|
|
| (28 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) |
| Line 111: |
Line 111: |
| ===1) Metaphysical rationalism=== | | ===1) Metaphysical rationalism=== |
|
| |
|
| ===2) Primacy of existence=== | | ===2) Foundationalism=== |
|
| |
|
| Reason first encounters that something is. Existence is therefore metaphysically prior to the conceptual profiles (essences) by which we sort and compare things. Essences mark the ways existence can be instantiated; they do not outrank existence itself. This primacy blocks nihilism (that nothing ultimately is) and prevents treating essences as free-floating items that would themselves demand an unexplained ontological status.
| | ===3) Epistemic parsimony=== |
|
| |
|
| “Existence” is not a genus with species under it. It is the act of being by which anything is actual rather than merely possible. Because things exist in many ways and to different degrees, the unity of existence is analogical (or graded) rather than univocal. This explains how diverse realities can still be comparable as “more or less actual” without collapsing them into sameness.
| | ===4) Ontological parsimony=== |
| | |
| | ===5) Primacy of [[Consciousness]]=== |
|
| |
|
| ===3) Necessary existence=== | | ===6) Analytic idealism=== |
|
| |
|
| Ahura Mazda • Allāh • Aten • Baha • Brahman • 'Ēl • Father • God • God the Father • Shangdi • The One • Unconditioned Reality • Vishnu • Waheguru • Yahweh
| | ===7) Oneness of consciousness=== |
|
| |
|
| God is affirmed as the Necessary Existent (wājib al-wujūd), absolutely simple, uncomposed, and ontologically prior to all multiplicity. Tawḥīd thus signifies the unity of existence itself (waḥdat al-wujūd), not merely the numerical oneness of a deity among others. Multiplicity belongs only to the realm of contingent manifestation.
| | Monism • Nondualism |
|
| |
|
| For Rationalist Muslims, belief in God corresponds to the recognition of the Necessary Existent (wājib al-wujūd), whose being is simple, non-composite, and devoid of parts, potentiality, or contingency. God is not an entity among entities but the absolute ground of all existence — pure actuality (faʿl maḥḍ). The divine unity is ontological, not merely numerical: multiplicity belongs to the contingent realm of emanations, while God is utterly simple and self-identical. This view parallels the doctrines of divine simplicity in Avicenna, Aquinas, and Mulla Ṣadrā, as well as the monism of analytic idealism. God, therefore, is not a being who causes things to exist but Being Itself — the necessary substrate upon which all possible realities depend.
| | ===8) Ontological priority=== |
|
| |
|
| ===4) Oneness of necessary existence=== | | ===9) Gradation of consciousness=== |
|
| |
|
| Monotheism • Oneness • Oneness of Allah • Oneness of God • Tawhīd
| | Gradation of existence • Gradation of reality • Tashkīk al-wujūd |
|
| |
|
| Given (i) the Principle of Sufficient Reason (no brute facts), (ii) the contingency of many things (they could have failed to be), and (iii) the rejection of vicious circularity and infinite regress in explanation, reason requires at least one reality that exists by itself—not by participation or derivation. This reality’s non-existence is impossible; its existence is necessary. This terminates explanatory dependence without remainder.
| | ===10) Meta consciousness=== |
|
| |
|
| ===5) Necessary simplicity===
| | Ahura Mazda • Allāh • Aten • Baha • Brahman • 'Ēl • Father • God • God the father • Necessary existent • Necessary existentiator • Necessary reality • Pure consciousness • Shangdi • The divine • The One • Unconditioned reality • Vishnu • Waheguru • Wājib al-wujūd • Yahweh |
|
| |
|
| Al-Basāṭah al-ilāhiyyah • Divine simplicity
| | ===11) Necessary simplicity=== |
|
| |
|
| To terminate explanation non-arbitrarily, the Necessary Existent cannot be composed of parts, properties, or principles that would themselves require a further ground. Composition implies dependence. Therefore, the foundation is simple: its essence is not really distinct from its existence; what it is does not stand apart from that it is.
| | Al-Basāṭah al-ilāhiyyah • Divine simplicity • Monotheism • Oneness • Oneness of Allah • Oneness of God • Tawhīd |
|
| |
|
| ===6) Absolute necessary simplicity=== | | ===12) Absolute necessary simplicity=== |
|
| |
|
| Simplicity is comprehensive: no composition of form/matter, essence/existence, act/potency, universal/particular, subject/accident. Any real internal plurality would reinstate explanatory demands and forfeit ultimacy. Absolute simplicity ensures the foundation is explanatorily final.
| | ===13) Conscientiation ex conscientia=== |
|
| |
|
| ===7) Oneness of being===
| | Badā'a • Creatio ex deo • Origination |
|
| |
|
| Monism • Nondualism
| | ===14) Necessitarianism=== |
|
| |
|
| From absolute simplicity follows unqualified unity. There cannot be two necessary beings: any differentiating feature would either be ungrounded (violating PSR) or would introduce composition (violating simplicity). Unity is not an optional attribute; it is entailed by necessary existence under PSR.
| | ʿAdl • Divine justice |
|
| |
|
| The unity at the source does not deny plurality below. There is one existence diversely received in finite modes. Multiplicity reflects limits in receivers, not a plurality in the source. This avoids both monistic collapse (erasing real difference) and dualistic rupture (splitting being).
| | ===15) Eternalism / [[Eternal Creation]]=== |
|
| |
|
| ===8) The rule of one=== | | ===16) Rule of one=== |
|
| |
|
| ===9) Ontologically first dependent existent=== | | ===17) First conscientiate=== |
|
| |
|
| First creation • First intellect • First light • Image of God • Imago dei • Mashīyya • Nūr Muhammadiyya • Pen • Perfect creation • Qalam • Universal intellect | | First creation • First intellect • First light • Image of God • Imago dei • Mashīyya • Nūr Muhammadiyya • Ontologically first dependent existent • Pen • Perfect creation • Qalam • Universal intellect |
|
| |
|
| At the summit, being and oneness are convertible: the more actual a thing, the more internally one it is (less division, less unrealised potency). This rule explains why derived realities exhibit fragmentation and limitation while the foundation does not.
| | ===18) Intermediary conscientiates=== |
|
| |
|
| ===10) [[Eternal Creation]]===
| | Angels • Immaterial existents • Malāʾika |
|
| |
|
| ===11) Gradation of existence=== | | ===19) Observable universe=== |
| | |
| | Cosmos • Dunyā • Material dimension • Material realm • Material world • Multiverse • Natural World • Olam HaZeh • Physical world • Sensible dimension • Sensible realm • Sensible world • Universe |
|
| |
|
| Gradation of reality • Tashkīk al-wujūd
| | ===20) B-theory of time=== |
|
| |
|
| Finite things differ by degree of actuality and perfection. “More being” means more power, intelligibility, and independence; “less being” means more limitation and dependence. A graded ontology reconciles unity at the source with diversity in the effects and provides an objective scale for value and excellence.
