statesman, 294a<br> | |||
<br />''“To be a truly perfect philosopher one has to possess both the theoretical sciences and the faculty for exploiting them for the benefit of all others according to their capacity.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Fārābī, Taḥṣīl al-Saʿāda (The Attainment of Happiness), §54 | |||
=== Noocratic leadership === | |||
'''Noocratic leadership''' is the practice of organising coordinated action through knowledgeable, ethical and responsive leadership. In plain language, leaders should organise people well and accept correction. Leadership is needed to coordinate inquiry, action and public responsibility; institutions may distribute it across persons and councils. | |||
== 129 Philosopher and ruler ''Philosophos / archōn'' == | |||
''al-ḥakīm al-ḥākim / al-imām (الحكيم الحاكم / الإمام) • Philosophos / archōn (φιλόσοφος / ἄρχων)'' | |||
''“Until, then, kings are philosophers, or philosophers are kings, cities will never cease from ill.”'' | |||
<br />- Plato, Republic, 473d–e<br> | |||
<br />''“To be a truly perfect philosopher one has to possess both the theoretical sciences and the faculty for exploiting them for the benefit of all others according to their capacity.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Fārābī, Taḥṣīl al-Saʿāda (The Attainment of Happiness), §54 | |||
''' | === Noocratic leader / philosopher-guardian === | ||
'''Noocratic leader / philosopher-guardian''' is a proposed leader selected for integrative wisdom, tested moral character and proven practical competence. In plain language, choose a wise and capable public guardian, not a self-declared saviour. A philosopher-guardian represents the aspiration to integrate expertise, virtue and leadership; whether any individual qualifies is an open evidentiary matter and no officeholder is exempt from scrutiny. | |||
''' | == 130 Examination and knowledge ''Dokimasia / gnōsis'' == | ||
''Dokimasia / gnōsis (δοκιμασία / γνῶσις) • maʿrifat al-imām / tamyīz al-ḥakīm (معرفة الإمام / تمييز الحكيم)'' | |||
''“...learn with one part of ourselves, feel anger with another, and with yet a third desire...”'' | |||
<br />- Plato, Republic, 436a–b<br> | |||
<br />''“To be a truly perfect philosopher one has to possess both the theoretical sciences and the faculty for exploiting them for the benefit of all others according to their capacity.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Fārābī, Taḥṣīl al-Saʿāda (The Attainment of Happiness), §54 | |||
=== Noocratic leader-recognition === | |||
=== | '''Noocratic leader-recognition''' is the process of assessing claims to leadership through evidence, character, expertise and institutional scrutiny. In plain language, verify whether someone deserves to lead. Recognition must involve publicly testable judgment, ethical conduct, outcomes and willingness to accept correction, rather than charisma alone. | ||
''' | == 131 Education and likeness to God ''Paideia / homoiōsis theōi'' == | ||
''Paideia / homoiōsis theōi (παιδεία / ὁμοίωσις θεῷ) • taʾalluh / takhalluq bi-akhlāq Allāh (تألّه / تخلّق بأخلاق الله)'' | |||
''' | ''“...the whole soul be turned from the world of becoming into that of being...”'' | ||
<br />- Plato, Republic, 518c<br> | |||
<br />''“To be a truly perfect philosopher one has to possess both the theoretical sciences and the faculty for exploiting them for the benefit of all others according to their capacity.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Fārābī, Taḥṣīl al-Saʿāda (The Attainment of Happiness), §54 | |||
=== Noocratic leader-formation === | |||
'''Noocratic leader-formation''' is the developmental training of prospective leaders in reasoning, virtue, administration and public responsibility. In plain language, educate leaders thoroughly before giving them power. If no suitable leadership exists, educational institutions and aspiring participants can cultivate relevant capacities, though without presuming the right to rule. | |||
== 132 Obedience and concord ''Peithesthai / homonoia'' == | |||
''Peithesthai / homonoia (πείθεσθαι / ὁμόνοια) • ṭāʿa / walāʾ (طاعة / ولاء)'' | |||
''“...I shall obey the god rather than you...”'' | |||
<br />- Plato, Apology, 29d<br> | |||
<br />''“...the voluntary intelligibles are embodied in laws.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Fārābī, Taḥṣīl al-Saʿāda (The Attainment of Happiness), §56 | |||
=== Noocratic allegiance === | |||
'''Noocratic allegiance''' is a conditional relation of political loyalty grounded in legitimate authority, reciprocal obligation and ethical constraints. In plain language, support good leadership without surrendering independent judgment. Allegiance is conditional on competence and moral legitimacy; it cannot override truthful inquiry, human rights or reasonable criticism. | |||
