Main Page - Revision history

Admin at 20:48, 5 August 2026

2026-08-05T20:48:10Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:48, 5 August 2026
Line 1,256:		Line 1,256:

	Its relationship to other traditions is therefore both comparative and critical. It does not treat all religions and philosophies as identical, but neither does it treat historically inherited forms as ultimate in themselves. Instead, it seeks to identify the rational entailments that may be expressed beneath different names, symbols, myths, titles, metaphors, and institutions.		Its relationship to other traditions is therefore both comparative and critical. It does not treat all religions and philosophies as identical, but neither does it treat historically inherited forms as ultimate in themselves. Instead, it seeks to identify the rational entailments that may be expressed beneath different names, symbols, myths, titles, metaphors, and institutions.

			[[Twelverism]]

	== Criticism and contested issues ==		== Criticism and contested issues ==

Admin: /* Rational Entailments */

2026-08-03T18:01:39Z

Rational Entailments

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:01, 3 August 2026
Line 270:		Line 270:

	Since reality is intelligible (Metaphysical rationalism), every being, event, claim, and distinction must be answerable to explanation rather than accepted as brute assertion, hence the Principle of sufficient reason.		Since reality is intelligible (Metaphysical rationalism), every being, event, claim, and distinction must be answerable to explanation rather than accepted as brute assertion, hence the Principle of sufficient reason.

			=== 10) Principle of difference ===

			Since every real fact requires a sufficient reason ([[#9) Principle of sufficient reason\|Principle of sufficient reason]]), any real distinction must be grounded in something that makes the distinguished realities different. Two realities cannot be numerically distinct while possessing no differentiating feature, relation, limit, origin, structure, position, state, or mode of existence whatsoever.

			The '''Principle of difference''' therefore states:

			<blockquote>Every real difference requires a real difference-maker. For any realities ''x'' and ''y'', if ''x'' is really distinct from ''y'', there must be some real respect in which ''x'' differs from ''y'' and which grounds their non-identity. If no such differentiating ground exists, ''x'' and ''y'' are not really distinct.</blockquote>

			The principle distinguishes a '''real distinction''' from a merely '''conceptual distinction'''. The intellect may understand or describe one reality through several concepts without thereby multiplying that reality. For example, referring to something as both a cause and an existent does not by itself establish the existence of two separate things. Genuine plurality requires a real basis of individuation.

			The Principle of difference therefore excludes brute or groundless plurality. It also supports [[#12) Ontological parsimony\|Ontological parsimony]] and later entails that an absolutely necessary reality cannot contain genuinely distinct components, properties, states, or internal divisions unless there is some ground differentiating them. Any such differentiating ground would introduce limitation, composition, or dependence and would therefore be incompatible with [[#20) Necessary simplicity\|Necessary simplicity]] and [[#21) Absolute necessary simplicity\|Absolute necessary simplicity]].

	=== 10) Foundationalism ===		=== 10) Foundationalism ===

Admin: /* Rational Entailments */

2026-07-03T22:49:31Z

Rational Entailments

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:49, 3 July 2026
Line 286:		Line 286:

	Since some realities explain others more basically than they are explained by them (Epistemic parsimony and Ontological parsimony), reality is ordered according to what is fundamental and what is derivative, hence Ontological priority.		Since some realities explain others more basically than they are explained by them (Epistemic parsimony and Ontological parsimony), reality is ordered according to what is fundamental and what is derivative, hence Ontological priority.

			=== 14) Qualified ontological monism

			'''Advaita Vedānta • Monism • Non-dualism • Oneness of being • Ontological monism • Priority monism • Unity of being • Waḥdat al-wujūd'''

			Reality is ultimately one, but differentiated into real derivative modes, grades, manifestations, or articulations.

	=== 14) Non-reductive consciousness ===		=== 14) Non-reductive consciousness ===

Admin: /* 48) Veridical cognition */

2026-06-25T07:59:56Z

48) Veridical cognition

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:59, 25 June 2026
Line 516:		Line 516:
	=== 48) Veridical cognition ===		=== 48) Veridical cognition ===

	''Altered state of consciousness • Anubhava • Disclosure • Divine speech • Enlightenment • Heightened consciousness • Henosis • Ilhām • Inspiration • Nirvana • Noetic mystical experience • Nubuwwah • Perfect knowledge acquisition • Prophethood • Revelation • Samadhi • Revelation • Unveiling • Veridical insight • Veridical perception • Waḥī''		''Altered state of consciousness • Anubhava • Disclosure • Divine speech • Enlightenment • Heightened consciousness • Henosis • Ilhām • Inspiration • Nirvana • Noetic mystical experience • Nubuwwah • Perfect knowledge acquisition • [[Prophethood]] • Revelation • Samadhi • Revelation • Unveiling • Veridical insight • Veridical perception • Waḥī''

	The acquisition, realisation, or grasp of what is actually the case. It includes accurate perception, valid inference, scientific discovery, moral realisation, strategic understanding, and revelatory or mystical unveiling insofar as the content disclosed genuinely corresponds to reality.		The acquisition, realisation, or grasp of what is actually the case. It includes accurate perception, valid inference, scientific discovery, moral realisation, strategic understanding, and revelatory or mystical unveiling insofar as the content disclosed genuinely corresponds to reality.