| | Tenseless theory of time |
|
| |
|
| Being presents modes and orders: necessary/contingent; possible/actual/necessary; intelligible/mental/physical; formal/energetic/informational. Recognising these dimensions prevents category mistakes (e.g., treating mental time as if it were foundational becoming) and sets the stage for precise accounts of time, mind, and matter.
| | ===21) Compatibilism=== |
|
| |
|
| ===12) Immaterial dimension===
| | Divine Decree • Divine Predestination • Illusion of Libertarian Free Will • Predestination • Qadar • Soft determinism |
|
| |
|
| Intelligible dimension • Intelligible realm • Intelligible world
| | ===22) Perdurantism=== |
|
| |
|
| ===13) Immaterial existents=== | | ===23) Physical empiricism=== |
|
| |
|
| Angels • Malāʾika
| | Empirical method • Scientific method |
|
| |
|
| They are not anthropomorphic entities but intelligible forces or modalities of divine action within the order of necessity. In metaphysical terms, they correspond to immaterial intelligences — forms or causal principles mediating between the Necessary and the contingent realms. Their obedience is the metaphysical inevitability of their nature: to exist as pure forms of divine causation is to act according to divine necessity.
| | ===24) [[Mindfulness]]=== |
|
| |
|
| Their nomenclature — Gabriel (Jibrīl), Michael (Mīkāʾīl), Israfil, and others — denotes culturally contextual personifications of these cosmic functions. “Gabriel,” for instance, signifies the intellective principle through which revelation (noetic illumination) is transmitted to the human mind; “Michael” may represent the principle of sustenance and order in the natural world, and so forth. Hence, angelology is understood symbolically yet ontologically — as the taxonomy of necessary causal intelligences.
| | Dhikr • God consciousness • Meditation • Salāh • Taqwā |
| | |
| ===14) Material dimension===
| |
|
| |
| Cosmos • Dunyā • Material realm • Material world • Multiverse • Natural World • Olam HaZeh • Physical world • Sensible dimension • Sensible realm • Sensible world • Universe
| |
|
| |
|
| The material order is a stable, mathematically tractable layer within graded being. Its regularities are intelligible and publicly checkable; they instantiate the very demand of PSR in the contingent domain. Treating it as illusory in the pejorative sense would make empirical knowledge impossible; treating it as ultimate would contradict the explanatory ascent already established.
| | ===25) Self-cultivation=== |
|
| |
|
| ===15) B-theory of time=== | | ===26) Superiority of intellect=== |
|
| |
|
| The dependence structure described above favours time as an order of states rather than an ontological “flow” in the foundation. On the B-theory, events are tenselessly ordered (earlier-than/later-than). Change is real as difference across the order, not as a metaphysical becoming at the ultimate level. This preserves causality and explanation while avoiding reifying “passage” as a primitive.
| | ===27) Rational self-governance=== |
|
| |
|
| ===16) Compatibilism=== | | ===28) Mysticism=== |
|
| |
|
| Divine Decree • Divine Predestination • Illusion of Libertarian Free Will • Predestination • Qadar • Soft determinism
| | 'Ibādah • Islām • Servitude • Submission • Worship |
| | |
| Libertarian “could-have-done-otherwise” at the moment of action, ungrounded by reasons, is incoherent under PSR. Yet rational agency remains: we act from reasons that express our form, character, and understanding. This reasons-responsive (compatibilist) agency preserves responsibility while avoiding metaphysical indeterminacy that would reintroduce brute facts.
| |
|
| |
|
| Divine predestination (qadar) is understood through the principle of necessitarianism: all events unfold according to the immutable nexus of causation grounded in divine omniscience. God’s knowledge is not temporal foreknowledge but the eternal self-knowledge of Being — every event, possibility, and contingency already contained within the necessary structure of existence. Human freedom, within this view, is not libertarian but compatibilist: freedom is the self-expression of necessity at the human level, as articulated by Spinoza and echoed by Sadra’s doctrine of substantial motion (ḥaraka jawhariyya). To affirm qadar is to recognise that reality could not have been otherwise — its totality is the rational unfolding of divine simplicity through graded manifestation.
| | ===29) Prayer=== |
|
| |
|
| ===17) [[Consciousness]]===
| | Ṣalāh |
|
| |
|
| Consciousness is the indubitable datum: all inquiry is conducted within it. Within a graded ontology, consciousness is not an inert by-product but an intensity of actuality through which being is self-revealing in finite centres. Denying consciousness to make room for a purely extrinsic materialism undermines the very conditions of knowing.
| | ===30) Fasting=== |
|
| |
|
| ===18) Analytic Idealism===
| | Ṣawm |
|
| |
|
| Meta-Consciousness • Dissociation, Reassociation
| | ===31) Charity=== |
|
| |
|
| Unity and gradation motivate a model in which a meta-conscious field grounds many finite streams. Individual minds are dissociations—bounded, rule-governed perspectives within the field. Exceptional states (deep sleep, near-death, mystical union) exemplify reassociation, i.e., loosening or widening of the bounds. This is not a licence for speculation; it is a way to render mind-world relations intelligible under the prior ontology.
| | Almsgiving • Zakāh |
|
| |
|
| ===19) Perdurantism=== | | ===32) Pilgrimage=== |
|
| |
|
| If finite minds are dissociations within a wider field, there is no a priori reason to assert that the onset of one’s conscious stream coincides with biological birth. “Prelife” names the rational openness—consistent with the priors—to pre-embodied conditions of perspective without committing to any particular folklore.
| | Ḥajj |
|
| |
|
| By the same token, the cessation of bodily function need not entail annihilation of perspective. “Afterlife” denotes reassociation of the informational/intentional structure that constituted a person’s perspective with a wider scope. This is a metaphysical possibility that naturally follows from the mind-model; its specific contours require evidential inquiry.
| | ===33) [[Resistance]]=== |
|
| |
|
| Given the B-series, the felt flow of time is a feature of consciousness—our way of accessing successive states—rather than a fundamental becoming. This clarifies memory, anticipation, and temporal phenomenology without elevating them to ontological primitives.
| | Discipline • Exertion • Fighting • Jihād • Striving • Struggle |
|
| |
|
| ===20) Physical empiricism=== | | ===34) Heightened consciousness=== |
|
| |
|
| Empirical method • Scientific method
| | Altered state of consciousness • Anubhava • Enlightenment • Henosis • Ilhām • Nirvana • Noetic mystical experience • Nubuwwah • Perfect knowledge acquisition • Prophethood • Samadhi • Revelation • Wahī |
|
| |
|
| Because contingent facts can only be discriminated by observation, test, and replication, science is reason’s mandated method for the natural world: model, predict, measure, attempt to falsify, update. This is not an optional cultural choice; it is the epistemic application of PSR and contingency to nature. Where controlled experiment is impossible (e.g., cosmology), methodological surrogates (consilience, retrodiction, robustness checks) carry the same rational aim.