''' | == 133 Friendship ''Philia'' == | ||
''Philia (φιλία) • tawallā (تولّى)'' | |||
''' | ''“...in no case is it just to harm anyone.”'' | ||
<br />- Plato, Republic, 335e<br> | |||
<br />''“...needs to know happiness and to set it before his eyes as his end.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Fārābī, al-Siyāsa al-Madaniyya (The Political Regime), II | |||
=== Tawallā === | |||
'''Tawallā''' is affirmative solidarity with persons, institutions or principles judged conducive to the common good. In plain language, stand with those acting justly and wisely. Love of exemplary persons can reinforce ethical commitment; loyalties remain defeasible when an exemplar violates the principles that justify the attachment. | |||
== 134 Enmity and discernment ''Echthra / diakrisis'' == | |||
== | ''Echthra / diakrisis (ἔχθρα / διάκρισις) • tabarrā (تبرّى)'' | ||
''' | ''“...in no case is it just to harm anyone.”'' | ||
<br />- Plato, Republic, 335e<br> | |||
<br />''“...needs to know happiness and to set it before his eyes as his end.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Fārābī, al-Siyāsa al-Madaniyya (The Political Regime), II | |||
''' | === Tabarrā === | ||
'''Tabarrā''' is principled disassociation from conduct or institutions judged unjust, without abandoning impartial standards. In plain language, reject wrongdoing without making enemies into a hated identity group. Disavowal can target injustice or falsehood, but cannot be used to justify harassment or harm against people merely for disagreement; Socrates rejects harming others as justice. | |||
== 135 Helper ''Epikouros'' == | |||
''Epikouros (ἐπίκουρος) • wazīr / nāṣir (وزير / ناصر)'' | |||
''“...the law is not concerned with making any one class in the state do exceptionally well...”'' | |||
<br />- Plato, Republic, 519e<br> | |||
<br />''“To be a truly perfect philosopher one has to possess both the theoretical sciences and the faculty for exploiting them for the benefit of all others according to their capacity.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Fārābī, Taḥṣīl al-Saʿāda (The Attainment of Happiness), §54 | |||
''' | === Noocratic deputy recruitment === | ||
'''Noocratic deputy recruitment''' is the identification and recruitment of competent assistants entrusted with delegated responsibilities. In plain language, find reliable people who can help lead effectively. Collaborative leadership benefits from reliable deputies; there is no strict requirement that every institution appoint exactly one deputy. | |||
''' | == 136 Helper and community ''Epikouros / koinōnia'' == | ||
''Epikouros / koinōnia (ἐπίκουρος / κοινωνία) • wasīṭ / bāb (وسيط / باب)'' | |||
''“...rhetoric as a whole [is] a skill which leads the soul through words...”'' | |||
<br />- Plato, Phaedrus, 261a<br> | |||
<br />''“...needs to know happiness and to set it before his eyes as his end.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Fārābī, al-Siyāsa al-Madaniyya (The Political Regime), II | |||
=== Trusted intermediation === | |||
=== | '''Trusted intermediation''' is the controlled delegation of information and access through intermediaries who remain accountable. In plain language, use trustworthy go-betweens without concealing misconduct. Trusted intermediaries can connect different groups, provided transparency, checks and safeguarding prevent exclusive control of access to authority. | ||
''' | == 137 Helper and collaborator ''Epikouros / synergos'' == | ||
''Epikouros / synergos (ἐπίκουρος / συνεργός) • wazīr (وزير)'' | |||
'' | ''“...the law is not concerned with making any one class in the state do exceptionally well...”'' | ||
<br />- Plato, Republic, 519e<br> | |||
<br />''“...needs to know happiness and to set it before his eyes as his end.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Fārābī, al-Siyāsa al-Madaniyya (The Political Regime), II | |||
=== Wazīr function === | |||
'''Wazīr function''' is a delegated ministerial function coordinating executive tasks in service of wider aims. In plain language, a capable minister helps turn policy into practice. The functional equivalent of a minister or deputy provides administrative continuity and advice; the specific Qurʾānic-Islamic title is a later development. | |||
''' | == 138 Association and companionship ''Synousia / hetaireia'' == | ||
''ḥawāriyyūn / khawāṣṣ (حواريون / خواص) • Synousia / hetaireia (συνουσία / ἑταιρεία)'' | |||
''' | ''“...the law is not concerned with making any one class in the state do exceptionally well...”'' | ||
<br />- Plato, Republic, 519e<br> | |||