Admin at 02:14, 24 June 2026

2026-06-24T02:14:33Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:14, 23 June 2026
Line 23:		Line 23:
	Hikmah Islam is characterised by an epistemic-led method. Rather than treating doctrine as a closed collection of inherited propositions, it arranges its positions as rational entailments: claims that are intended to follow from prior commitments concerning consciousness, intelligibility, truth, intellect, value, revelation, authority, and human development.		Hikmah Islam is characterised by an epistemic-led method. Rather than treating doctrine as a closed collection of inherited propositions, it arranges its positions as rational entailments: claims that are intended to follow from prior commitments concerning consciousness, intelligibility, truth, intellect, value, revelation, authority, and human development.
	Contemporary developments in philosophy, science, psychology, artificial intelligence, cosmology, and historical criticism are treated as continuing sites of refinement rather than threats to the tradition.		Contemporary developments in philosophy, science, psychology, artificial intelligence, cosmology, and historical criticism are treated as continuing sites of refinement rather than threats to the tradition.

			The movement's current metaphysical framework is developed under [[Hikmati Metaphysics]], an evolving and rationally revisable account of existence, consciousness, intellect, time, causation, mathematical objects, value, and the structure of reality. Hikmati Metaphysics is not treated as a closed creed, but as the present best formulation of Hikmah Islam's metaphysical commitments, subject to refinement or replacement by stronger arguments, clearer models, and deeper correspondence with reality.

	A distinctive feature of Hikmah Islam is its use of rational entailments and comparative clusters. It attempts to organise religious, philosophical, ethical, political, and civilisational claims as a connected sequence from first principles of consciousness, intelligibility, and truth to the final aims of wisdom, noocracy, divine-likeness, and future sentient flourishing. It also interprets many religious, philosophical, mythic, and cultural terms as symbolic or historically clothed expressions of deeper rational forms. In this sense, Hikmah Islam is Islamic in root, mystical and philosophical in method, civilisational in scope, and oriented toward the future protection and perfection of humanity and sentient life, especially in the face of technological and artificial-intelligence-related risks.		A distinctive feature of Hikmah Islam is its use of rational entailments and comparative clusters. It attempts to organise religious, philosophical, ethical, political, and civilisational claims as a connected sequence from first principles of consciousness, intelligibility, and truth to the final aims of wisdom, noocracy, divine-likeness, and future sentient flourishing. It also interprets many religious, philosophical, mythic, and cultural terms as symbolic or historically clothed expressions of deeper rational forms. In this sense, Hikmah Islam is Islamic in root, mystical and philosophical in method, civilisational in scope, and oriented toward the future protection and perfection of humanity and sentient life, especially in the face of technological and artificial-intelligence-related risks.
Line 1,099:		Line 1,101:

	Tanya Goudsouzian & Ibrahim Al-Marashi ''Iran regime: A Plato's Republic thought experiment gone too far?''		Tanya Goudsouzian & Ibrahim Al-Marashi ''Iran regime: A Plato's Republic thought experiment gone too far?''



	~~[[MobileChevronTest]]~~






	{\| class="infobox" style="width:26em; font-size:90%;"		{\| class="infobox" style="width:26em; font-size:90%;"
Line 1,212:		Line 1,205:
	=== Metaphysics and Meta-Consciousness ===		=== Metaphysics and Meta-Consciousness ===

	In Hikmah Islam, metaphysics concerns the necessary ground of existence, intelligibility, consciousness, and value. Meta-Consciousness is used as a stripped-down term for ultimate reality when abstracted from specific religious names and symbolic forms. It corresponds within the framework to the idea of necessary reality, the unconditioned ground, or that which makes consciousness, being, order, and value possible.		Main article: [[Hikmati Metaphysics]]

			Hikmah Islam's metaphysical positions are currently developed under [[Hikmati Metaphysics]], the movement's evolving framework for questions of existence, consciousness, intellect, time, causation, mathematical objects, truth, privation, and the structure of reality. In Hikmah Islam, metaphysics concerns the necessary ground of existence, intelligibility, consciousness, and value. Meta-Consciousness is used as a stripped-down term for ultimate reality when abstracted from specific religious names and symbolic forms. It corresponds within the framework to the idea of necessary reality, the unconditioned ground, or that which makes consciousness, being, order, and value possible.