| | ===35) Gradation of Intellect=== |
|
| |
|
| ===21) Recognition of potential===
| | Cognitive heterogeneity |
|
| |
|
| ===22) Primacy of intellect=== | | ===36) [[Local cultivation]]=== |
| | |
| ===23) Actualising personal potential===
| |
| | |
| 'Ibādah • Islām • Servitude • Submission • Worship
| |
| | |
| ===24) Actualisation of potential===
| |
| | |
| Anubhava • Enlightenment • Henosis • Ilhām • Nirvana • Nubuwwah • Perfect knowledge acquisition • Prophethood • Samadhi • Revelation • Wahī
| |
| | |
| ===25) Actualising regional potential===
| |
|
| |
|
| Messengership • Risālah | | Messengership • Risālah |
| | | |
| ===26) Actualising global potential / [[Maximisation of Personal & Global Wellbeing (Constrained)]]==== | | ===37) Global cultivation / [[Maximisation of Personal & Global Wellbeing (Constrained)]]=== |
| | |
| If value is not to be brute, it must answer to intelligible reasons. The minimal cross-cultural denominator is sentient wellbeing: gradients of suffering and flourishing, plus the capabilities that realise rational goods (knowledge, friendship, beauty, virtue). Metrics must be public, evidence-based, and revisable.
| |
| | |
| Reason universalises: like cases deserve like consideration. Moral concern extends to all sentient beings, with degrees of obligation modulated by relational ties, reciprocity, and social roles. Species membership alone is not a rationally basic boundary.
| |
| | |
| Given universal concern and PSR, ethics aims at maximising net wellbeing over appropriate horizons, constrained by justice, rights, trust, and long-run stability. Deontic rules function as structural safeguards that, justified by experience and game-theoretic insight, protect aggregate flourishing from short-sighted optimising.
| |
| | |
| ===26) Gradation of Intellect===
| |
| | |
| Pedagogy, Society, and Rule
| |
| | |
| As being is graded, intellectual capacities vary across attention, abstraction, integration, and moral prudence. This variance is descriptive, not pejorative, and it predicts differential receptivity to demonstration, dialectic, and rhetoric.
| |
| | |
| Inevitability of Intellectual Hierarchy
| |
| | |
| Because capacities and responsibilities differ, functions stratify in any complex society: research, judgment, instruction, execution. Properly construed, hierarchy is ordered service to the common good, not domination.
| |
| | |
| Divine Scriptures
| |
| | |
| The “Books of God” (kutub Allāh) are interpreted as moments of revelation — epistemic apprehensions of divine truth by human consciousness. Revelation, in this view, is not linguistic dictation but intellectual illumination: the human mind’s reception of eternal truths refracted through its historical, linguistic, and psychological contingencies. Each scripture — Torah, Psalms, Gospel, and Qur’an — represents a theophany (tajallī) of the same divine logos expressed in the idiom of a particular community and epoch. Universal revelations express perennial metaphysical truths; particular ones address contextual, socio-moral arrangements. Thus, the diversity of scriptures is the necessary pluralisation of the One Truth within time and language.
| |
|
| |
|
| ===27) Noocracy=== | | ===38) Noocracy=== |
|
| |
|
| Imāmah • Perfect manhood • Philosopher kingship • Technocracy | | Imāmah • Perfect manhood • Philosopher kingship • Technocracy |
|
| |
|
| The ideal governor unites wisdom (ends) and techne (means), is accountable to demonstrable truth, and orders institutions to the common good. Historical forms vary (council, imamate, constitutional technocracy), but the rational principle is stable: competence guided by virtue under intelligible law.
| | ===39) [[Philosopher King]]=== |
| | |
| Imamate signifies the perpetuation of divine guidance through intellectual continuity rather than genealogical descent. The imām is the bearer of ʿaql mustafād—the fully actualised intellect that mediates between transcendent truth and communal life. In rationalist terms, the Imamate represents the principle of intellectual succession: the necessity that wisdom, once disclosed, be continuously embodied in minds capable of sustaining and interpreting it.
| |
| | |
| ===28) [[Philosopher King]]=== | |
|
| |
|
| Demigod • High-Conscious Individual • High-Integration Individual • Hujjah • Imām • Infallible • Insān al-Kāmil • Insān ‘alā Khuluqin ‘Adhīm • Integrate • Ma'sūm • Messenger • Meta-Conscious Agent • Nabī • New Man • Perfect human • Perfect rational animal • Philosopher king • Prophet • Rasūl • Transhuman • Übermensch | | Demigod • High-Conscious Individual • High-Integration Individual • Hujjah • Imām • Infallible • Insān al-Kāmil • Insān ‘alā Khuluqin ‘Adhīm • Integrate • Ma'sūm • Messenger • Meta-Conscious Agent • Nabī • New Man • Perfect human • Perfect rational animal • Philosopher king • Prophet • Rasūl • Transhuman • Übermensch |
|
| |
|
| | ===40) Intellectual Accommodation=== |
|
| |
|
| Prophethood (nubuwwa) denotes the emergence of consciousnesses capable of receiving and articulating revelatory truths. Prophets are loci of intensified noetic awareness through whom divine wisdom becomes existentially and socially operative.
| | Tawriyyah |
|
| |
|
| Muhammad is affirmed as the Seal of Prophethood (khātam al-nabiyyīn) with respect to the specific historical-cultural dispensation of late antiquity — i.e., the terminal synthesis of the Abrahamic prophetic cycle within the Arabian milieu. However, the rationalist view recognises the logical possibility of analogous prophetic functions in other spatio-temporal contexts; Mani, the Buddha, or Socrates, for instance, may be regarded as prior or parallel manifestations of the same revelatory continuum. Prophethood thus designates not an exclusive office but a metaphysical function within the evolution of consciousness — each prophet serving as a node through which universal wisdom (ḥikma) becomes historically embodied.
| | ===41) Intellectual Dissimulation=== |
|
| |
|
| ====Nubuwwa (Prophethood)====
| | Taqīyyah |
| Prophets are higher modes of consciousness through which divine intellect becomes articulated in human history. Their distinction lies not in supernatural interruption but in perfected receptivity to truth. Prophetic communication is the linguistic and cultural crystallisation of universal wisdom within a particular civilisational horizon.
| |
|
| |
|
| | ===42) Cognitive reframing=== |
|
| |
|
| | ===43) Motifs and Imagery=== |
|
| |
|
| | Motifs—light, ascent, circle, garden, path—translate abstract truths into memorable forms that shape imagination and action. Repetition builds identity; symbol stabilises norms. |
|
| |
|
| ====19) Intellectual Accommodation==== | | ===44) Mythos for Most=== |
| | |
| Teaching must fit the receiver’s form. The same truth can (and should) be delivered as proof for the few, argument for the many, and symbol for beginners. This is responsible communication, not dilution.