<br />''“To be a truly perfect philosopher one has to possess both the theoretical sciences and the faculty for exploiting them for the benefit of all others according to their capacity.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Fārābī, Taḥṣīl al-Saʿāda (The Attainment of Happiness), §54 | |||
=== Inner-circle formation === | |||
'''Inner-circle formation''' is formation of a trusted study or leadership circle built through shared learning and ethical commitment. In plain language, develop a small group able to work together thoughtfully. Small groups can support close teaching and mutual accountability, but secrecy should not shield wrongdoing or replace publicly defensible reasons. | |||
== 139 Guardians ''Phylakes'' == | |||
=== | ''anṣār / aṣḥāb / awliyāʾ (أنصار / أصحاب / أولياء) • Phylakes (φύλακες)'' | ||
''' | ''“...the power and capacity of learning exists in the soul already...”'' | ||
<br />- Plato, Republic, 518c<br> | |||
<br />''“To be a truly perfect philosopher one has to possess both the theoretical sciences and the faculty for exploiting them for the benefit of all others according to their capacity.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Fārābī, Taḥṣīl al-Saʿāda (The Attainment of Happiness), §54 | |||
''' | === Noocratic cadre recruitment === | ||
'''Noocratic cadre recruitment''' is recruitment and education of an organised core entrusted with responsible movement work. In plain language, train dependable organisers who answer to public standards. As projects grow, training and responsible delegation become useful; support should not be based on personal loyalty at the expense of truth or public welfare. | |||
''' | == 140 Guardians and education ''Phylakes / paideia'' == | ||
''Phylakes / paideia (φύλακες / παιδεία) • ṭalīʿa / nuḵba (طليعة / نخبة)'' | |||
''' | ''“...the power and capacity of learning exists in the soul already...”'' | ||
<br />- Plato, Republic, 518c<br> | |||
<br />''“To be a truly perfect philosopher one has to possess both the theoretical sciences and the faculty for exploiting them for the benefit of all others according to their capacity.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Fārābī, Taḥṣīl al-Saʿāda (The Attainment of Happiness), §54 | |||
=== Vanguardism === | |||
'''Vanguardism''' is a strategically advanced cohort that develops and communicates a programme while remaining accountable to those affected. In plain language, an educational vanguard leads by competence, not unquestioned superiority. An educational vanguard may help cultivate expertise and public engagement; its legitimate role must be educational and accountable rather than claiming immunity from scrutiny. | |||
== 141 Grace and friendship ''Charis / philia'' == | |||
== | ''Charis / philia (χάρις / φιλία) • jamāʿa / daʿwa (جماعة / دعوة)'' | ||
''' | ''“...rhetoric as a whole [is] a skill which leads the soul through words...”'' | ||
<br />- Plato, Phaedrus, 261a<br> | |||
<br />''“Religion is opinions and actions, determined and restricted with stipulations and prescribed for a community by their first ruler”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Fārābī, Kitāb al-Milla (Book of Religion), §1 | |||
''' | === Charismatic community formation === | ||
'''Charismatic community formation''' is the process by which exemplarity, personal trust and common purpose attract a community around a mission. In plain language, build trust around a shared vision rather than personality alone. Public trust and personal example can attract followers, but claims of wisdom still require evidence independent of magnetism or enthusiasm. | |||
''' | == 142 Multitude and community ''Plēthos / koinōnia'' == | ||
''al-qāʿida al-ijtimāʿiyya (القاعدة الاجتماعية) • Plēthos / koinōnia (πλῆθος / κοινωνία)'' | |||
''' | ''“...the law is not concerned with making any one class in the state do exceptionally well...”'' | ||
<br />- Plato, Republic, 519e<br> | |||
<br />''“Religion is opinions and actions, determined and restricted with stipulations and prescribed for a community by their first ruler”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Fārābī, Kitāb al-Milla (Book of Religion), §1 | |||
=== Movement constituency formation === | |||
'''Movement constituency formation''' is the expansion of a movement's support among adherents, allies and participating communities. In plain language, build a broad base of informed supporters. Supportive publics can make sustained collective programmes possible; legitimacy is not measured simply by membership size. | |||
== 143 Courage and justice ''Andreia / dikaiosynē'' == | |||
== | ''Andreia / dikaiosynē (ἀνδρεία / δικαιοσύνη) • jihād / muqāwama (جهاد / مقاومة) • Satyāgraha (सत्याग्रह)'' | ||
''' | ''“...in no case is it just to harm anyone.”'' | ||
<br />- Plato, Republic, 335e<br> | |||