	=== Human nature and consciousness ===		=== Human nature and consciousness ===

Admin at 18:54, 22 June 2026

2026-06-22T18:54:09Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:54, 22 June 2026
Line 922:		Line 922:
	<br />		<br />
	al-Kindī		al-Kindī

			'''934 – 971 CE (c.), Sijistan / Khurasan / Rayy, Iranian lands (modern eastern Islamic Republic of Iran / Afghanistan region)
			<br />
			Abū Yaʿqūb al-Sijistānī conceives Intellect as the spine of revealed religion.
			* Ismāʿīlī Neoplatonist develops a theology of God beyond categories, universal Intellect, Soul, prophecy, and return.

	'''940 – 1060 CE (c.), Basra, Iraq'''		'''940 – 1060 CE (c.), Basra, Iraq'''
Line 934:		Line 939:
	<br />		<br />
	Ibn Sīnā conceives Proof of the Truthful		Ibn Sīnā conceives Proof of the Truthful

			'''996 – 1021 CE (c.), Kerman / Baghdad / Basra / Cairo, Fatimid-Ismāʿīlī world (modern Islamic Republic of Iran / Iraq / Egypt)
			<br />
			Ḥamīd al-Dīn al-Kirmānī turns metaphysics into imamate, daʿwa, and rational authority
			* Fatimid-Ismāʿīlī theologian-philosopher systematises imamate doctrine and synthesises Ismāʿīlī theology with Aristotelian and Neoplatonic philosophy.

	'''1186 CE (c.), Aleppo, Ayyubid Syria (modern Syria)'''		'''1186 CE (c.), Aleppo, Ayyubid Syria (modern Syria)'''
Line 950:		Line 960:
	<br />		<br />
	Naṣīr al-Dīn al-Ṭūsī synthesises mysticism and science		Naṣīr al-Dīn al-Ṭūsī synthesises mysticism and science

			'''1260 – 1351 CE (c.), Kayseri / Tabriz / İznik, Anatolia and Ilkhanid-Ottoman world (Turkey / modern Islamic Republic of Iran)
			<br />
			Dāwūd al-Qayṣarī institutionalises the metaphysics of manifestation
			* Akbarian philosopher and commentator transmits Ibn ʿArabī’s school into early Ottoman madrasa culture and develops important reflections on time as a measure of being.

	===Gunpowder Age===		===Gunpowder Age===

Admin: /* Historical development and revision */

2026-06-22T18:08:40Z

Historical development and revision

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:08, 22 June 2026
Line 1,169:		Line 1,169:

	Because the framework treats knowledge as developmental, its claims can be clarified or revised when stronger evidence, better reasoning, or deeper understanding becomes available. Hikmah Islam therefore distinguishes between the underlying rational form of a claim and the historically conditioned vocabulary through which it may have been expressed.		Because the framework treats knowledge as developmental, its claims can be clarified or revised when stronger evidence, better reasoning, or deeper understanding becomes available. Hikmah Islam therefore distinguishes between the underlying rational form of a claim and the historically conditioned vocabulary through which it may have been expressed.

			[[Historical-critical method]]

	=== Abstraction from symbolic forms ===		=== Abstraction from symbolic forms ===

Admin at 17:06, 22 June 2026

2026-06-22T17:06:11Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:06, 22 June 2026
Line 1,111:		Line 1,111:
	! style="text-align:center;" \| Methods		! style="text-align:center;" \| Methods
	\|-		\|-
	\| ~~Research library ·~~ Rational entailment · Comparative abstraction · Historical-critical analysis · Textual analysis · Epistemic revision		\| Rational entailment · Comparative abstraction · Historical-critical analysis · Textual analysis · Epistemic revision
	\|-		\|-
	! style="text-align:center;" \| Political expression		! style="text-align:center;" \| Political expression

Admin at 17:01, 22 June 2026

2026-06-22T17:01:22Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:01, 22 June 2026
Line 1,111:		Line 1,111:
	! style="text-align:center;" \| Methods		! style="text-align:center;" \| Methods
	\|-		\|-
	\| [[Research library]] · Rational entailment · Comparative abstraction · Historical-critical analysis · Textual analysis · Epistemic revision		\| Research library · Rational entailment · Comparative abstraction · Historical-critical analysis · Textual analysis · Epistemic revision
	\|-		\|-
	! style="text-align:center;" \| Political expression		! style="text-align:center;" \| Political expression

Admin at 17:00, 22 June 2026

2026-06-22T17:00:42Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:00, 22 June 2026
Line 1,111:		Line 1,111:
	! style="text-align:center;" \| Methods		! style="text-align:center;" \| Methods
	\|-		\|-
	\| Rational entailment · Comparative abstraction · Historical-critical analysis · Textual analysis · Epistemic revision		\| [[Research library]] · Rational entailment · Comparative abstraction · Historical-critical analysis · Textual analysis · Epistemic revision
	\|-		\|-
	! style="text-align:center;" \| Political expression		! style="text-align:center;" \| Political expression