| |
| | |
| ====20) Intellectual Dissimulation (Strict Sense)====
| |
| | |
| Taqīyya - thawriyya
| |
| | |
| “Dissimulation” here means strategic reserve: withholding advanced material where foreseeable misinterpretation would harm. It is stewardship of truth under PSR (avoid predictable epistemic damage), not licence for deceit.
| |
| | |
| ====Cognitive reframing====
| |
| | |
| ====21) Need to Encourage and Control Behaviour====
| |
| | |
| Where demonstration alone will not move median behaviour, law, institutions, incentives, and norms are rational instruments to align action with the good. This is an application of PSR to collective life: effects follow causes; therefore, design the causes.
| |
| | |
| ====22) Need for Dogma====
| |
| | |
| “Dogma” means publicly fixed minima of right belief and practice that coordinate a civilisation. It protects the many from costly error while leaving upper tiers open to demonstration and qualified debate. Dogma is not a substitute for truth; it is a civic guardrail toward it.
| |
| | |
| ====23) Metanarratives====
| |
| | |
| Human agents reason within stories. A metanarrative integrates metaphysics, ethics, and destiny into an intelligible arc that motivates virtue and sacrifice. Without a shared narrative, social coordination and long-range projects degrade.
| |
| | |
| ====24) Mythos for Most====
| |
|
| |
|
| Symbol and story teach where proof cannot yet reach. Properly used, mythos is not falsehood but imaginal pedagogy—true content rendered in forms accessible to typical abstraction bandwidths. It is accommodation at scale. | | Symbol and story teach where proof cannot yet reach. Properly used, mythos is not falsehood but imaginal pedagogy—true content rendered in forms accessible to typical abstraction bandwidths. It is accommodation at scale. |
|
| |
|
| ====25) Motifs and Imagery==== | | ===45) Repurposing Myths and Legends=== |
| | |
| Motifs—light, ascent, circle, garden, path—translate abstract truths into memorable forms that shape imagination and action. Repetition builds identity; symbol stabilises norms.
| |
| | |
| ====26) Repurposing Myths and Legends====
| |
|
| |
|
| Existing cultural materials can be redeemed: stripped of false metaphysics, rekeyed to the Necessary Existent and rational ethics, and redeployed for formation. Continuity with correction preserves social capital while elevating understanding. | | Existing cultural materials can be redeemed: stripped of false metaphysics, rekeyed to the Necessary Existent and rational ethics, and redeployed for formation. Continuity with correction preserves social capital while elevating understanding. |
|
| |
|
| Rationalist Muslims argue the sequence above is not a miscellany. It is a chain: from the Five Priors to necessary existence; from necessity to simplicity and unity; from unity to graded multiplicity; from there to time, mind, world, method; then to value, pedagogy, and governance. Each conclusion answers a demand issued by the commitments at the start, leaving no step as a brute assertion. In this sense, Rationalist Islam is not a set of optional beliefs but a worked-out map of what reason itself necessitates about being, knowing, living, and ordering a common life.
| | ===46) Metanarratives=== |
|
| |
|
| | Human agents reason within stories. A metanarrative integrates metaphysics, ethics, and destiny into an intelligible arc that motivates virtue and sacrifice. Without a shared narrative, social coordination and long-range projects degrade. |
|
| |
|
| ====Shahāda (Testimony of Faith)==== | | ===47) Religion=== |
| The declaration lā ilāha illā Allāh, Muḥammad rasūl Allāh signifies not mere confessional identity but ontological recognition: “No reality exists but the Real, and the human intellect (exemplified in Muḥammad) is its messenger.” The Shahāda thus encapsulates the metaphysical and epistemic unity of existence and intellect.
| |
|
| |
|
| Pillars of Faith (Arkān al-Īmān)
| | ===48) Religious beliefs=== |
| Uṣūl al-Dīn
| |
|
| |
|
| | Arkān al-īmān • Pillars of faith • 'Uṣūl al-dīn |
|
| |
|
| Furūʿ al-Dīn (Branches of Religion)
| | ===49) Religious laws=== |
| Sunni Arkān al-Islām (Pillars of Practice)
| |
|
| |
|
| | Branches of religion • Furūʿ al-dīn • Pillars of practice |
|
| |
|
| The furūʿ are ethical-ritual expressions of metaphysical truths. Each act symbolises and cultivates an inner disposition aligned with the ontological order.
| | ===50) Need for Dogma=== |
|
| |
|
| ====Ṣalāt (Prayer)====
| | “Dogma” means publicly fixed minima of right belief and practice that coordinate a civilisation. It protects the many from costly error while leaving upper tiers open to demonstration and qualified debate. Dogma is not a substitute for truth; it is a civic guardrail toward it. |
| The rhythmic realignment of the self with the Ground of Being; a phenomenological exercise in returning to presence (ḥuḍūr).
| |
|
| |
|
| ====Ṣawm (Fasting)==== | | ===51) Confessional identity=== |
| The voluntary suspension of lower appetites to reassert primacy of the intellective over the corporeal.
| |
|
| |
|
| ====Zakāt (Almsgiving)====
| | Shahāda • Testimony of Faith |
| The recognition that material differentiation is accidental; redistribution manifests the unity of the collective soul.
| |
|
| |
|
| ====Ḥajj (Pilgrimage)==== | | ===51) Need to Encourage and Control Behaviour=== |
| An enacted cosmology: the circumambulation of the One by the many, signifying the soul’s return to its origin.
| |
| | |
| ====Jihād (Striving)====
| |
| Primarily the inner struggle against ignorance and delusion; outward struggle is justifiable only as the defence of conditions for intellectual and moral flourishing.
| |
| | |
| ====Khums (One-Fifth Levy)====
| |
| The rational expression of distributive justice: a mechanism for the cyclical purification of surplus wealth, preventing the concentration of material power that distorts moral and intellectual equilibrium. In its essence, khums signifies the return of excess to the collective whole from which all sustenance arises.
| |
| | |
| ====Amr bi’l-Maʿrūf & Nahy ʿan al-Munkar====
| |
| The rational imperative to promote virtue and restrain vice; not coercion, but moral pedagogy rooted in intellectual hierarchy.
| |
| | |
| ====Tawallā & Tabarrā====
| |
| Symbolic of epistemic allegiance and disassociation: attachment to truth and detachment from falsehood, understood ontologically rather than tribally.
| |
| | |
| Thus, the furūʿ become modes of ethical cultivation, each a symbolic pedagogy for the soul’s ascent through the gradations of being.
| |
|
| |
|
| | Where demonstration alone will not move median behaviour, law, institutions, incentives, and norms are rational instruments to align action with the good. This is an application of PSR to collective life: effects follow causes; therefore, design the causes. |
|
| |
|
| | ===Hagiography=== |
|
| |
|
| | Apotheosis • Deification • Divinisation • [[Ghulāt]] / Ghuluw • Heroisation • Legendary accretion • Mythicisation • Myth-making • Mythologisation • Mythopoeia • Sacralisation • Tawallā |
|
| |
|
| ====Ṣalāt (Prayer)==== | | ===Heresiography=== |
| Interpreted as the rhythmic unification of consciousness with the Real; its temporal structure symbolises the cyclical return of multiplicity to unity.