<br />''“To be a truly perfect philosopher one has to possess both the theoretical sciences and the faculty for exploiting them for the benefit of all others according to their capacity.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Fārābī, Taḥṣīl al-Saʿāda (The Attainment of Happiness), §54 | |||
=== Resistance === | |||
'''Resistance''' is ethically justified opposition to oppression or injustice through proportionate, accountable means. In plain language, challenge harmful power without abandoning the value of human life. Resistance to injustice may include intellectual challenge, organising, lawful protest and nonviolent civil resistance; specific action must satisfy proportionality and harm constraints. | |||
''' | == 144 Constitutional change ''Metabolē politeias'' == | ||
''Metabolē politeias (μεταβολὴ πολιτείας) • thawra ʿaqliyya / inqilāb (ثورة عقلية / انقلاب)'' | |||
''' | ''“Until, then, kings are philosophers, or philosophers are kings, cities will never cease from ill.”'' | ||
<br />- Plato, Republic, 473d–e<br> | |||
<br />''“To be a truly perfect philosopher one has to possess both the theoretical sciences and the faculty for exploiting them for the benefit of all others according to their capacity.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Fārābī, Taḥṣīl al-Saʿāda (The Attainment of Happiness), §54 | |||
=== Noocratic revolution === | |||
'''Noocratic revolution''' is fundamental transformation of public institutions toward the proposed rule of informed judgment and the common good. In plain language, deeply reform unjust institutions without treating force as automatically justified. Where institutions systematically obstruct justified reform and the common good, a fundamental transformation may become defensible. Its timing and means depend on evidence, legitimacy, proportionality, rights and alternatives; revolutionary commitment is not a deductive licence for coercion. | |||
== 145 Legislation and constitution ''Nomothesia / politeia'' == | |||
== | ''Nomothesia / politeia (νομοθεσία / πολιτεία) • taṣmīm al-muʾassasāt / siyāsa (تصميم المؤسسات / سياسة)'' | ||
''' | ''“...lawmaking belongs to the science of kingship...”'' | ||
<br />- Plato, Statesman, 294a<br> | |||
<br />''“To be a truly perfect philosopher one has to possess both the theoretical sciences and the faculty for exploiting them for the benefit of all others according to their capacity.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Fārābī, Taḥṣīl al-Saʿāda (The Attainment of Happiness), §54 | |||
''' | === Institutional design === | ||
'''Institutional design''' is the deliberate construction of legal and administrative roles, procedures, safeguards and incentives. In plain language, make institutions that promote good decisions and limit abuse. Durable roles, review procedures, rights and incentives can make reason-responsive governance more reliable than reliance on individuals alone. | |||
''' | == 146 Law ''Nomos'' == | ||
''Nomos (νόμος) • sharīʿa / fiqh / furūʿ al-dīn (شريعة / فقه / فروع الدين)'' | |||
'' | ''“...lawmaking belongs to the science of kingship...”'' | ||
<br />- Plato, Statesman, 294a<br> | |||
<br />''“Religion is opinions and actions, determined and restricted with stipulations and prescribed for a community by their first ruler”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Fārābī, Kitāb al-Milla (Book of Religion), §1 | |||
=== Religious law === | |||
'''Religious law''' is a body of religiously authorised norms governing conduct and communal life within an evolving interpretive tradition. In plain language, religious rules shape practice but require sound interpretation. Law translates ethical guidance into predictable norms, but historical jurisprudence must not be mistaken for an eternally exhaustive account of the good. | |||
== 147 Law and succession ''Nomos / diadochē'' == | |||
== | ''Nomos / diadochē (νόμος / διαδοχή) • taʾsīs al-wilāya / tanẓīm al-khilāfa (تأسيس الولاية / تنظيم الخلافة)'' | ||
''' | ''“...lawmaking belongs to the science of kingship...”'' | ||
<br />- Plato, Statesman, 294a<br> | |||
<br />''“...many things remain that could occur in another time or in another country, each needing a specifically determined action...”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Fārābī, Kitāb al-Milla (Book of Religion), §7 | |||
''' | === Routinisation of charisma === | ||
'''Routinisation of charisma''' is the transition from personal influence to durable offices, procedures and succession arrangements. In plain language, build an organisation that can survive its founder. Sustainable institutions require succession plans and norms beyond the founder’s personality; institutionalisation must preserve opportunities for correction. | |||
''' | == 148 Constitution and royal craft ''Politeia / basilikē technē'' == | ||