| |
|
| |
|
| ====Zakāt (Almsgiving)====
| | Tabarrā |
| Represents the ontological interdependence of all beings; to give is to acknowledge that possession is a contingent differentiation within a unified field of existence.
| |
|
| |
|
| ====Ṣawm (Fasting during Ramaḍān)==== | | ==Timeline== |
| An exercise in epistemic purification: by abstaining from sensory indulgence, the intellect re-centres itself on the essential.
| |
|
| |
|
| ====Ḥajj (Pilgrimage to Mecca)==== | | ===Classical antiquity=== |
| The paradigmatic enactment of the soul’s journey from dispersion to unity: Mecca as the ontological axis (quṭb), the Kaʿba as symbol of divine simplicity, and circumambulation as the orbit of contingent being around the Necessary Existent.
| |
|
| |
|
| | Socrates holds dialogues |
|
| |
|
| classical logical norms: non-contradiction, identity, and valid inference.
| | '''399 BCE, Athens''' |
| | <br /> |
| | Socrates is executed by poison |
|
| |
|
| Explanatory adequacy: principle of sufficient reason, parsimony, coherence with well-established findings.
| | '''c. 387 BCE, Athens''' |
| | <br /> |
| | Plato founds the Academy |
|
| |
|
| Public reason: justifications accessible to any competent inquirer; aversion to special pleading.
| | '''c. 387 - ? BCE, Athens''' |
| | <br /> |
| | Plato conceives Theory of Ideas |
| | <br /> |
| | Plato conceives Theory of Soul |
| | <br /> |
| | Plato conceives Form of the Good |
| | <br /> |
| | Plato conceives Allegory of the Cave |
| | <br /> |
| | Plato conceives The Philosopher King |
| | <br /> |
| | Plato conceives The Noble Lie |
|
| |
|
| Domain-specific empiricism
| | '''335 BCE, Athens''' |
| | <br /> |
| | Aristotle founds the Lyceum |
|
| |
|
| Nature and technology: experimental method, peer critique, replication.
| | '''335 BCE - ?, Athens''' |
| | <br /> |
| | Aristotle conceives formal logic |
|
| |
|
| History: source criticism, chronology, philology, intertextuality, external controls (epigraphy, archaeology), and context.
| | '''c. 27 CE, Jerusalem''' |
| | <br /> |
| | [[Jesus]] begins noocratic revolution |
|
| |
|
| | '''c. 30 CE, Jerusalem''' |
| | <br /> |
| | Jesus is demonised by Jewish ethnocratic propaganda |
| | <br /> |
| | Jesus is executed by Roman timocratic crucifixion |
|
| |
|
| ====13.1 Hagiography==== | | ===Late antiquity=== |
|
| |
|
| Apotheosis • Deification • Divinisation • Ghuluw • Heroisation • Legendary accretion • Mythicisation • Myth-making • Mythologisation • Mythopoeia • Sacralisation
| | '''c. 245–270 CE, Rome''' |
| | <br /> |
| | Plotinus conceives The One |
| | <br /> |
| | Plotinus conceives Emanation by the One |
| | <br /> |
| | Plotinus establishes Neoplatonism |
| | <br /> |
| | Proclus popularises Platonism |
|
| |
|
| =====13.1.2 [[Ghulāt]]=====
| | Pseudo-Dionysius symbolises Neoplatonism |
|
| |
|
| | '''610 CE, Mecca''' |
| | <br /> |
| | [[Muḥammad]] begins noocratic revolution |
|
| |
|
| ====ʿAdl (Divine Justice)====
| | '''622 CE, Medina''' |
| Justice, in rationalist metaphysics, is the invariance of the divine order—every existent occupies precisely its necessary degree within the ontological hierarchy. Apparent injustice arises only from partial perspectives. Theodicy is therefore resolved through the principle of necessitarian harmony: all that exists unfolds necessarily from the divine simplicity in the best and only possible way.
| | <br /> |
| | Muḥammad establishes noocratic revolution |
|
| |
|
| | '''632 CE, Medina''' |
| | <br /> |
| | Muḥammad dies in suspicious circumstances |
| | <br /> |
| | Abu Bakr restores clanocracy |
| | <br /> |
| | [[Ali]] begins noocratic revolution |
|
| |
|
| ====Maʿād (Return / Eschaton)====
| | '''656 CE, Medina''' |
| Eschatology is interpreted ontologically: the Return is the re-integration of individuated consciousness into higher degrees of unity. The “resurrection” is the unveiling of one’s existential reality; paradise and hell denote modes of consciousness corresponding to nearness or alienation from the Source.
| | <br /> |
| | 'Uthmān ibn 'Affān is assassinated by sword |
|
| |
|
| ====5. Belief in the Day of Judgment====
| | '''656 CE, Medina''' |
| | <br /> |
| | ʿAlī establishes noocratic revolution |
|
| |
|
| The Day of Judgment (yawm al-qiyāmah) is interpreted phenomenologically as the moment of ontological reassociation: when individuated consciousnesses, having undergone temporal disassociation from their source, re-integrate into higher, more unified levels of awareness. This eschatological event is continuous and gradational rather than merely episodic or spatial. The traditional dichotomy of paradise and hell symbolises the polar extremes of conscious experience — beatific proximity to the Source versus alienated distance from it. Between these poles lies a continuum of existential states proportional to one’s degree of ontological realisation. Thus, “resurrection” (baʿth) signifies the re-awakening of consciousness to its prior unity, and “judgment” the unveiling (kashf) of the ontological truth already inscribed within each being’s nature.
| | '''661 CE, Kufa''' |
| | <br /> |
| | ʿAlī is assassinated by kratocratic sword |
| | <br /> |
| | Hasan ibn ʿAlī protects noocratic revolution |
| | <br /> |
| | Hasan ibn ʿAlī is assassinated by poison |
| | <br /> |
| | Ḥusayn ibn ʿAlī begins noocratic revolution |
|
| |
|
| [[Hadīths]]
| | '''680 CE, Karbala''' |
| | <br /> |
| | Husayn ibn ʿAlī is assassinated by clanocratic sword |
|
| |
|
| | '''732 CE, Medina''' |
| | <br /> |
| | Jaʿfar al-Ṣādiq begins noocratic revolution |
|
| |
|
| | '''765 CE, Medina''' |
| | <br /> |
| | Jaʿfar al-Ṣādiq is assassinated by clanocratic poison |
|
| |
|
| ==Essentialist Affirmation of Doctrinal Schemas== | | ===Islamic Golden Age=== |
|
| |
|
| While Rationalist Islam constructs its metaphysical and ethical framework independently on rational and evidentiary grounds, it recognises within the major Islamic doctrinal formulations—Sunni arkān al-īmān and arkān al-islām, Shi‘i uṣūl al-dīn and furūʿ al-dīn—essential correspondences to its own rationally derived principles.
| | '''c. 820 - 870 CE, Baghdad''' |
| | <br /> |
| | al-Kindī |
|
| |
|
| Owing to its doctrines of intellectual accommodation, semantic polyvalence, and essentialist hermeneutics, Rationalist Islam affirms these traditional formulations analogically: not by uncritical adoption of their forms, but by recognising within them the same underlying truths apprehended in different linguistic, cultural, and historical idioms.
| | '''c. 950 CE, Damascus''' |
| | <br /> |
| | al-Fārābī islamicises Neoplatonism |
|
| |
|
| Rationalist Islam constructs its metaphysical and ethical system independently through reason, ontology, and empirical coherence, yet it acknowledges deep structural resonances with the traditional doctrinal frameworks of Islam.
| | '''c. 940 – 1060 CE, Basra''' |
| These correspondences are not nominal but analogical—arising from the recognition that truths apprehended through revelation and those derived by reason share a common referent in reality (al-ḥaqīqah al-wāḥidah).
| | <br /> |
| | Brethren of Purity hold secret meetings |
|
| |
|
| Accordingly, Rationalist Islam affirms the uṣūl al-dīn (principles of religion) and furūʿ al-dīn (branches of religion) articulated within Twelver Shi‘ism, and the arkān al-islām (pillars of practice) formulated within Sunnism, interpreting each in light of its own rational metaphysics, ethics, and epistemology.
| | '''980 – 1037 CE, from Bukhara to Hamadan''' |
| | <br /> |
| | Ibn Sīnā conceives Proof of the Truthful |
|
| |
|
| | '''c. 1186 CE, Aleppo''' |
| | <br /> |
| | Shihab al-Din Yahya ibn Habash Suhrawardi conceives Illuminationism |
|
| |
|
| | '''c. 1191 CE, Aleppo''' |
| | <br /> |
| | Shihab al-Din Yahya ibn Habash Suhrawardi is executed by familiocratic violence |
|
| |
|
| | '''c. 1200–1240 CE, Mecca and Damascus''' |
| | <br /> |
| | Ibn ʿArabī conceives Unity of Existence |
|
| |
|
| Through essentialist hermeneutics and analogical affirmation, Rationalist Islam re-grounds these frameworks as expressions of universal metaphysical and ethical principles.
| | '''c. 1220 - 1270 CE, Maragha''' |
| Each doctrine and practice, when read beyond its literal form, articulates a facet of the same reality: the necessity, unity, and gradation of existence and the ascent of consciousness toward its source.
| | <br /> |
| | Naṣīr al-Dīn al-Ṭūsī synthesises mysticism and science |
|
| |
|
| Doctrinal Correspondence and Analogical Affirmation
| | ===Gunpowder Age=== |
|
| |
|
| system corresponds conceptually to others while affirming them analogically (i.e., at the level of essence, not literal formulation).
| | Mīr Dāmād conceives atemporal origination |
|
| |
|
| Hermeneutic Concordance • Doctrinal Integration through Essential Concordance • Analogical Affirmation of Classical Frameworks • Philosophical Re-grounding of Classical Doctrines • Essentialist Affirmation of Doctrinal Schemas
| | Mulla Sadrā conceives Transcendent Theosophy |
|
| |
|
| [[Hawzah al-Hikmah]]
| | ===Oil Age=== |
|
| |
|
| ===Candidates===
| | Muhammad Husayn Ṭabāṭabāʾī establishes intra-Qur’ānic exegesis |
|
| |
|
| [[Jesus]] (c. 4 BCE–30 CE, Judea) — Preacher, reformer.
| | Morteza Motahhari co-founds the Combatant Clergy Association |
| Preached radical inversion of social norms (“the last shall be first”), extending consciousness into unconditional love and inner purity, even at cost of crucifixion.
| |
|
| |
|
| [[Muḥammad]] (570–632 CE, Arabia) — Philosopher, mystic, merchant, orator, poet, revolutionary, statesman, military commander.
| | Morteza Motahhari is assassinated by Iranian seculocratic gunfire |
| Combined contemplative withdrawal (Ḥirā) with revolutionary vision: transformed fragments of oral, poetic, and legal consciousness into a unifying moral-legal system.
| |
| | |
| [[Ali]] (601–661 CE, Arabia) — Caliph, jurist, philosopher-poet.
| |
| Renowned for sermons that combined courage, self-awareness, and metaphysical reflection; model of integrating ethical action and contemplative thought.
| |
| | |
| Hasan ibn Ali (624–670 CE, Arabia) — 2nd Imam, grandson of Muhammad.
| |
| Praised for conciliatory leadership; relinquished political authority to avoid bloodshed, embodying consciousness of peace and ethical restraint in volatile times.
| |
| | |
| [[Ruhollah Khomeini]] (1902–1989, Iran) — Cleric, revolutionary leader.
| |
| Unified metaphysics, mysticism, and political revolution, embodying sacrificial exile before seizing transformative power.
| |
| | |
| [[Ali Khamenei]] (1939–present, Iran) — Cleric, revolutionary, head of state.
| |
| Blends political leadership with a philosophical-mystical lineage, navigating survival under immense constraint.
| |
| | |
| [[Hassan Nasrallah]] (1960–2024, Lebanon) — Cleric, political-military leader.
| |
| Charismatic orator, blends political struggle with sacrificial posture under constant threat.
| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| ===Legends===
| |
| | |
| ʾĀdām (Ādam, Adam)
| |
| | |
| Idrīs (Enoch or Hermes Trismegistus)
| |
| | |
| Nūḥ (Noah)
| |
| | |
| [[Hūd]]
| |
|
| |
| Ṣāliḥ
| |
|
| |
| Ibrāhīm (Abraham)
| |
| | |
| Lūṭ (Lot)
| |
| | |
| Ismā'īl (Ishmael)
| |
| | |
| Isḥāq (Isaac)
| |
| | |
| Ya'qūb (Jacob)
| |
| | |
| Yūsuf (Joseph)
| |
| | |
| Ayyūb (Job)
| |
| | |
| Shu'ayb
| |
|
| |
| Mūsā (Moses)
| |
| | |
| Hārūn (Aaron)
| |
| | |
| Dāūd (David)
| |
| | |
| Sulaymān (Solomon)
| |
| | |
| Ilyās (Elijah)
| |
| | |
| Alyasa' (Elisha)
| |
| | |
| Yūnus (Jonah)
| |
| | |
| Ḏū l-Kifli (Ezekiel, Isaiah, Obadiah or Buddha)
| |
| | |
| Zakariyyā (Zechariah)
| |
| | |
| Yaḥyā (John the Baptist)
| |
| | |
| Muhammad al-Mahdī
| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| [[Mindfulness]]
| |
| | |
| Dhikr • God consciousness • Meditation • Salāh • Taqwā
| |
|
| |
|
| | Ali Shariati writes Red Shi'sm vs. Black Shi'ism |
|
| |
|
| | Ali Shariati dies in suspicious circumstances |
|
| |
|
| [[Denialism]]
| | ===Information Age=== |
|
| |
|
| [[Cognitive dissonance]] | | '''c. 1940, Qom''' |
| | <br /> |
| | [[Ruhollah Khomeini]] begins noocratic revolution |
|
| |
|
| [[Defence mechanism]]
| | '''1979, Tehran''' |
| | <br /> |
| | Ruhollah Khomeini establishes noocratic revolution |
|
| |
|
| | '''c. 1979, Beqaa, Lebanon''' |
| | <br /> |
| | [[Hassan Nasrallah]] begins noocratic revolution |
|
| |
|
| | '''1989, Tehran''' |
| | <br /> |
| | Ruhollah Khomeini dies |
| | <br /> |
| | [[Ali Khamenei]] protects noocratic revolution |
|
| |
|
| [[Homo sapiens reproduction|Reproduction]]
| | '''2024, Dahieh, Lebanon''' |
| | <br /> |
| | Hassan Nasrallah is assassinated by Jewish ethnocratic airstrike |
|
| |
|
| [[Advocacy]]
| | '''2026, Tehran''' |
| | <br /> |
| | Ali Khamenei is assassinated by American plutocratic & Jewish ethnocratic airstrikes |
Rationalist Islam is an epistemic-led, principle-first, and rational-empirical branch of Islam that grounds views, practices, and identity in a set of independently justified and domain-specific rational principles.