''Politeia / basilikē technē (πολιτεία / βασιλικὴ τέχνη) • wilāyat al-faqīh / ijtihād / maṣlaḥa (ولاية الفقيه / اجتهاد / مصلحة)'' | |||
''' | ''“Until, then, kings are philosophers, or philosophers are kings, cities will never cease from ill.”'' | ||
<br />- Plato, Republic, 473d–e<br> | |||
<br />''“...many things remain that could occur in another time or in another country, each needing a specifically determined action...”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Fārābī, Kitāb al-Milla (Book of Religion), §7 | |||
=== Khomeinist revival and revisable political jurisprudence === | |||
'''Khomeinist revival and revisable political jurisprudence''' is a proposed critical reading of Khomeini's combination of Islamic jurisprudence, philosophical spirituality and revolutionary statecraft. In plain language, examine Khomeinism as a historically contingent effort to unite religious wisdom and governance. Hikmah Islam understands Khomeini’s revolutionary synthesis of mysticism, jurisprudence and statecraft as one historically situated development of the Platonic wisdom-and-rule project. This lineage is an interpretive position; it is not deduced from consciousness or logic and must remain evaluable by ethical outcomes and evidence. | |||
== 149 The common good ''Agathon / koinon'' == | |||
''Agathon / koinon (ἀγαθόν / κοινόν) • al-maṣlaḥa al-ʿālamiyya / ʿimārat al-arḍ (المصلحة العالمية / عمارة الأرض)'' | |||
''“...the law is not concerned with making any one class in the state do exceptionally well...”'' | |||
<br />- Plato, Republic, 519e<br> | |||
<br />''“To be a truly perfect philosopher one has to possess both the theoretical sciences and the faculty for exploiting them for the benefit of all others according to their capacity.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Fārābī, Taḥṣīl al-Saʿāda (The Attainment of Happiness), §54 | |||
=== Civilisational and global ethical stewardship === | |||
'''Civilisational and global ethical stewardship''' is long-term collective responsibility for global sentient welfare, ecological conditions and the effects of institutions. In plain language, care for humanity, other sentient life and future generations. The aim of wisdom-governed institutions extends to global sentient wellbeing, ecology, protection from preventable suffering, and responsible management of future technologies. | |||
== 150 Craft and practical wisdom ''Technē / phronēsis'' == | |||
== | ''ḥikmat al-taqniyya / siyāsat al-dhakāʾ al-iṣṭināʿī (حكمة التقنية / سياسة الذكاء الاصطناعي) • Technē / phronēsis (τέχνη / φρόνησις)'' | ||
''' | ''“...words which cannot defend themselves by argument and cannot teach the truth effectually.”'' | ||
<br />- Plato, Phaedrus, 275e<br> | |||
<br />''“...the voluntary intelligibles are embodied in laws.”'' | |||
<br />- Al-Fārābī, Taḥṣīl al-Saʿāda (The Attainment of Happiness), §56 | |||
''' | === Technological and AI stewardship === | ||
'''Technological and AI stewardship''' is the ethical governance of powerful technology through evidence, institutional oversight, safety and human agency. In plain language, assess and control technologies, including AI, by their real effects on flourishing. Given the earlier ethical and noocratic aims, technologies that amplify or displace cognition require critical assessment of their effects on truth, agency, flourishing and institutions. Plato’s discussion of writing supplies an early analogue, not a forecast of artificial intelligence. | |||
''' | == 151 Inquiry and dialectic ''Zētēsis / dialektikē'' == | ||
''ijtihād / tajdīd / naẓar (اجتهاد / تجديد / نظر) • Zētēsis / dialektikē (ζήτησις / διαλεκτική)'' | |||
''' | ''“...to enable it to rise to that which requires no assumption and is the starting-point of all...”'' | ||
<br />- Plato, Republic, 511b<br> | |||
<br />''“...the one who suspects his faith in them and questions what he gathers from them...”'' | |||
<br />- Ibn al-Haytham, al-Shukūk ʿalā Baṭlamyūs (Doubts Concerning Ptolemy), introduction | |||
=== Future inquiry and rational revisability === | |||
'''Future inquiry and rational revisability''' is the standing epistemic obligation to revisit, test and revise claims, practices and institutions as understanding improves. In plain language, the wisdom project remains open to correction and further discovery. Because even highly developed knowledge remains finite, the culminating political and religious forms cannot be closed: the dialectical ladder is a continuing research programme and must publicly register corrections. | |||
=== 31. Noēton / psychē (νοητόν / ψυχή) — al-mithāliyya al-taḥlīliyya (المثالية التحليلية): Analytic idealism === | === 31. Noēton / psychē (νοητόν / ψυχή) — al-mithāliyya al-taḥlīliyya (المثالية التحليلية): Analytic idealism === | ||