Adherents adopt “Islam” and "Muslim" as identities only after critical assessment of historical evidence suggests that Muḥammad substantially aligned with these principles. Rationalist Islam is, therefore, a continuation of the historical Muhammadan movement with the aim of maximising the wellbeing of all sentient inhabitants of the world.
The guiding maxim often associated with Rationalist Islam is “Religion as movement — not monument,” emphasising an ongoing, adaptive, principle-led, evidence-based, ethically purposive project rather than static veneration and dogma.
Proponents describe Rationalist Islam as a continuation — and internal reformulation — of the broader Near Eastern and Mediterranean “wisdom tradition,” drawing a conceptual lineage from classical philosophy (Plato, Aristotle, Plotinus), biblical and late antique sapiential currents (including the Jesus movement’s emphasis on justice and inner transformation), through Muḥammad’s proclamations, early and medieval Islamic philosophy (falsafa) and mysticism (taṣawwuf/ʿirfān), and extending into modern historical-critical and scientific methods.
Terminology
As an entailment of their commitment to intellectual accommodation and rationalist epistemology, adherents identify and describe themselves contextually — modulating terminology and self-designation according to the audience, subject matter, and communicative purpose.
This adaptive self-representation arises from their understanding that linguistic forms are vehicles of understanding rather than static markers of identity. Within this framework, the use of diverse religious labels functions pedagogically: to convey the essence of truth in whichever language resonates most coherently with a given community.
As a result, Rationalist Muslims assume a wide variety of seemingly conflicting names and employ them contextually, including:
Muslim
Inner Circle Muslim
Shi'i
Inner Circle Shi'i
Red Shi'i
Mystic
Rationalist Mystic
Neoplatonist
Gnostic
Esotericist
Essentialist
Akbarian
Twelver Shi'i
Imami
Ja'fari
Khomeinist
Sunni
Salafi
Theist
Monotheist
Divine Simplicist
Christian
Cognitive dispositions
“whatever is, is; whatever is not, is not.”
Every entity or proposition is self-identical and distinct from its negation.
“nothing can both be and not be in the same respect.”
Nothing can both be and not be in the same respect.
“every real state of affairs has some reason or ground.”
Every real state of affairs is intelligible; it has some reason, ground, or explanation for why it is rather than not, even if that reason is intrinsic.
“some things exist but could, in principle, not have existed.”
There exist beings whose non-existence involves no contradiction.
Explanation cannot be self-grounding or infinitely deferred; every chain of dependence must terminate in something self-sufficient.
Conative dispositions
1. Preference for truth over comfort
2. Desire for personal development
3. Desire for the maximisation of global wellbeing
4. Desire to actively participate in the maximisation of global wellbeing
5. Tendency for self-sacrifice
The Rational Entailments
From the cognitive and conative dispositions follows a series of entailments that together constitute the framework of Rationalist Islam. They are not adopted as beliefs, asserted as doctrines, or accepted by tradition, but are said to follow by necessity from the structure of reason itself.
Each entailment represents what any rational intellect must affirm once it accepts the laws of thought and the intelligibility of being: that contingent existence requires grounding, that explanation must terminate in the self-sufficient, and that the pursuit of knowledge within each domain must proceed according to the logic appropriate to that domain. What follows, therefore, are not articles of faith but the logical unfoldings of reason — the positions that reason itself necessitates concerning existence, knowledge, and ethics.
Rationalist Islam proceeds on the principle that no claim is exempt from reason’s jurisdiction. Every position is derived — not asserted — by applying the Five Prior Rational Commitments. What follows is a continuous sequence of conclusions that any rational agent should grant once those priors are accepted.
2) Foundationalism
3) Epistemic parsimony
4) Ontological parsimony
6) Analytic idealism
7) Oneness of consciousness
Monism • Nondualism
8) Ontological priority
9) Gradation of consciousness
Gradation of existence • Gradation of reality • Tashkīk al-wujūd
Ahura Mazda • Allāh • Aten • Baha • Brahman • 'Ēl • Father • God • God the father • Necessary existent • Necessary existentiator • Necessary reality • Pure consciousness • Shangdi • The divine • The One • Unconditioned reality • Vishnu • Waheguru • Wājib al-wujūd • Yahweh
11) Necessary simplicity
Al-Basāṭah al-ilāhiyyah • Divine simplicity • Monotheism • Oneness • Oneness of Allah • Oneness of God • Tawhīd
12) Absolute necessary simplicity
13) Conscientiation ex conscientia
Badā'a • Creatio ex deo • Origination
14) Necessitarianism
ʿAdl • Divine justice
16) Rule of one
17) First conscientiate
First creation • First intellect • First light • Image of God • Imago dei • Mashīyya • Nūr Muhammadiyya • Ontologically first dependent existent • Pen • Perfect creation • Qalam • Universal intellect
Angels • Immaterial existents • Malāʾika
19) Observable universe
Cosmos • Dunyā • Material dimension • Material realm • Material world • Multiverse • Natural World • Olam HaZeh • Physical world • Sensible dimension • Sensible realm • Sensible world • Universe
20) B-theory of time
Tenseless theory of time
21) Compatibilism
Divine Decree • Divine Predestination • Illusion of Libertarian Free Will • Predestination • Qadar • Soft determinism
22) Perdurantism
23) Physical empiricism
Empirical method • Scientific method
Dhikr • God consciousness • Meditation • Salāh • Taqwā
25) Self-cultivation
26) Superiority of intellect
27) Rational self-governance
28) Mysticism
'Ibādah • Islām • Servitude • Submission • Worship
29) Prayer
Ṣalāh
30) Fasting
Ṣawm
31) Charity
Almsgiving • Zakāh
32) Pilgrimage
Ḥajj
Discipline • Exertion • Fighting • Jihād • Striving • Struggle
34) Heightened consciousness
Altered state of consciousness • Anubhava • Enlightenment • Henosis • Ilhām • Nirvana • Noetic mystical experience • Nubuwwah • Perfect knowledge acquisition • Prophethood • Samadhi • Revelation • Wahī
35) Gradation of Intellect
Cognitive heterogeneity
Messengership • Risālah
38) Noocracy
Imāmah • Perfect manhood • Philosopher kingship • Technocracy
Demigod • High-Conscious Individual • High-Integration Individual • Hujjah • Imām • Infallible • Insān al-Kāmil • Insān ‘alā Khuluqin ‘Adhīm • Integrate • Ma'sūm • Messenger • Meta-Conscious Agent • Nabī • New Man • Perfect human • Perfect rational animal • Philosopher king • Prophet • Rasūl • Transhuman • Übermensch
40) Intellectual Accommodation
Tawriyyah
41) Intellectual Dissimulation
Taqīyyah
42) Cognitive reframing
43) Motifs and Imagery
Motifs—light, ascent, circle, garden, path—translate abstract truths into memorable forms that shape imagination and action. Repetition builds identity; symbol stabilises norms.
44) Mythos for Most
Symbol and story teach where proof cannot yet reach. Properly used, mythos is not falsehood but imaginal pedagogy—true content rendered in forms accessible to typical abstraction bandwidths. It is accommodation at scale.
45) Repurposing Myths and Legends
Existing cultural materials can be redeemed: stripped of false metaphysics, rekeyed to the Necessary Existent and rational ethics, and redeployed for formation. Continuity with correction preserves social capital while elevating understanding.
Human agents reason within stories. A metanarrative integrates metaphysics, ethics, and destiny into an intelligible arc that motivates virtue and sacrifice. Without a shared narrative, social coordination and long-range projects degrade.
47) Religion
48) Religious beliefs
Arkān al-īmān • Pillars of faith • 'Uṣūl al-dīn
49) Religious laws
Branches of religion • Furūʿ al-dīn • Pillars of practice
50) Need for Dogma
“Dogma” means publicly fixed minima of right belief and practice that coordinate a civilisation. It protects the many from costly error while leaving upper tiers open to demonstration and qualified debate. Dogma is not a substitute for truth; it is a civic guardrail toward it.
51) Confessional identity
Shahāda • Testimony of Faith
51) Need to Encourage and Control Behaviour
Where demonstration alone will not move median behaviour, law, institutions, incentives, and norms are rational instruments to align action with the good. This is an application of PSR to collective life: effects follow causes; therefore, design the causes.
Hagiography
Apotheosis • Deification • Divinisation • Ghulāt / Ghuluw • Heroisation • Legendary accretion • Mythicisation • Myth-making • Mythologisation • Mythopoeia • Sacralisation • Tawallā
Heresiography
Tabarrā
Timeline
Classical antiquity
Socrates holds dialogues
399 BCE, Athens
Socrates is executed by poison
c. 387 BCE, Athens
Plato founds the Academy
c. 387 - ? BCE, Athens
Plato conceives Theory of Ideas
Plato conceives Theory of Soul
Plato conceives Form of the Good
Plato conceives Allegory of the Cave
Plato conceives The Philosopher King
Plato conceives The Noble Lie
335 BCE, Athens
Aristotle founds the Lyceum
335 BCE - ?, Athens
Aristotle conceives formal logic
c. 27 CE, Jerusalem
Jesus begins noocratic revolution
c. 30 CE, Jerusalem
Jesus is demonised by Jewish ethnocratic propaganda
Jesus is executed by Roman timocratic crucifixion
Late antiquity
c. 245–270 CE, Rome
Plotinus conceives The One
Plotinus conceives Emanation by the One
Plotinus establishes Neoplatonism
Proclus popularises Platonism
Pseudo-Dionysius symbolises Neoplatonism
610 CE, Mecca
Muḥammad begins noocratic revolution
622 CE, Medina
Muḥammad establishes noocratic revolution
632 CE, Medina
Muḥammad dies in suspicious circumstances
Abu Bakr restores clanocracy
Ali begins noocratic revolution
656 CE, Medina
'Uthmān ibn 'Affān is assassinated by sword
656 CE, Medina
ʿAlī establishes noocratic revolution
661 CE, Kufa
ʿAlī is assassinated by kratocratic sword
Hasan ibn ʿAlī protects noocratic revolution
Hasan ibn ʿAlī is assassinated by poison
Ḥusayn ibn ʿAlī begins noocratic revolution
680 CE, Karbala
Husayn ibn ʿAlī is assassinated by clanocratic sword
732 CE, Medina
Jaʿfar al-Ṣādiq begins noocratic revolution
765 CE, Medina
Jaʿfar al-Ṣādiq is assassinated by clanocratic poison
Islamic Golden Age
c. 820 - 870 CE, Baghdad
al-Kindī
c. 950 CE, Damascus
al-Fārābī islamicises Neoplatonism
c. 940 – 1060 CE, Basra
Brethren of Purity hold secret meetings
980 – 1037 CE, from Bukhara to Hamadan
Ibn Sīnā conceives Proof of the Truthful
c. 1186 CE, Aleppo
Shihab al-Din Yahya ibn Habash Suhrawardi conceives Illuminationism
c. 1191 CE, Aleppo
Shihab al-Din Yahya ibn Habash Suhrawardi is executed by familiocratic violence
c. 1200–1240 CE, Mecca and Damascus
Ibn ʿArabī conceives Unity of Existence
c. 1220 - 1270 CE, Maragha
Naṣīr al-Dīn al-Ṭūsī synthesises mysticism and science
Gunpowder Age
Mīr Dāmād conceives atemporal origination
Mulla Sadrā conceives Transcendent Theosophy
Oil Age
Muhammad Husayn Ṭabāṭabāʾī establishes intra-Qur’ānic exegesis
Morteza Motahhari co-founds the Combatant Clergy Association
Morteza Motahhari is assassinated by Iranian seculocratic gunfire
Ali Shariati writes Red Shi'sm vs. Black Shi'ism
Ali Shariati dies in suspicious circumstances
c. 1940, Qom
Ruhollah Khomeini begins noocratic revolution
1979, Tehran
Ruhollah Khomeini establishes noocratic revolution
c. 1979, Beqaa, Lebanon
Hassan Nasrallah begins noocratic revolution
1989, Tehran
Ruhollah Khomeini dies
Ali Khamenei protects noocratic revolution
2024, Dahieh, Lebanon
Hassan Nasrallah is assassinated by Jewish ethnocratic airstrike
2026, Tehran
Ali Khamenei is assassinated by American plutocratic & Jewish ethnocratic airstrikes